Report Summary

  • 29

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    49% of other websites

  • 82

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 52% of websites

  • 75

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    35% of websites

  • 82

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    44% of websites

nooteboom.nl

Trailers van de hoogste kwaliteit | Nooteboom Trailers

Page Load Speed

4.6 sec in total

First Response

275 ms

Resources Loaded

3.6 sec

Page Rendered

726 ms

nooteboom.nl screenshot

About Website

Visit nooteboom.nl now to see the best up-to-date Nooteboom content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about nooteboom.nl

Nooteboom Trailers is een internationale onderneming die haar klanten oplossingen biedt op het gebied van uitzonderlijk wegvervoer. Nooteboom ontwerpt en bouwt de hoogste kwaliteit trailers met een dr...

Visit nooteboom.nl

Key Findings

We analyzed Nooteboom.nl page load time and found that the first response time was 275 ms and then it took 4.3 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 70% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

nooteboom.nl performance score

29

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value4.4 s

16/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value51.6 s

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value30.7 s

0/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value730 ms

40/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.035

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value52.4 s

0/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

nooteboom.nl

275 ms

638 ms

gravity-forms-theme-reset.min.css

167 ms

gravity-forms-theme-foundation.min.css

240 ms

gravity-forms-theme-framework.min.css

256 ms

Our browser made a total of 137 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 1% of them (1 request) were addressed to the original Nooteboom.nl, 85% (116 requests) were made to Nooteboom.com and 4% (6 requests) were made to Use.typekit.net. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.1 sec) relates to the external source Nooteboom.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 570.0 kB (9%)

Content Size

6.7 MB

After Optimization

6.1 MB

In fact, the total size of Nooteboom.nl main page is 6.7 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 65% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 6.4 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-88%

Potential reduce by 194.0 kB

  • Original 220.7 kB
  • After minification 157.3 kB
  • After compression 26.7 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 63.4 kB, which is 29% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 194.0 kB or 88% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-5%

Potential reduce by 344.0 kB

  • Original 6.4 MB
  • After minification 6.0 MB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Nooteboom images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-26%

Potential reduce by 32.0 kB

  • Original 122.0 kB
  • After minification 122.0 kB
  • After compression 90.0 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 32.0 kB or 26% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 68 (54%)

Requests Now

126

After Optimization

58

The browser has sent 126 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Nooteboom. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 38 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 17 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Accessibility Review

nooteboom.nl accessibility score

82

Accessibility Issues

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Tables and lists

These are opportunities to improve the experience of reading tabular or list data using assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

List items (<li>) are not contained within <ul> or <ol> parent elements.

Best practices

These items highlight common accessibility best practices.

Impact

Issue

High

[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.

Best Practices

nooteboom.nl best practices score

75

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Serves images with low resolution

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

High

Page has valid source maps

SEO Factors

nooteboom.nl SEO score

82

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Links are not crawlable

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document doesn't use legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    NL

  • Language Claimed

    NL

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Nooteboom.nl can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that Dutch is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Nooteboom.nl main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Nooteboom. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: