5.2 sec in total
248 ms
4.6 sec
375 ms
Visit opendatasecurity.co.uk now to see the best up-to-date Open Data Security content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about opendatasecurity.co.uk
Pen test your infrastructure & train your staff with us to avoid becoming a cyber attack victim. We offer services for enterprises and organizations.
Visit opendatasecurity.co.ukWe analyzed Opendatasecurity.co.uk page load time and found that the first response time was 248 ms and then it took 4.9 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 75% of websites can load faster.
opendatasecurity.co.uk performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value4.7 s
13/100
10%
Value9.7 s
0/100
25%
Value6.3 s
42/100
10%
Value740 ms
40/100
30%
Value0.135
80/100
15%
Value8.8 s
35/100
10%
248 ms
983 ms
481 ms
448 ms
39 ms
Our browser made a total of 73 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 93% of them (68 requests) were addressed to the original Opendatasecurity.co.uk, 4% (3 requests) were made to Googletagmanager.com and 3% (2 requests) were made to Google-analytics.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (2 sec) belongs to the original domain Opendatasecurity.co.uk.
Page size can be reduced by 609.4 kB (22%)
2.8 MB
2.2 MB
In fact, the total size of Opendatasecurity.co.uk main page is 2.8 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 55% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 2.2 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 90.3 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 90.3 kB or 80% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 447.2 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Open Data Security needs image optimization as it can save up to 447.2 kB or 20% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.
Potential reduce by 41.4 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 41.4 kB or 13% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 30.5 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Opendatasecurity.co.uk needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 30.5 kB or 22% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 42 (59%)
71
29
The browser has sent 71 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Open Data Security. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 35 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 9 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
opendatasecurity.co.uk
248 ms
opendatasecurity.co.uk
983 ms
webfont.js
481 ms
wp-emoji-release.min.js
448 ms
style.min.css
39 ms
styles.css
21 ms
settings.css
450 ms
style.css
454 ms
style.css
53 ms
js_composer.min.css
72 ms
shortcodes.css
606 ms
responsive.css
88 ms
Defaults.css
90 ms
jquery.min.js
96 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
105 ms
jquery.themepunch.tools.min.js
120 ms
jquery.themepunch.revolution.min.js
130 ms
wp-polyfill.min.js
76 ms
i18n.min.js
88 ms
lodash.min.js
98 ms
url.min.js
107 ms
hooks.min.js
120 ms
api-fetch.min.js
129 ms
index.js
138 ms
uk-cookie-consent-js.js
148 ms
jquery.easing.min.js
157 ms
waypoints.min.js
168 ms
waypoints-sticky.min.js
182 ms
prettyPhoto.js
192 ms
isotope.pkgd.min.js
201 ms
functions.js
214 ms
flexslider.min.js
224 ms
smoothscroll.js
235 ms
comment-reply.min.js
246 ms
wp-embed.min.js
270 ms
js_composer_front.min.js
283 ms
lazyload.min.js
290 ms
gtm.js
78 ms
wp-polyfill-fetch.min.js
439 ms
wp-polyfill-dom-rect.min.js
441 ms
wp-polyfill-url.min.js
544 ms
wp-polyfill-formdata.min.js
442 ms
wp-polyfill-element-closest.min.js
441 ms
js
55 ms
analytics.js
18 ms
collect
13 ms
js
82 ms
logo_transparent.png
539 ms
ODS-white-shield.png
434 ms
down-arrow.gif
648 ms
40.png
428 ms
2.png
11 ms
13.png
427 ms
4.png
20 ms
5.png
30 ms
6.png
466 ms
7.png
884 ms
8.png
864 ms
ISO-27001.jpg
1079 ms
seguridad-gestionada.png
1430 ms
DDoS-Attack-Protection.png
1564 ms
twitter.png
1074 ms
linkedin.png
1301 ms
youtube.png
1313 ms
catalogo-sello.png
1623 ms
BW_photo_1.jpg
1839 ms
verde.png
1738 ms
verde1-1.png
1747 ms
dots-background-desktop.png
1450 ms
BW_photo_2.jpg
1463 ms
negro.png
1894 ms
verde3.png
1576 ms
verde2.png
2012 ms
opendatasecurity.co.uk accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Form elements do not have associated labels
Links do not have a discernible name
Best practices
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
Impact
Issue
[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.
opendatasecurity.co.uk best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Serves images with low resolution
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
opendatasecurity.co.uk SEO score
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have descriptive text
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Opendatasecurity.co.uk can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Opendatasecurity.co.uk main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
opendatasecurity.co.uk
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Open Data Security. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: