Access ondertekenen.nl. Digitale handtekening, dé marktleider

Report Summary

About Website

Welcome to ondertekenen.nl homepage info - get ready to check Ondertekenen best content for Netherlands right away, or after learning these important things about ondertekenen.nl

Binnen 2 minuten een document met een digitale handtekening getekend. Bij ons is het makkelijk, voordelig en rechtsgeldig.

Visit ondertekenen.nl

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value4.6 s

13/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value16.8 s

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value10.0 s

9/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value770 ms

38/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.028

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value18.3 s

3/100

10%

ondertekenen.nl

212 ms

www.ondertekenen.nl

571 ms

language-menu.css

184 ms

zebra_tooltips.css

276 ms

front.min.css

287 ms

Our browser made a total of 61 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 85% of them (52 requests) were addressed to the original Ondertekenen.nl, 3% (2 requests) were made to Cdn.jsdelivr.net and 2% (1 request) were made to Fonts.googleapis.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1 sec) belongs to the original domain Ondertekenen.nl.

Content Size

2.2 MB

After Optimization

1.7 MB

In fact, the total size of Ondertekenen.nl main page is 2.2 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 60% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 1.8 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-82%

Potential reduce by 201.8 kB

Original 246.2 kB
After minification 240.7 kB
After compression 44.4 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 201.8 kB or 82% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-14%

Potential reduce by 257.4 kB

Original 1.8 MB
After minification 1.5 MB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Ondertekenen needs image optimization as it can save up to 257.4 kB or 14% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.

JavaScript Optimization

-11%

Potential reduce by 19.7 kB

Original 175.5 kB
After minification 175.5 kB
After compression 155.8 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 19.7 kB or 11% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-15%

Potential reduce by 4.3 kB

Original 29.1 kB
After minification 29.1 kB
After compression 24.8 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Ondertekenen.nl needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 4.3 kB or 15% of the original size.

Requests Now

After Optimization

The browser has sent 53 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Ondertekenen. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 14 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 8 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Accessibility Issues

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

High

Links do not have a discernible name

These items highlight common accessibility best practices.

High

[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.

Areas of Improvement

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Page has valid source maps

Search Engine Optimization Advices

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

High

Links are not crawlable

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

Language Detected

NL
Language Claimed

NL
Encoding

UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Ondertekenen.nl can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that Dutch is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Ondertekenen.nl main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

ondertekenen.nl

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Ondertekenen. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook:

Report Summary

Performance

Accessibility

Best Practices

SEO

Digitale handtekening, dé marktleider - Ondertekenen.nl

Page Load Speed

First Response

Resources Loaded

Page Rendered

About Website

Key Findings

Performance Metrics

Measured Metrics

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

SI (Speed Index)

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

TTI (Time to Interactive)