3.6 sec in total
292 ms
2.8 sec
515 ms
Click here to check amazing Ogilvie content. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about ogilvie.co.uk
A family owned business supporting numerous industries including construction, home-building, vehicle management, IT and surveying.
Visit ogilvie.co.ukWe analyzed Ogilvie.co.uk page load time and found that the first response time was 292 ms and then it took 3.3 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 60% of websites can load faster.
ogilvie.co.uk performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value4.4 s
16/100
10%
Value17.2 s
0/100
25%
Value7.5 s
27/100
10%
Value1,540 ms
13/100
30%
Value0.001
100/100
15%
Value9.6 s
29/100
10%
292 ms
489 ms
80 ms
157 ms
230 ms
Our browser made a total of 67 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 84% of them (56 requests) were addressed to the original Ogilvie.co.uk, 7% (5 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 3% (2 requests) were made to Fonts.googleapis.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (825 ms) belongs to the original domain Ogilvie.co.uk.
Page size can be reduced by 248.5 kB (8%)
3.3 MB
3.0 MB
In fact, the total size of Ogilvie.co.uk main page is 3.3 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 65% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 2.8 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 88.3 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 88.3 kB or 85% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 141.0 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Ogilvie images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 14.1 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.
Potential reduce by 5.2 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Ogilvie.co.uk has all CSS files already compressed.
Number of requests can be reduced by 46 (79%)
58
12
The browser has sent 58 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Ogilvie. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 27 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 21 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
ogilvie.co.uk
292 ms
www.ogilvie.co.uk
489 ms
style-blocks.build.css
80 ms
styles.css
157 ms
dittyDisplays.css
230 ms
all.css
308 ms
grid-system.css
231 ms
style.css
318 ms
element-fancy-box.css
235 ms
css
60 ms
auto-masonry-meta-overlaid-spaced.css
234 ms
responsive.css
312 ms
flickity.css
314 ms
select2.css
329 ms
skin-material.css
330 ms
menu-dynamic.css
383 ms
js_composer.min.css
384 ms
salient-dynamic-styles.css
466 ms
css
55 ms
jquery.min.js
485 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
389 ms
js
78 ms
js
146 ms
umami.js
279 ms
script.js
281 ms
font-awesome.min.css
393 ms
jquery.fancybox.css
458 ms
core.css
457 ms
slide-out-right-material.css
482 ms
index.js
501 ms
index.js
570 ms
register-sw.js
569 ms
dismiss.js
571 ms
jquery.easing.min.js
572 ms
jquery.mousewheel.min.js
570 ms
priority.js
572 ms
transit.min.js
675 ms
waypoints.js
676 ms
imagesLoaded.min.js
677 ms
hoverintent.min.js
676 ms
jquery.fancybox.min.js
763 ms
anime.min.js
677 ms
flickity.min.js
825 ms
superfish.js
752 ms
init.js
800 ms
jquery.flexslider.min.js
615 ms
isotope.min.js
543 ms
nectar-blog.js
603 ms
touchswipe.min.js
647 ms
select2.min.js
686 ms
js_composer_front.min.js
572 ms
White-Logo.png
583 ms
Black-Logo.png
406 ms
L0xjDF02iFML4hGCyOCpRdycFsGxSrqDyx4vEZmv.ttf
86 ms
L0xjDF02iFML4hGCyOCpRdycFsGxSrqD-R4vEZmv.ttf
128 ms
L0xjDF02iFML4hGCyOCpRdycFsGxSrqDlR4vEZmv.ttf
153 ms
L0xjDF02iFML4hGCyOCpRdycFsGxSrqDFRkvEZmv.ttf
154 ms
L0xjDF02iFML4hGCyOCpRdycFsGxSrqDLBkvEZmv.ttf
155 ms
icomoon.woff
404 ms
Homepage-1.jpg
308 ms
Homepage-2.jpg
231 ms
Homepage-3.jpg
315 ms
Homepage-4-1.jpg
308 ms
ND-grey-background-390x485-1.png
241 ms
Home-hero.jpg
610 ms
Home-image-1.jpg
459 ms
Home-image-2.jpg
391 ms
ogilvie.co.uk accessibility score
ARIA
These are opportunities to improve the usage of ARIA in your application which may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
[aria-*] attributes do not match their roles
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have a discernible name
Best practices
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
Impact
Issue
[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.
ogilvie.co.uk best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Browser errors were logged to the console
ogilvie.co.uk SEO score
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Ogilvie.co.uk can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Ogilvie.co.uk main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
ogilvie.co.uk
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Ogilvie. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: