Report Summary

  • 61

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    76% of other websites

  • 46

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 19% of websites

  • 67

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    24% of websites

  • 62

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    22% of websites

norphil.co.uk

Postage stamp collecting. New Great Britain stamps and first day covers

Page Load Speed

2 sec in total

First Response

368 ms

Resources Loaded

1.1 sec

Page Rendered

501 ms

norphil.co.uk screenshot

About Website

Visit norphil.co.uk now to see the best up-to-date Norphil content for Russia and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about norphil.co.uk

Postage stamp collecting information. New issues of Great Britain postage stamps. Pictures of new British stamps and postmarks with particular emphasis on thematic stamp collecting or topical stamp co...

Visit norphil.co.uk

Key Findings

We analyzed Norphil.co.uk page load time and found that the first response time was 368 ms and then it took 1.6 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 30% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

norphil.co.uk performance score

61

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value1.4 s

97/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value1.4 s

100/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value3.4 s

89/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value2,400 ms

5/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.193

64/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value5.8 s

67/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

norphil.co.uk

368 ms

hsv0

41 ms

adc22a90-4e91-4faa-83d3-95d09c9b554c.png

197 ms

norvic.jpg

146 ms

small-hello.jpg

258 ms

Our browser made a total of 29 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 55% of them (16 requests) were addressed to the original Norphil.co.uk, 10% (3 requests) were made to Free.timeanddate.com and 7% (2 requests) were made to Feed.mikle.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (544 ms) relates to the external source Feed.mikle.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 104.4 kB (19%)

Content Size

563.1 kB

After Optimization

458.7 kB

In fact, the total size of Norphil.co.uk main page is 563.1 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 25% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 460.1 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-80%

Potential reduce by 38.5 kB

  • Original 48.3 kB
  • After minification 31.9 kB
  • After compression 9.9 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 16.4 kB, which is 34% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 38.5 kB or 80% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-7%

Potential reduce by 33.7 kB

  • Original 460.1 kB
  • After minification 426.4 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Norphil images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-59%

Potential reduce by 32.3 kB

  • Original 54.6 kB
  • After minification 54.6 kB
  • After compression 22.4 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 32.3 kB or 59% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

We found no issues to fix!

Requests Now

27

After Optimization

27

The browser has sent 27 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Norphil. According to our analytics all requests are already optimized.

Accessibility Review

norphil.co.uk accessibility score

46

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

<frame> or <iframe> elements do not have a title

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

High

Form elements do not have associated labels

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Internationalization and localization

These are opportunities to improve the interpretation of your content by users in different locales.

Impact

Issue

High

<html> element does not have a [lang] attribute

Best Practices

norphil.co.uk best practices score

67

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Displays images with incorrect aspect ratio

High

Serves images with low resolution

SEO Factors

norphil.co.uk SEO score

62

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have descriptive text

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    N/A

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Norphil.co.uk can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and neither this language nor any other was claimed in <html> or <meta> tags. Our system also found out that Norphil.co.uk main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Norphil. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: