3.2 sec in total
469 ms
2.5 sec
216 ms
Welcome to perimetersecurity.co.uk homepage info - get ready to check Perimeter Security best content right away, or after learning these important things about perimetersecurity.co.uk
Perimeter Security Ltd. The scaffold alarm and construction site security specialists. Wireless installation, affordable weekly hire, 24 hour response.
Visit perimetersecurity.co.ukWe analyzed Perimetersecurity.co.uk page load time and found that the first response time was 469 ms and then it took 2.7 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 50% of websites can load faster.
perimetersecurity.co.uk performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value5.8 s
4/100
10%
Value10.4 s
0/100
25%
Value8.1 s
21/100
10%
Value170 ms
93/100
30%
Value0.16
73/100
15%
Value11.8 s
17/100
10%
469 ms
23 ms
310 ms
238 ms
160 ms
Our browser made a total of 89 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 88% of them (78 requests) were addressed to the original Perimetersecurity.co.uk, 4% (4 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 2% (2 requests) were made to Google-analytics.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.5 sec) belongs to the original domain Perimetersecurity.co.uk.
Page size can be reduced by 701.0 kB (36%)
1.9 MB
1.2 MB
In fact, the total size of Perimetersecurity.co.uk main page is 1.9 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 65% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 890.7 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 47.8 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 47.8 kB or 81% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 62.8 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Perimeter Security images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 423.4 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 423.4 kB or 54% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 167.0 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Perimetersecurity.co.uk needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 167.0 kB or 84% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 53 (64%)
83
30
The browser has sent 83 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Perimeter Security. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 38 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 17 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
perimetersecurity.co.uk
469 ms
40623.js
23 ms
style.css
310 ms
skeleton-responsive.css
238 ms
layout-responsive.css
160 ms
style-custom.css
162 ms
css
17 ms
styles.css
164 ms
jquery-ui.css
10 ms
form.min.css
239 ms
jquery-ui-1.9.2.custom.min.css
241 ms
layout.css
240 ms
jquery-ui.css
244 ms
jquery-ui-1.8.18.custom.css
342 ms
bigContact.css
343 ms
superfish.css
344 ms
prettyPhoto.css
345 ms
flexslider.css
347 ms
jquery.js
463 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
395 ms
cufon.js
475 ms
core.min.js
399 ms
datepicker.min.js
404 ms
underscore.min.js
408 ms
form.min.js
475 ms
jquery.ba-bbq.min.js
489 ms
jquery.scrolltab.js
490 ms
widget.min.js
491 ms
tabs.min.js
541 ms
accordion.min.js
555 ms
button.min.js
556 ms
jquery-unselectable.js
558 ms
mouse.min.js
566 ms
slider.min.js
570 ms
base.js
618 ms
custom.js
636 ms
jquery.fitvids.js
636 ms
easy-columns.css
569 ms
smae.js
517 ms
Museo_Sans_500.font.js
659 ms
api.js
25 ms
backbone.min.js
546 ms
wp-api.js
557 ms
superfish.js
555 ms
supersub.js
485 ms
hoverIntent.js
495 ms
gdl-scripts.js
539 ms
jquery.easing.js
556 ms
jquery.prettyPhoto.js
553 ms
jquery.jcarousellite.js
462 ms
jquery.flexslider.js
471 ms
comment-reply.min.js
511 ms
wp-embed.min.js
558 ms
wp-emoji-release.min.js
599 ms
pattern-1.png
598 ms
ga.js
33 ms
logo240w.gif
304 ms
facebook.png
304 ms
twitter.png
312 ms
google-plus.png
314 ms
kybold-st-1-1-980x250.jpg
393 ms
st-giles-980x250.jpg
399 ms
church-roof-1-980x250.jpg
417 ms
high-wycombe-1-980x250.jpg
340 ms
keeble-collage-1-980x250.jpg
445 ms
elliot-durham-1-980x250.jpg
393 ms
cornmarket-1-980x250.jpg
422 ms
blenheim-3-980x250.jpg
551 ms
blenheim-1-980x250.jpg
552 ms
960-250-vans-2-980x250.jpg
559 ms
banbury-rd-2-980x250.jpg
579 ms
banbury-rd-1-980x250.jpg
504 ms
construction-site-70x45.jpg
523 ms
gradient-top-gray-40px.png
577 ms
find-17px.png
1527 ms
gradient-vertical-6px.png
603 ms
tDbK2oqRg1oM3QBjjcaDkOr4nAfcGw.ttf
19 ms
tDbX2oqRg1oM3QBjjcaDkOr4lLz5CwOnTQ.ttf
18 ms
tDbI2oqRg1oM3QBjjcaDkOr9rAA.ttf
19 ms
tDbV2oqRg1oM3QBjjcaDkOJGiRD7OwQ.ttf
20 ms
left-cross-5px.png
601 ms
__utm.gif
13 ms
gradient-top-32px.png
579 ms
navigation-20px.png
589 ms
quotes-18px.png
596 ms
calendar.png
635 ms
recaptcha__en.js
35 ms
bg_control_nav_custom.png
412 ms
bg_direction_nav_custom.png
420 ms
perimetersecurity.co.uk accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Form elements do not have associated labels
Links do not have a discernible name
Best practices
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
Impact
Issue
[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.
perimetersecurity.co.uk best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Serves images with low resolution
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
perimetersecurity.co.uk SEO score
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Impact
Issue
Links are not crawlable
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Perimetersecurity.co.uk can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Perimetersecurity.co.uk main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
perimetersecurity.co.uk
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Perimeter Security. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: