3 sec in total
157 ms
2.6 sec
224 ms
Click here to check amazing Phantom Fillers content. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about phantomfillers.com
Free advice for a world-class expert in functional fillers, plus the latest developlments and where to purchase the best mineral solutions for your needs
Visit phantomfillers.comWe analyzed Phantomfillers.com page load time and found that the first response time was 157 ms and then it took 2.9 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 55% of websites can load faster.
phantomfillers.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value3.0 s
49/100
10%
Value10.7 s
0/100
25%
Value9.3 s
12/100
10%
Value140 ms
95/100
30%
Value1.064
2/100
15%
Value10.0 s
27/100
10%
157 ms
1755 ms
195 ms
383 ms
72 ms
Our browser made a total of 40 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 40% of them (16 requests) were addressed to the original Phantomfillers.com, 50% (20 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 10% (4 requests) were made to Phantomplastics.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.8 sec) belongs to the original domain Phantomfillers.com.
Page size can be reduced by 691.9 kB (65%)
1.1 MB
366.8 kB
In fact, the total size of Phantomfillers.com main page is 1.1 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 55% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 537.1 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 176.8 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 176.8 kB or 84% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 0 B
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Phantom Fillers images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 390.9 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 390.9 kB or 73% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 124.2 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Phantomfillers.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 124.2 kB or 86% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 10 (59%)
17
7
The browser has sent 17 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Phantom Fillers. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 7 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 5 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
phantomfillers.com
157 ms
phantomfillers.com
1755 ms
admin-bar.css
195 ms
PhantomPlasticsLogoNoShadowSmall.png
383 ms
mediaelementplayer-legacy.min.css
72 ms
wp-mediaelement.min.css
73 ms
jquery.min.js
208 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
150 ms
scripts.min.js
522 ms
common.js
208 ms
mediaelement-and-player.min.js
473 ms
mediaelement-migrate.min.js
219 ms
wp-mediaelement.min.js
216 ms
chris_deArmitt.jpeg
456 ms
Phantom-Customer-Logos-2018-Web-1200px.jpg
461 ms
DeArmitt-Book-Covers-2017-Horizontal.jpg
616 ms
et-divi-dynamic-2077-late.css
259 ms
preloader.gif
269 ms
memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsjZ0C4k.woff
44 ms
memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsjZ0C4n.ttf
49 ms
memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsiH0C4k.woff
50 ms
memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsiH0C4n.ttf
49 ms
memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsgH1y4k.woff
49 ms
memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsgH1y4n.ttf
49 ms
memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsg-1y4k.woff
60 ms
memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsg-1y4n.ttf
61 ms
memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgshZ1y4k.woff
61 ms
memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgshZ1y4n.ttf
57 ms
memQYaGs126MiZpBA-UFUIcVXSCEkx2cmqvXlWq8tWZ0Pw86hd0RkyFjaVQ.woff
69 ms
memQYaGs126MiZpBA-UFUIcVXSCEkx2cmqvXlWq8tWZ0Pw86hd0RkyFjaVc.ttf
60 ms
memQYaGs126MiZpBA-UFUIcVXSCEkx2cmqvXlWq8tWZ0Pw86hd0Rk0ZjaVQ.woff
79 ms
memQYaGs126MiZpBA-UFUIcVXSCEkx2cmqvXlWq8tWZ0Pw86hd0Rk0ZjaVc.ttf
83 ms
memQYaGs126MiZpBA-UFUIcVXSCEkx2cmqvXlWq8tWZ0Pw86hd0RkxhjaVQ.woff
84 ms
memQYaGs126MiZpBA-UFUIcVXSCEkx2cmqvXlWq8tWZ0Pw86hd0RkxhjaVc.ttf
82 ms
memQYaGs126MiZpBA-UFUIcVXSCEkx2cmqvXlWq8tWZ0Pw86hd0Rk8ZkaVQ.woff
83 ms
memQYaGs126MiZpBA-UFUIcVXSCEkx2cmqvXlWq8tWZ0Pw86hd0Rk8ZkaVc.ttf
83 ms
memQYaGs126MiZpBA-UFUIcVXSCEkx2cmqvXlWq8tWZ0Pw86hd0Rk5hkaVQ.woff
87 ms
memQYaGs126MiZpBA-UFUIcVXSCEkx2cmqvXlWq8tWZ0Pw86hd0Rk5hkaVc.ttf
92 ms
modules.woff
331 ms
style.min.css
130 ms
phantomfillers.com accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have a discernible name
Best practices
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
Impact
Issue
[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.
phantomfillers.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Issues were logged in the Issues panel in Chrome Devtools
phantomfillers.com SEO score
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Phantomfillers.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Phantomfillers.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
phantomfillers.com
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Phantom Fillers. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: