2.7 sec in total
72 ms
2.1 sec
507 ms
Click here to check amazing OSMOZ content for Iran. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about osmoz.com
Talk about your favourite perfumes, hunt down your next fragrance and win numerous gifts on OSMOZ!
Visit osmoz.comWe analyzed Osmoz.com page load time and found that the first response time was 72 ms and then it took 2.7 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 50% of websites can load faster.
osmoz.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value3.8 s
27/100
10%
Value13.8 s
0/100
25%
Value10.1 s
9/100
10%
Value1,200 ms
21/100
30%
Value0.002
100/100
15%
Value19.6 s
2/100
10%
72 ms
142 ms
158 ms
18 ms
41 ms
Our browser made a total of 80 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 75% of them (60 requests) were addressed to the original Osmoz.com, 11% (9 requests) were made to Static.xx.fbcdn.net and 4% (3 requests) were made to Ssl.google-analytics.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.1 sec) belongs to the original domain Osmoz.com.
Page size can be reduced by 433.8 kB (13%)
3.2 MB
2.8 MB
In fact, the total size of Osmoz.com main page is 3.2 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 70% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 3.0 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 83.2 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 16.6 kB, which is 16% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 83.2 kB or 80% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 346.0 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, OSMOZ needs image optimization as it can save up to 346.0 kB or 11% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.
Potential reduce by 2.1 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.
Potential reduce by 2.6 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Osmoz.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 2.6 kB or 11% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 24 (33%)
72
48
The browser has sent 72 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of OSMOZ. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 17 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.
osmoz.com
72 ms
osmoz.com
142 ms
www.osmoz.com
158 ms
jquery.js
18 ms
global.css
41 ms
home.js
165 ms
js
91 ms
facebook.init.js
55 ms
all.js
59 ms
site.un.js
162 ms
all.js
48 ms
ga.js
72 ms
line.jpg
118 ms
logo_sprite.png
122 ms
arrow_header.png
168 ms
search_picto.png
176 ms
power.png
118 ms
best_cologne_for_men_6364004006_448e105b2c.jpg
164 ms
shadow_une.png
319 ms
arrow_r.png
321 ms
coffee_scented_candles_c3bcbb19d3.jpg
317 ms
black_shadow1.png
321 ms
scented_sachets_07d021bffd.jpg
324 ms
apple_blossom_scented_candles_48ecb3db7d.jpg
324 ms
black_shadow2.png
352 ms
eye.png
614 ms
orange_scented_candles_c287ff98b3.jpg
483 ms
perfume_big.jpg
454 ms
fragrance_capricci_nina_ricci_48cf71aafa.jpg
435 ms
white_shadow.png
500 ms
6a309b73.jpg
480 ms
5545968e.jpg
552 ms
101c2233.jpg
586 ms
801836c7.jpg
599 ms
f3fcfafd.jpg
657 ms
b09bc3a6.jpg
628 ms
8ffdbf87.jpg
668 ms
4e7a40d8.gif
1011 ms
bfea18da.jpg
718 ms
2f5fa70b.jpg
718 ms
arrow2.png
750 ms
fd8750ef.jpg
777 ms
member_small.jpg
778 ms
36e43df9.jpg
834 ms
2059221_original.jpg
831 ms
narciso_poudre_4a18c0b309.jpg
869 ms
64461_b2d6309f15.jpg
910 ms
m9511405_p1977044_princ_hero_4762901904.jpg
868 ms
advertising.js
102 ms
__utm.gif
11 ms
__utm.gif
23 ms
like_box.php
96 ms
Novecentowide-Medium-webfont.woff
833 ms
Novecentowide-DemiBold-webfont.woff
836 ms
SinkinSans-200XLight-webfont.woff
872 ms
collect
27 ms
SinkinSans-500Medium-webfont.woff
862 ms
arrow_l.png
913 ms
gzCy-hx--rE.css
22 ms
x6r42IOOUZz.js
27 ms
xjg1QNQguf-.js
25 ms
O9zq51FKpXz.js
25 ms
qnn7MVQZYOT.js
25 ms
qwSlV7K_jlE.js
23 ms
zYzGplAqD4J.js
56 ms
p55HfXW__mM.js
57 ms
304843289_514763520652222_1539993805453196142_n.jpg
35 ms
304945382_514763523985555_6191127465369199982_n.jpg
12 ms
UXtr_j2Fwe-.png
10 ms
member_big.jpg
748 ms
2096799_44e9633181.jpg
747 ms
2006833_4babe98a63.jpg
793 ms
2088257_c665fd409d.jpg
811 ms
2058643_47cc6013dd.jpg
822 ms
2144796_6c2b63a677.jpg
857 ms
2100853_ed0a8dc7ee.jpg
893 ms
2112999_474fb9c5ea.jpg
854 ms
osmoz_logo.png
1074 ms
footer_icon.png
834 ms
main.js
237 ms
osmoz.com accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have a discernible name
Best practices
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
Impact
Issue
[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.
osmoz.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Missing source maps for large first-party JavaScript
osmoz.com SEO score
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have descriptive text
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Impact
Issue
Links are not crawlable
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Osmoz.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Osmoz.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
osmoz.com
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of OSMOZ. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: