4.1 sec in total
469 ms
3.2 sec
382 ms
Click here to check amazing Oemand content. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about oemand.dk
Vi er specialister i at lave online løsninger. Vi tilbyder blandt andet hjemmesider, udvikling, markedsføring og søgemaskineoptimering.
Visit oemand.dkWe analyzed Oemand.dk page load time and found that the first response time was 469 ms and then it took 3.6 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 60% of websites can load faster.
oemand.dk performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value3.9 s
25/100
10%
Value6.8 s
7/100
25%
Value7.3 s
29/100
10%
Value2,020 ms
7/100
30%
Value0.973
2/100
15%
Value14.2 s
9/100
10%
469 ms
524 ms
130 ms
233 ms
284 ms
Our browser made a total of 86 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 85% of them (73 requests) were addressed to the original Oemand.dk, 8% (7 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 2% (2 requests) were made to Fonts.googleapis.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (890 ms) belongs to the original domain Oemand.dk.
Page size can be reduced by 140.2 kB (18%)
799.8 kB
659.5 kB
In fact, the total size of Oemand.dk main page is 799.8 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 65% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 309.3 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 60.5 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 60.5 kB or 80% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 5.2 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Oemand images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 51.4 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 51.4 kB or 17% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 23.2 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Oemand.dk needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 23.2 kB or 12% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 54 (72%)
75
21
The browser has sent 75 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Oemand. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 37 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 19 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
oemand.dk
469 ms
oemand.dk
524 ms
style.min.css
130 ms
styles.css
233 ms
nectar-slider.css
284 ms
portfolio.css
391 ms
style.css
305 ms
font-awesome.min.css
310 ms
grid-system.css
315 ms
style.css
519 ms
magnific.css
382 ms
css
37 ms
responsive.css
422 ms
style.css
414 ms
ascend.css
428 ms
style.css
478 ms
js_composer.min.css
511 ms
salient-dynamic-styles.css
553 ms
css
53 ms
jquery.min.js
582 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
551 ms
core.min.js
583 ms
menu.min.js
608 ms
wp-polyfill-inert.min.js
619 ms
regenerator-runtime.min.js
636 ms
wp-polyfill.min.js
663 ms
dom-ready.min.js
677 ms
hooks.min.js
683 ms
i18n.min.js
708 ms
a11y.min.js
720 ms
autocomplete.min.js
742 ms
wpss-search-suggest.js
764 ms
index.js
775 ms
index.js
781 ms
anime.js
813 ms
nectar-slider.js
854 ms
imagesLoaded.min.js
845 ms
isotope.min.js
890 ms
salient-portfolio.js
885 ms
api.js
41 ms
salient-social.js
876 ms
jquery.easing.js
787 ms
jquery.mousewheel.js
724 ms
priority.js
681 ms
transit.js
682 ms
waypoints.js
681 ms
modernizr.js
696 ms
hoverintent.js
633 ms
magnific.js
736 ms
style.css
653 ms
superfish.js
707 ms
init.js
833 ms
touchswipe.min.js
754 ms
comment-reply.min.js
716 ms
index.js
683 ms
js_composer_front.min.js
674 ms
analytics.js
143 ms
logo1.png
142 ms
frederiksbergmuseerne-small.jpg
167 ms
excelexperten-small.jpg
169 ms
cisternerne-small.jpg
487 ms
taekkemand-bang-small.jpg
486 ms
ny_hjemmeside_lille.png
485 ms
webshop.jpg
486 ms
frederiksbergmuseerne-100x100.jpg
485 ms
silverrudder-100x100.jpg
486 ms
quadrugby-100x100.jpg
614 ms
noiselezz-100x100.jpg
598 ms
excelexperten-100x100.jpg
593 ms
baadnyl-100x100.jpg
619 ms
oemand.dk
636 ms
ny_hjemmeside.png
608 ms
responsive-design.jpg
775 ms
salient-dynamic-styles.css
689 ms
memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsjZ0B4gaVQ.woff
195 ms
memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsjZ0B4uaVQ.woff
344 ms
memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsiH0B4uaVQ.woff
365 ms
memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsgH1x4uaVQ.woff
364 ms
memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsg-1x4uaVQ.woff
364 ms
tss5ApVBdCYD5Q7hcxTE1ArZ0Zz8oY2KRmwvKhhvLFG6o3mq.woff
364 ms
tss5ApVBdCYD5Q7hcxTE1ArZ0Zz8oY2KRmwvKhhvy1a6o3mq.woff
365 ms
fontawesome-webfont.svg
788 ms
icomoon.woff
644 ms
collect
174 ms
collect
323 ms
fontawesome-webfont.woff
158 ms
oemand.dk accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have a discernible name
Best practices
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
Impact
Issue
[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.
oemand.dk best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Missing source maps for large first-party JavaScript
oemand.dk SEO score
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Impact
Issue
Links are not crawlable
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
DA
DA
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Oemand.dk can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that Danish is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Oemand.dk main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
oemand.dk
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Oemand. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: