Tools & Wizards About Us
optifuse.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 65

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    78% of other websites

  • 98

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 94% of websites

  • 83

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    55% of websites

  • 90

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    68% of websites

optifuse.com

Homepage | OptiFuse

Page Load Speed

5.5 sec in total

First Response

49 ms

Resources Loaded

4.7 sec

Page Rendered

776 ms

optifuse.com screenshot

About Website

Click here to check amazing Opti Fuse content. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about optifuse.com

Visit optifuse.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Optifuse.com page load time and found that the first response time was 49 ms and then it took 5.5 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 75% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

optifuse.com performance score

65

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value2.2 s

76/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value2.6 s

87/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value13.6 s

2/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value550 ms

53/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.05

99/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value7.7 s

45/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

optifuse.com

49 ms

optifuse.com

41 ms

www.optifuse.com

4286 ms

gtm.js

73 ms

fa4945832564c5ab03aa.css

29 ms

Our browser made a total of 35 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 97% of them (34 requests) were addressed to the original Optifuse.com, 3% (1 request) were made to Googletagmanager.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (4.3 sec) belongs to the original domain Optifuse.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 118.2 kB (56%)

Content Size

210.0 kB

After Optimization

91.7 kB

  • HTML
  • JavaScript

In fact, the total size of Optifuse.com main page is 210.0 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 45% of websites need less resources to load. HTML takes 209.3 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-56%

Potential reduce by 118.2 kB

  • Original 209.3 kB
  • After minification 209.2 kB
  • After compression 91.1 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 118.2 kB or 56% of the original size.

JavaScript Optimization

-3%

Potential reduce by 17 B

  • Original 655 B
  • After minification 655 B
  • After compression 638 B

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 30 (94%)

Requests Now

32

After Optimization

2

  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 32 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Opti Fuse. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 24 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 8 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

optifuse.com

optifuse.com

49 ms

optifuse.com

optifuse.com

41 ms

www.optifuse.com

www.optifuse.com

4286 ms

gtm.js

gtm.js

73 ms

fa4945832564c5ab03aa.css

fa4945832564c5ab03aa.css

29 ms

76bc26a8d665b41090aa.css

76bc26a8d665b41090aa.css

32 ms

1cf9497876d4efe0ff7a.css

1cf9497876d4efe0ff7a.css

26 ms

94081c27c1c514a1baac.css

94081c27c1c514a1baac.css

34 ms

b359747af70112c9fb44.css

b359747af70112c9fb44.css

48 ms

16ed0e198dbed58cc1a4.css

16ed0e198dbed58cc1a4.css

45 ms

ec3466703007198f1135.css

ec3466703007198f1135.css

37 ms

6668c9986fddb6afcb9b.css

6668c9986fddb6afcb9b.css

47 ms

polyfills-a40ef1678bae11e696dba45124eadd70.js

polyfills-a40ef1678bae11e696dba45124eadd70.js

41 ms

4263.04804bf30c5ebc496e1c.js

4263.04804bf30c5ebc496e1c.js

51 ms

1733.fd6a06a39a6d92c9992b.js

1733.fd6a06a39a6d92c9992b.js

50 ms

4844.c3a45f93cf0032de05ef.js

4844.c3a45f93cf0032de05ef.js

53 ms

3207.36524655c165c3252129.js

3207.36524655c165c3252129.js

58 ms

1611.20b531bab8b3c3c35309.js

1611.20b531bab8b3c3c35309.js

53 ms

6964.b2fb7a5020ced74478a7.js

6964.b2fb7a5020ced74478a7.js

59 ms

5197.8597c8831d291a6e2e6b.js

5197.8597c8831d291a6e2e6b.js

60 ms

9480.3fafda69a07e68252a8e.js

9480.3fafda69a07e68252a8e.js

86 ms

2313.ba20605a30c650b81df6.js

2313.ba20605a30c650b81df6.js

88 ms

3164.a27cfba8a08b46789467.js

3164.a27cfba8a08b46789467.js

87 ms

112.25cb63002e50c46bcb2a.js

112.25cb63002e50c46bcb2a.js

85 ms

webpack-e098530af52eecb51cc2.js

webpack-e098530af52eecb51cc2.js

87 ms

framework-343071264e57376541e3.js

framework-343071264e57376541e3.js

88 ms

main-d63616ac3c161e9f5fba.js

main-d63616ac3c161e9f5fba.js

90 ms

_app-285b1c1c0d2a1272f235.js

_app-285b1c1c0d2a1272f235.js

90 ms

29107295-8859b764797d131a0f8a.js

29107295-8859b764797d131a0f8a.js

89 ms

5505-994d4b50eb2d84eeb922.js

5505-994d4b50eb2d84eeb922.js

89 ms

4927-03070174ce289509b058.js

4927-03070174ce289509b058.js

105 ms

index-9f97bc34bc8a21cd4701.js

index-9f97bc34bc8a21cd4701.js

105 ms

_buildManifest.js

_buildManifest.js

106 ms

_ssgManifest.js

_ssgManifest.js

105 ms

email-decode.min.js

email-decode.min.js

7 ms

Accessibility Review

optifuse.com accessibility score

98

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Best Practices

optifuse.com best practices score

83

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

SEO Factors

optifuse.com SEO score

90

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    ES

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Optifuse.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it does not match the claimed Spanish language. Our system also found out that Optifuse.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

optifuse.com

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Opti Fuse. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: