Tools & Wizards About Us
ononavi.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 29

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    49% of other websites

  • 94

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 83% of websites

  • 67

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    24% of websites

  • 67

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    26% of websites

ononavi.com

おのなび｜広島県尾道市（しまなみ）の観光情報

Page Load Speed

7.5 sec in total

First Response

950 ms

Resources Loaded

6 sec

Page Rendered

508 ms

ononavi.com screenshot

About Website

Click here to check amazing Ononavi content. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about ononavi.com

尾道観光協会「おのなび」がお送りする広島県尾道市(ONOMICHI)（しまなみ）の観光（グルメ、祭り、サイクリング、レジャー、さくら）、名所・観光スポット、歴史、自然、文化、イベントなどの情報です

Visit ononavi.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Ononavi.com page load time and found that the first response time was 950 ms and then it took 6.6 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 80% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

ononavi.com performance score

29

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value2.2 s

77/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value5.0 s

26/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value21.0 s

0/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value52,740 ms

0/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value64.2 s

0/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

ononavi.com

950 ms

base.css

687 ms

delta.css

858 ms

AC_RunActiveContent.js

547 ms

styleswitcher.js

609 ms

Our browser made a total of 84 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 98% of them (82 requests) were addressed to the original Ononavi.com, 2% (2 requests) were made to Google-analytics.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (2.7 sec) belongs to the original domain Ononavi.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 52.3 kB (8%)

Content Size

634.6 kB

After Optimization

582.3 kB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Ononavi.com main page is 634.6 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 20% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 550.0 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-74%

Potential reduce by 14.2 kB

  • Original 19.2 kB
  • After minification 17.4 kB
  • After compression 4.9 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 14.2 kB or 74% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 838 B

  • Original 550.0 kB
  • After minification 549.1 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Ononavi images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-14%

Potential reduce by 3.7 kB

  • Original 26.1 kB
  • After minification 24.9 kB
  • After compression 22.4 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 3.7 kB or 14% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-85%

Potential reduce by 33.6 kB

  • Original 39.4 kB
  • After minification 32.7 kB
  • After compression 5.9 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Ononavi.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 33.6 kB or 85% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 17 (20%)

Requests Now

83

After Optimization

66

  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 83 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Ononavi. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 7 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

ononavi.com

ononavi.com

950 ms

base.css

base.css

687 ms

delta.css

delta.css

858 ms

AC_RunActiveContent.js

AC_RunActiveContent.js

547 ms

styleswitcher.js

styleswitcher.js

609 ms

analytics.js

analytics.js

28 ms

mainbg.gif

mainbg.gif

200 ms

wrapbg.gif

wrapbg.gif

174 ms

navibg.jpg

navibg.jpg

346 ms

category1.gif

category1.gif

408 ms

btn1a.gif

btn1a.gif

185 ms

btn2a.gif

btn2a.gif

344 ms

btn3a.gif

btn3a.gif

368 ms

btn4a.gif

btn4a.gif

554 ms

btn5a.gif

btn5a.gif

394 ms

btn6a.gif

btn6a.gif

515 ms

btn7a.gif

btn7a.gif

517 ms

category2.gif

category2.gif

549 ms

btnaa.gif

btnaa.gif

592 ms

btnba.gif

btnba.gif

610 ms

btnca.gif

btnca.gif

686 ms

btnda.gif

btnda.gif

687 ms

btnea.gif

btnea.gif

730 ms

btnfa.gif

btnfa.gif

737 ms

btnga.gif

btnga.gif

789 ms

btnha.gif

btnha.gif

811 ms

bnr_pmh.jpg

bnr_pmh.jpg

1028 ms

inqbtn.jpg

inqbtn.jpg

1031 ms

bnr_jnto.gif

bnr_jnto.gif

911 ms

visitjapan.gif

visitjapan.gif

1108 ms

title.jpg

title.jpg

1184 ms

lang2a.jpg

lang2a.jpg

1013 ms

lang1b.jpg

lang1b.jpg

1095 ms

lang3a.jpg

lang3a.jpg

1215 ms

lang4a.jpg

lang4a.jpg

1199 ms

lang5a.jpg

lang5a.jpg

1202 ms

bgico1.gif

bgico1.gif

1276 ms

bgico2.gif

bgico2.gif

1293 ms

bgico3.gif

bgico3.gif

1379 ms

bgico4.gif

bgico4.gif

1369 ms

bgico5.gif

bgico5.gif

1373 ms

flashimg.jpg

flashimg.jpg

2662 ms

collect

collect

15 ms

movie_thumb.jpg

movie_thumb.jpg

1473 ms

tag6.jpg

tag6.jpg

1483 ms

movie_img.jpg

movie_img.jpg

1520 ms

bnr_access.jpg

bnr_access.jpg

1377 ms

tagb.jpg

tagb.jpg

1674 ms

mc_tag.gif

mc_tag.gif

1461 ms

rankbg.jpg

rankbg.jpg

1458 ms

rank1.jpg

rank1.jpg

1483 ms

rankbtm.gif

rankbtm.gif

1376 ms

tage.jpg

tage.jpg

1675 ms

exp_tag.gif

exp_tag.gif

1489 ms

expbg.jpg

expbg.jpg

1507 ms

arrow.jpg

arrow.jpg

1471 ms

expbtm.gif

expbtm.gif

1605 ms

tagg.jpg

tagg.jpg

1720 ms

acom_bg.jpg

acom_bg.jpg

1716 ms

acm_btn.jpg

acm_btn.jpg

1505 ms

contc_bg1.jpg

contc_bg1.jpg

2000 ms

contc_btn1.jpg

contc_btn1.jpg

1622 ms

contc_btn2.jpg

contc_btn2.jpg

1595 ms

contc_btn3.jpg

contc_btn3.jpg

1663 ms

arrow1.jpg

arrow1.jpg

1577 ms

spacer.gif

spacer.gif

1549 ms

contb_bg1.jpg

contb_bg1.jpg

1973 ms

contb_btn1.jpg

contb_btn1.jpg

1650 ms

contb_btn2.jpg

contb_btn2.jpg

1640 ms

contb_btn3.jpg

contb_btn3.jpg

1592 ms

conte_bg1.jpg

conte_bg1.jpg

2291 ms

conte_btn1.jpg

conte_btn1.jpg

1730 ms

conte_btn2.jpg

conte_btn2.jpg

1880 ms

conte_btn3.jpg

conte_btn3.jpg

1650 ms

cont2_bg1.jpg

cont2_bg1.jpg

2036 ms

contf_bg1.jpg

contf_bg1.jpg

2243 ms

contf_btn4.jpg

contf_btn4.jpg

1742 ms

pgtop.jpg

pgtop.jpg

1820 ms

btmlogo.jpg

btmlogo.jpg

1800 ms

bg1.css

bg1.css

199 ms

bg2.css

bg2.css

199 ms

bg3.css

bg3.css

199 ms

bg4.css

bg4.css

199 ms

bg5.css

bg5.css

199 ms

Accessibility Review

ononavi.com accessibility score

94

Accessibility Issues

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

<object> elements do not have alternate text

Best Practices

ononavi.com best practices score

67

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Serves images with low resolution

General

Impact

Issue

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

SEO Factors

ononavi.com SEO score

67

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses plugins

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Ononavi.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Ononavi.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

ononavi.com

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Ononavi. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: