4.4 sec in total
389 ms
3.8 sec
203 ms
Click here to check amazing Plastic Processing content. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about plasticprocessing.net
At Plastic Processing , we feature a high tech production facility that is flexible and quickly adaptable to meet your specific needs. Our manufacturing capabilities span a broad range of products and...
Visit plasticprocessing.netWe analyzed Plasticprocessing.net page load time and found that the first response time was 389 ms and then it took 4 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 65% of websites can load faster.
plasticprocessing.net performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value2.8 s
58/100
10%
Value4.8 s
31/100
25%
Value5.0 s
63/100
10%
Value220 ms
88/100
30%
Value0.011
100/100
15%
Value6.7 s
57/100
10%
389 ms
464 ms
553 ms
73 ms
77 ms
Our browser made a total of 18 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 22% of them (4 requests) were addressed to the original Plasticprocessing.net, 33% (6 requests) were made to Static-cdn.website-editor.net and 22% (4 requests) were made to Cdn.website-editor.net. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.5 sec) relates to the external source Cdn.website-editor.net.
Page size can be reduced by 38.7 kB (9%)
412.4 kB
373.7 kB
In fact, the total size of Plasticprocessing.net main page is 412.4 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 45% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 163.8 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 38.3 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 38.3 kB or 71% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 129 B
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Plastic Processing images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 4 B
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.
Potential reduce by 310 B
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Plasticprocessing.net has all CSS files already compressed.
Number of requests can be reduced by 5 (42%)
12
7
The browser has sent 12 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Plastic Processing. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 6 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
plasticprocessing.net
389 ms
plasticprocessing.net
464 ms
www.plasticprocessing.net
553 ms
css2
73 ms
d-css-runtime-desktop-one-package-structured-global.min.css
77 ms
dad04a9e2c32bedd461a40f80d02ce16.css
87 ms
97db7a367b7e48b6b0eb7b3ed2f5b829_withFlex_1.min.css
1457 ms
1and1-runtime.css
187 ms
97db7a367b7e48b6b0eb7b3ed2f5b829_home_withFlex_1.min.css
572 ms
blank-300x300-6b835778-bd24b0c9-280w.png
521 ms
1und1-logo8.svg
85 ms
jquery.min.js
70 ms
d-js-one-runtime-unified-desktop.min.js
83 ms
logo-offices-1-140w.png
511 ms
0e065ca3c9bb3e3b29ed9f02bfd1b68f12466b46087853f1c844f3af6d939e8b-1920w.jpeg
922 ms
fontawesome-webfont.woff
23 ms
dm-social-icons.ttf
22 ms
dm-common-icons.ttf
15 ms
plasticprocessing.net accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Links do not have a discernible name
plasticprocessing.net best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
plasticprocessing.net SEO score
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have descriptive text
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Plasticprocessing.net can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Plasticprocessing.net main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
plasticprocessing.net
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Plastic Processing. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: