Tools & Wizards About Us
oxbird.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 21

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    39% of other websites

  • 84

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 56% of websites

  • 83

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    55% of websites

  • 86

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    60% of websites

oxbird.com

Oxbird

Page Load Speed

1 sec in total

First Response

213 ms

Resources Loaded

741 ms

Page Rendered

59 ms

oxbird.com screenshot

About Website

Welcome to oxbird.com homepage info - get ready to check Oxbird best content for United States right away, or after learning these important things about oxbird.com

Experience paid media fulfillment like never before with oxbird – a leading white label PPC provider. No amateurs, offshoring, or robots. Benefit from expertise, cost reduction, and unmatched product ...

Visit oxbird.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Oxbird.com page load time and found that the first response time was 213 ms and then it took 800 ms to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 15% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

oxbird.com performance score

21

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value3.5 s

34/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value7.6 s

4/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value15.3 s

1/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value2,660 ms

4/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.035

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value24.7 s

0/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

oxbird.com

213 ms

jquery.min.js

35 ms

jquery-migrate.min.js

66 ms

acf.min.js

75 ms

nfpluginsettings.js

75 ms

Our browser made a total of 30 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 90% of them (27 requests) were addressed to the original Oxbird.com, 7% (2 requests) were made to Unpkg.com and 3% (1 request) were made to Googletagmanager.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (231 ms) belongs to the original domain Oxbird.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 2.0 MB (43%)

Content Size

4.7 MB

After Optimization

2.7 MB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Oxbird.com main page is 4.7 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 50% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 3.0 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-90%

Potential reduce by 1.0 MB

  • Original 1.2 MB
  • After minification 1.1 MB
  • After compression 119.3 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 1.0 MB or 90% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-30%

Potential reduce by 900.5 kB

  • Original 3.0 MB
  • After minification 2.1 MB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Oxbird needs image optimization as it can save up to 900.5 kB or 30% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.

JavaScript Optimization

-11%

Potential reduce by 29.1 kB

  • Original 270.2 kB
  • After minification 270.2 kB
  • After compression 241.1 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 29.1 kB or 11% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-24%

Potential reduce by 74.4 kB

  • Original 313.0 kB
  • After minification 312.3 kB
  • After compression 238.6 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Oxbird.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 74.4 kB or 24% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 25 (89%)

Requests Now

28

After Optimization

3

  • Images
  • JavaScript

The browser has sent 28 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Oxbird. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 26 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

oxbird.com

oxbird.com

213 ms

jquery.min.js

jquery.min.js

35 ms

jquery-migrate.min.js

jquery-migrate.min.js

66 ms

acf.min.js

acf.min.js

75 ms

nfpluginsettings.js

nfpluginsettings.js

75 ms

underscore.min.js

underscore.min.js

75 ms

backbone.min.js

backbone.min.js

76 ms

front-end-deps.js

front-end-deps.js

98 ms

front-end.js

front-end.js

98 ms

front-end.js

front-end.js

143 ms

theme-color-switcher.js

theme-color-switcher.js

102 ms

apbct-public-bundle.min.js

apbct-public-bundle.min.js

147 ms

ct-bot-detector-wrapper.js

ct-bot-detector-wrapper.js

146 ms

lottie-player.js

lottie-player.js

31 ms

preloader.js

preloader.js

152 ms

vendor.js

vendor.js

163 ms

main.js

main.js

162 ms

section-header.js

section-header.js

162 ms

section-intro.js

section-intro.js

161 ms

section-our-team.js

section-our-team.js

151 ms

section-testimonials.js

section-testimonials.js

226 ms

section-services.js

section-services.js

227 ms

section-our-process.js

section-our-process.js

227 ms

section-value-prop.js

section-value-prop.js

226 ms

section-contact.js

section-contact.js

225 ms

lazyload.min.js

lazyload.min.js

231 ms

lottie-player.js

lottie-player.js

35 ms

gtm.js

gtm.js

132 ms

testimonials-bg-light.svg

testimonials-bg-light.svg

95 ms

value-prop-bg-light.svg

value-prop-bg-light.svg

93 ms

Accessibility Review

oxbird.com accessibility score

84

Accessibility Issues

ARIA

These are opportunities to improve the usage of ARIA in your application which may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Elements with an ARIA [role] that require children to contain a specific [role] are missing some or all of those required children.

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Buttons do not have an accessible name

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Best Practices

oxbird.com best practices score

83

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

High

Page has valid source maps

SEO Factors

oxbird.com SEO score

86

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have descriptive text

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Links are not crawlable

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Oxbird.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Oxbird.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

oxbird.com

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Oxbird. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: