Tools & Wizards About Us
optionmatrix.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 14

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    26% of other websites

  • 69

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 34% of websites

  • 67

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    24% of websites

  • 75

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    32% of websites

optionmatrix.com

Option Matrix | Custom Software Development | Digital Transformation

Page Load Speed

3 sec in total

First Response

537 ms

Resources Loaded

1.6 sec

Page Rendered

841 ms

optionmatrix.com screenshot

About Website

Visit optionmatrix.com now to see the best up-to-date Option Matrix content for India and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about optionmatrix.com

We are a digital transformation firm with project office in Canada since 2018 and development center in India since 2002. We offer custom web/mobile software development to automate proprietary busine...

Visit optionmatrix.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Optionmatrix.com page load time and found that the first response time was 537 ms and then it took 2.4 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 45% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

optionmatrix.com performance score

14

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value5.5 s

6/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value10.5 s

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value14.9 s

1/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value11,530 ms

0/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.095

91/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value42.3 s

0/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

optionmatrix.com

537 ms

jquery.min.js

34 ms

bootstrap.min.js

34 ms

style.css

87 ms

bootstrap.min.css

56 ms

Our browser made a total of 43 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 84% of them (36 requests) were addressed to the original Optionmatrix.com, 7% (3 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 5% (2 requests) were made to Maxcdn.bootstrapcdn.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (878 ms) belongs to the original domain Optionmatrix.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 954.7 kB (11%)

Content Size

8.5 MB

After Optimization

7.6 MB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Optionmatrix.com main page is 8.5 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 55% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 7.5 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-82%

Potential reduce by 44.6 kB

  • Original 54.2 kB
  • After minification 37.6 kB
  • After compression 9.6 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 16.6 kB, which is 31% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 44.6 kB or 82% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-2%

Potential reduce by 185.4 kB

  • Original 7.5 MB
  • After minification 7.3 MB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Option Matrix images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-58%

Potential reduce by 211.0 kB

  • Original 363.2 kB
  • After minification 361.1 kB
  • After compression 152.2 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 211.0 kB or 58% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-84%

Potential reduce by 513.7 kB

  • Original 609.4 kB
  • After minification 530.8 kB
  • After compression 95.7 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Optionmatrix.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 513.7 kB or 84% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 7 (18%)

Requests Now

38

After Optimization

31

  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 38 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Option Matrix. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 4 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 5 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

optionmatrix.com

optionmatrix.com

537 ms

jquery.min.js

jquery.min.js

34 ms

bootstrap.min.js

bootstrap.min.js

34 ms

style.css

style.css

87 ms

bootstrap.min.css

bootstrap.min.css

56 ms

custom.css

custom.css

149 ms

css

css

75 ms

font-awesome.min.css

font-awesome.min.css

146 ms

main.js

main.js

236 ms

scrolltop.js

scrolltop.js

168 ms

black-logo.png

black-logo.png

117 ms

skype-1.jpg

skype-1.jpg

369 ms

skype-2.jpg

skype-2.jpg

323 ms

img4.jpg

img4.jpg

323 ms

img2.jpg

img2.jpg

289 ms

img3.jpg

img3.jpg

350 ms

img1.jpg

img1.jpg

392 ms

OM_Office_Photo.jpg

OM_Office_Photo.jpg

349 ms

automation.jpg

automation.jpg

463 ms

manufacturing.PNG

manufacturing.PNG

535 ms

bigstock-A-house-under-construction-wi-472847471.jpg

bigstock-A-house-under-construction-wi-472847471.jpg

679 ms

fintest.jpg

fintest.jpg

473 ms

validate@2x.png

validate@2x.png

423 ms

bridge@2x.png

bridge@2x.png

464 ms

test@2x.png

test@2x.png

500 ms

optionmatrix_recruitment_2017.jpg

optionmatrix_recruitment_2017.jpg

609 ms

client-1.png

client-1.png

540 ms

client-3.png

client-3.png

546 ms

client-5.png

client-5.png

572 ms

desk.jpg

desk.jpg

513 ms

careers1.jpg

careers1.jpg

513 ms

pricing-bg.png

pricing-bg.png

517 ms

bg.jpg

bg.jpg

542 ms

cmmi-1.jpg

cmmi-1.jpg

578 ms

cmmi-2.jpg

cmmi-2.jpg

598 ms

cmmi-3.jpg

cmmi-3.jpg

584 ms

table.png

table.png

878 ms

f_bg1.png

f_bg1.png

615 ms

square_bullet.png

square_bullet.png

643 ms

ODelI1aHBYDBqgeIAH2zlNzbP97U9sKh0jjxbPbfOKg.ttf

ODelI1aHBYDBqgeIAH2zlNzbP97U9sKh0jjxbPbfOKg.ttf

44 ms

toadOcfmlt9b38dHJxOBGMw1o1eFRj7wYC6JbISqOjY.ttf

toadOcfmlt9b38dHJxOBGMw1o1eFRj7wYC6JbISqOjY.ttf

68 ms

toadOcfmlt9b38dHJxOBGLsbIrGiHa6JIepkyt5c0A0.ttf

toadOcfmlt9b38dHJxOBGLsbIrGiHa6JIepkyt5c0A0.ttf

68 ms

fontawesome-webfont.woff

fontawesome-webfont.woff

510 ms

Accessibility Review

optionmatrix.com accessibility score

69

Accessibility Issues

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Buttons do not have an accessible name

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

[id] attributes on active, focusable elements are not unique

ARIA

These are opportunities to improve the usage of ARIA in your application which may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

ARIA IDs are not unique

Tables and lists

These are opportunities to improve the experience of reading tabular or list data using assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Lists do not contain only <li> elements and script supporting elements (<script> and <template>).

Best Practices

optionmatrix.com best practices score

67

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Displays images with incorrect aspect ratio

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

High

Page has valid source maps

SEO Factors

optionmatrix.com SEO score

75

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have descriptive text

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Links are not crawlable

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Optionmatrix.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Optionmatrix.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

optionmatrix.com

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Option Matrix. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: