5.5 sec in total
48 ms
4.7 sec
818 ms
Visit performancescoring.com now to see the best up-to-date Performance Scoring content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about performancescoring.com
Elevate team productivity with Performance Scoring. Streamline meetings, enhance collaboration, integrated seamlessly with loved tech tools.
Visit performancescoring.comWe analyzed Performancescoring.com page load time and found that the first response time was 48 ms and then it took 5.5 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 75% of websites can load faster.
performancescoring.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value3.6 s
31/100
10%
Value7.5 s
4/100
25%
Value13.5 s
2/100
10%
Value2,040 ms
7/100
30%
Value0.042
99/100
15%
Value17.3 s
4/100
10%
48 ms
3105 ms
61 ms
303 ms
297 ms
Our browser made a total of 120 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 48% of them (57 requests) were addressed to the original Performancescoring.com, 30% (36 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 14% (17 requests) were made to B3285066.smushcdn.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (3.1 sec) belongs to the original domain Performancescoring.com.
Page size can be reduced by 336.4 kB (25%)
1.4 MB
1.0 MB
In fact, the total size of Performancescoring.com main page is 1.4 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 80% of websites need less resources to load and that’s why Accessify’s recommendations for optimization and resource minification can be helpful for this project. Javascripts take 685.9 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 170.5 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 170.5 kB or 83% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 1.3 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Performance Scoring images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 118.8 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 118.8 kB or 17% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 45.8 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Performancescoring.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 45.8 kB or 38% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 59 (75%)
79
20
The browser has sent 79 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Performance Scoring. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 39 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 22 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
performancescoring.com
48 ms
performancescoring.com
3105 ms
js
61 ms
index.min.css
303 ms
main.min.css
297 ms
magnific_popup.css
299 ms
animate.css
304 ms
magnific-popup.min.css
307 ms
core.min.css
206 ms
et-divi-dynamic-tb-241477-tb-241478-240880-late.css
293 ms
et-divi-dynamic-tb-241477-tb-241478-240880.css
387 ms
style.min.css
472 ms
app.min.css
386 ms
style.min.css
391 ms
style.min.css
481 ms
frontend-gtag.min.js
392 ms
jquery.min.js
644 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
477 ms
js
78 ms
et-core-unified-tb-241477-tb-241478-240880.min.css
478 ms
et-core-unified-240880.min.css
478 ms
mediaelementplayer-legacy.min.css
446 ms
wp-mediaelement.min.css
448 ms
style.min.css
453 ms
style.min.css
453 ms
swiper.min.css
455 ms
diplSwiper.min.css
665 ms
style.min.css
665 ms
popup.min.js
665 ms
main.min.js
665 ms
6529267.js
91 ms
magnific-popup.js
666 ms
main.min.js
701 ms
dtq-default-vb.js
701 ms
scripts.min.js
734 ms
es6-promise.auto.min.js
700 ms
api.js
40 ms
recaptcha.js
700 ms
jquery.fitvids.js
700 ms
frontend-bundle.min.js
806 ms
wp-polyfill-inert.min.js
805 ms
regenerator-runtime.min.js
804 ms
wp-polyfill.min.js
873 ms
hooks.min.js
632 ms
i18n.min.js
650 ms
app.min.js
700 ms
frontend-bundle.min.js
695 ms
frontend-bundle.min.js
690 ms
common.js
695 ms
smush-lazy-load.min.js
643 ms
mediaelement-and-player.min.js
931 ms
mediaelement-migrate.min.js
692 ms
wp-mediaelement.min.js
691 ms
dipl-tabs-custom.min.js
610 ms
swiper.min.js
657 ms
dipl-logo-slider-custom.min.js
686 ms
sticky-elements.js
819 ms
js
159 ms
video-screenshot.png
183 ms
PS-Octigon_3.png
190 ms
logo-webb.png
173 ms
logo-usclaims.jpg
179 ms
logo-fleetserve.png
181 ms
logo-native-services.jpg
206 ms
logo-swfunding.png
206 ms
logo-jdmdigital.png
206 ms
logo-integritycabinets.png
258 ms
logo-wild-west-storage.jpg
238 ms
logo-estates.png
211 ms
logo-emergency-plumbing-services.jpg
253 ms
pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLCz7V1g.woff
73 ms
pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLCz7V1s.ttf
83 ms
pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLDD4V1g.woff
111 ms
pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLDD4V1s.ttf
102 ms
pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLBT5V1g.woff
112 ms
pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLBT5V1s.ttf
113 ms
pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLEj6V1g.woff
112 ms
pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLEj6V1s.ttf
112 ms
pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLGT9V1g.woff
113 ms
pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLGT9V1s.ttf
113 ms
pxiEyp8kv8JHgFVrFJM.woff
123 ms
pxiEyp8kv8JHgFVrFJA.ttf
122 ms
pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLDz8V1g.woff
124 ms
pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLDz8V1s.ttf
123 ms
pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLFj_V1g.woff
124 ms
pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLFj_V1s.ttf
128 ms
pxiGyp8kv8JHgFVrLPTedA.woff
128 ms
pxiGyp8kv8JHgFVrLPTedw.ttf
126 ms
JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCtZ6Ew9.woff
127 ms
JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCtZ6Ew-.ttf
126 ms
JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCtr6Ew9.woff
127 ms
JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCtr6Ew-.ttf
141 ms
JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCs16Ew9.woff
139 ms
JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCs16Ew-.ttf
140 ms
JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCvr6Ew9.woff
140 ms
JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCvr6Ew-.ttf
141 ms
JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCtr6Uw9.woff
140 ms
JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCtr6Uw-.ttf
146 ms
JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCu170w9.woff
145 ms
JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCu170w-.ttf
146 ms
JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCuM70w9.woff
142 ms
JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCuM70w-.ttf
142 ms
JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCvr70w9.woff
145 ms
JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCvr70w-.ttf
156 ms
JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCvC70w9.woff
154 ms
JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCvC70w-.ttf
155 ms
modules.woff
511 ms
modules.woff
390 ms
Perspective-Row-768.png
167 ms
edgar-thumbnail.jpg
137 ms
ps-meetings-video-thumb.jpg
148 ms
Tack.png
163 ms
et-divi-dynamic-tb-241477-tb-241478-240880-late.css
411 ms
6529267.js
213 ms
banner.js
227 ms
collectedforms.js
226 ms
recaptcha__en.js
197 ms
PS-Logo-sized.png
162 ms
PAJJhLM6sSoWKfWCAAwDAjgbRAAB42mNgYGBkAIIbCZo5IPrmUn0hGA0AO8EFTQAA
48 ms
PS-Logo-sized.png
103 ms
performancescoring.com accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have a discernible name
Best practices
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
Impact
Issue
[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.
performancescoring.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Browser errors were logged to the console
Page has valid source maps
performancescoring.com SEO score
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Performancescoring.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Performancescoring.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
performancescoring.com
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Performance Scoring. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: