Report Summary

  • 93

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    92% of other websites

  • 100

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 97% of websites

  • 83

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    55% of websites

  • 91

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    70% of websites

pillowpicker.com

Pillow Picker | Find The Best Pillow For a Great Night's Sleep!

Page Load Speed

1.1 sec in total

First Response

151 ms

Resources Loaded

795 ms

Page Rendered

161 ms

pillowpicker.com screenshot

About Website

Visit pillowpicker.com now to see the best up-to-date Pillow Picker content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about pillowpicker.com

Pillow Picker is the #1 resource to help you find the best pillow for every position, condition, shape and size. Check out our detailed pillow reviews now!

Visit pillowpicker.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Pillowpicker.com page load time and found that the first response time was 151 ms and then it took 956 ms to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 20% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

pillowpicker.com performance score

93

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value1.6 s

94/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value3.0 s

78/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value2.0 s

99/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value0 ms

100/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value3.7 s

90/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

pillowpicker.com

151 ms

pillowpicker.com

268 ms

rocket-loader.min.js

6 ms

lazyload.min.js

46 ms

astra.woff

15 ms

Our browser made a total of 16 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 88% of them (14 requests) were addressed to the original Pillowpicker.com, 6% (1 request) were made to Use.typekit.net and 6% (1 request) were made to Images.dmca.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (316 ms) belongs to the original domain Pillowpicker.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 131.6 kB (29%)

Content Size

449.5 kB

After Optimization

317.9 kB

In fact, the total size of Pillowpicker.com main page is 449.5 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 25% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 289.7 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-82%

Potential reduce by 127.4 kB

  • Original 155.9 kB
  • After minification 153.6 kB
  • After compression 28.4 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 127.4 kB or 82% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-1%

Potential reduce by 4.1 kB

  • Original 289.7 kB
  • After minification 285.6 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Pillow Picker images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 0 B

  • Original 3.9 kB
  • After minification 3.9 kB
  • After compression 3.9 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

Requests Breakdown

We found no issues to fix!

Requests Now

11

After Optimization

11

The browser has sent 11 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Pillow Picker. According to our analytics all requests are already optimized.

Accessibility Review

pillowpicker.com accessibility score

100

Accessibility Issues

Best Practices

pillowpicker.com best practices score

83

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Serves images with low resolution

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

SEO Factors

pillowpicker.com SEO score

91

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Links are not crawlable

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Pillowpicker.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Pillowpicker.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Pillow Picker. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: