5.7 sec in total
260 ms
4.8 sec
626 ms
Welcome to ondertekenen.nl homepage info - get ready to check Ondertekenen best content for Netherlands right away, or after learning these important things about ondertekenen.nl
Binnen 2 minuten een document met een digitale handtekening getekend. Bij ons is het makkelijk, voordelig en rechtsgeldig.
Visit ondertekenen.nlWe analyzed Ondertekenen.nl page load time and found that the first response time was 260 ms and then it took 5.4 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 75% of websites can load faster.
ondertekenen.nl performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value5.8 s
4/100
10%
Value10.3 s
0/100
25%
Value12.8 s
2/100
10%
Value14,590 ms
0/100
30%
Value0.016
100/100
15%
Value24.9 s
0/100
10%
260 ms
1096 ms
1592 ms
71 ms
94 ms
Our browser made a total of 90 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 66% of them (59 requests) were addressed to the original Ondertekenen.nl, 9% (8 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 4% (4 requests) were made to F.vimeocdn.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.6 sec) belongs to the original domain Ondertekenen.nl.
Page size can be reduced by 788.6 kB (48%)
1.6 MB
851.0 kB
In fact, the total size of Ondertekenen.nl main page is 1.6 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 65% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 739.0 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 31.7 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 31.7 kB or 77% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 80.5 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Ondertekenen needs image optimization as it can save up to 80.5 kB or 13% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.
Potential reduce by 495.6 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 495.6 kB or 67% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 180.8 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Ondertekenen.nl needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 180.8 kB or 81% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 46 (60%)
77
31
The browser has sent 77 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Ondertekenen. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 33 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 15 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
ondertekenen.nl
260 ms
ondertekenen.nl
1096 ms
www.ondertekenen.nl
1592 ms
css
71 ms
style.css
94 ms
easy-modal-site.css
163 ms
styles.css
238 ms
nivo-lightbox.css
239 ms
default.css
243 ms
css
92 ms
genericons.css
320 ms
style.css
244 ms
css
98 ms
font-awesome.min.css
292 ms
owl.carousel.css
253 ms
default.min.css
311 ms
www.ondertekenen.nl
692 ms
jquery.js
480 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
321 ms
nivo-lightbox.min.js
322 ms
script.js
387 ms
gtm4wp-contact-form-7-tracker.js
392 ms
gtm4wp-form-move-tracker.js
400 ms
froogaloop.js
403 ms
gtm4wp-vimeo.js
462 ms
jquery-1.11.3.min.js
553 ms
responsiveslides.min.js
478 ms
jquery.bxslider.min.js
484 ms
jquery.slicknav.min.js
538 ms
jquery.powertip.min.js
555 ms
owl.carousel.min.js
557 ms
main.js
564 ms
core.min.js
613 ms
position.min.js
627 ms
jquery.transit.min.js
632 ms
easy-modal-site.js
634 ms
jquery.form.min.js
644 ms
scripts.js
767 ms
functions.js
846 ms
wp-embed.min.js
846 ms
wp-emoji-release.min.js
774 ms
ga.js
165 ms
w.js
517 ms
fbevents.js
780 ms
background_pattern.jpg
175 ms
site_logo_transparent.png
174 ms
logo-ondertekenen.png
174 ms
menu_bg.png
421 ms
ondertekenen-grote-foto.jpg
791 ms
besparen.png
470 ms
snel.png
581 ms
gemak.png
579 ms
logo-11.png
470 ms
essent.png
577 ms
logo-31.png
623 ms
logo-41.png
623 ms
flex_workflow.png
775 ms
rechtsgeldig.png
621 ms
integratie.png
775 ms
afas.png
777 ms
sap2.png
778 ms
logo-1small.png
791 ms
md.png
790 ms
logo-3small.png
794 ms
j.php
417 ms
147643967
468 ms
0ihfXUL2emPh0ROJezvraKCWcynf_cDxXwCLxiixG1c.ttf
443 ms
OsJ2DjdpjqFRVUSto6IffKCWcynf_cDxXwCLxiixG1c.ttf
467 ms
2Q-AW1e_taO6pHwMXcXW5w.ttf
481 ms
_aijTyevf54tkVDLy-dlnKCWcynf_cDxXwCLxiixG1c.ttf
523 ms
fontawesome-webfont.woff
363 ms
gtm.js
497 ms
ISUraQdBYMI3VoDzBxXqNvesZW2xOQ-xsNqO47m55DA.ttf
407 ms
ohKfORL_YnhBMzkCPoIqwp0EAVxt0G0biEntp43Qt6E.ttf
451 ms
DZ_YjBPqZ88vcZCcIXm6Vp0EAVxt0G0biEntp43Qt6E.ttf
451 ms
OMD20Sg9RTs7sUORCEN-7Z0EAVxt0G0biEntp43Qt6E.ttf
451 ms
bx_loader.gif
394 ms
controls.png
379 ms
v.gif
59 ms
player.js
200 ms
player.css
168 ms
vuid.min.js
197 ms
__utm.gif
92 ms
271 ms
ga-audiences
149 ms
proxy.html
90 ms
550783528.jpg
117 ms
98 ms
wi81yse1
62 ms
intercom.21a35ffd.js
64 ms
ondertekenen.nl accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have a discernible name
Best practices
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
Impact
Issue
[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.
ondertekenen.nl best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Page has valid source maps
ondertekenen.nl SEO score
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Impact
Issue
Links are not crawlable
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
NL
NL
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Ondertekenen.nl can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that Dutch is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Ondertekenen.nl main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
ondertekenen.nl
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Ondertekenen. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: