2.5 sec in total
221 ms
2.2 sec
90 ms
Visit pintue.cl now to see the best up-to-date Pintue content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about pintue.cl
Pintue.cl + Camping y Cabañas Laguna de Aculeo. + Guardería y Centro Náutico. + Muelles, Balsas y Levantes Marinas Pintue.
Visit pintue.clWe analyzed Pintue.cl page load time and found that the first response time was 221 ms and then it took 2.3 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 45% of websites can load faster.
pintue.cl performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value2.0 s
85/100
10%
Value7.1 s
5/100
25%
Value4.3 s
75/100
10%
Value710 ms
42/100
30%
Value0.016
100/100
15%
Value11.4 s
19/100
10%
221 ms
64 ms
59 ms
1276 ms
109 ms
Our browser made a total of 44 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 2% of them (1 request) were addressed to the original Pintue.cl, 39% (17 requests) were made to Static.parastorage.com and 27% (12 requests) were made to Sentry-next.wixpress.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.3 sec) relates to the external source Polyfill-fastly.io.
Page size can be reduced by 310.4 kB (46%)
667.6 kB
357.3 kB
In fact, the total size of Pintue.cl main page is 667.6 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 45% of websites need less resources to load. HTML takes 315.2 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 233.6 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 233.6 kB or 74% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 6.0 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Pintue needs image optimization as it can save up to 6.0 kB or 14% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.
Potential reduce by 70.7 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 70.7 kB or 23% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 13 (48%)
27
14
The browser has sent 27 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Pintue. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 14 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.
www.pintue.cl
221 ms
minified.js
64 ms
focus-within-polyfill.js
59 ms
polyfill.min.js
1276 ms
js
109 ms
thunderbolt-commons.01a1d4ab.bundle.min.js
98 ms
main.7ae9ac9b.bundle.min.js
99 ms
main.renderer.1d21f023.bundle.min.js
53 ms
lodash.min.js
97 ms
react.production.min.js
97 ms
react-dom.production.min.js
100 ms
siteTags.bundle.min.js
98 ms
wix-perf-measure.umd.min.js
99 ms
11062b_9ed582c71c5748c59760ba5f77a7a0fef000.jpg
89 ms
218f5e_6acfa134f6c81fdcc9ee6a61d5f7c997.jpg
257 ms
logo-confianza.jpg
267 ms
pintuelogo.png
433 ms
logopintuebn.png
365 ms
logo-mpuc.png
349 ms
logo-mp.png
372 ms
218f5e_78f35e237e5befc39648295d09e4e124.png
566 ms
103 ms
bundle.min.js
39 ms
u_mYNr_qYP37m7vgvmIYZxa1RVmPjeKy21_GQJaLlJI.woff
43 ms
FD_Udbezj8EHXbdsqLUplxa1RVmPjeKy21_GQJaLlJI.woff
41 ms
z9rX03Xuz9ZNHTMg1_ghGRa1RVmPjeKy21_GQJaLlJI.woff
41 ms
4udXuXg54JlPEP5iKO5AmRa1RVmPjeKy21_GQJaLlJI.woff
41 ms
132 ms
130 ms
120 ms
126 ms
123 ms
125 ms
156 ms
160 ms
157 ms
155 ms
156 ms
153 ms
37 ms
deprecation-es.v5.html
5 ms
bolt-performance
31 ms
deprecation-style.v5.css
10 ms
right-arrow.svg
11 ms
pintue.cl accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have a discernible name
pintue.cl best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Displays images with incorrect aspect ratio
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Page has valid source maps
pintue.cl SEO score
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
ES
ES
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Pintue.cl can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that Spanish is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Pintue.cl main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
pintue.cl
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Pintue. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: