2.8 sec in total
54 ms
615 ms
2.2 sec
Welcome to powermoves.blog homepage info - get ready to check Power Moves best content for United States right away, or after learning these important things about powermoves.blog
Over one hundred reviews and comparisons of popular devices including, smart home devices, robot vacuums, streaming devices, and speakers.
Visit powermoves.blogWe analyzed Powermoves.blog page load time and found that the first response time was 54 ms and then it took 2.8 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 55% of websites can load faster.
powermoves.blog performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value1.6 s
93/100
10%
Value6.5 s
8/100
25%
Value1.8 s
100/100
10%
Value820 ms
35/100
30%
Value0
100/100
15%
Value7.4 s
48/100
10%
54 ms
27 ms
62 ms
62 ms
31 ms
Our browser made a total of 41 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 83% of them (34 requests) were addressed to the original Powermoves.blog, 5% (2 requests) were made to Cdn.jsdelivr.net and 5% (2 requests) were made to Googletagmanager.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (466 ms) belongs to the original domain Powermoves.blog.
Page size can be reduced by 46.8 kB (2%)
2.3 MB
2.3 MB
In fact, the total size of Powermoves.blog main page is 2.3 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 70% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 2.3 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 44.5 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 44.5 kB or 82% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 2.1 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Power Moves images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 129 B
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.
Potential reduce by 61 B
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Powermoves.blog has all CSS files already compressed.
Number of requests can be reduced by 9 (23%)
40
31
The browser has sent 40 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Power Moves. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 10 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.
powermoves.blog
54 ms
screen.css
27 ms
portal.min.js
62 ms
sodo-search.min.js
62 ms
cards.min.js
31 ms
cards.min.css
39 ms
comment-counts.min.js
62 ms
member-attribution.min.js
62 ms
js
150 ms
jquery-3.5.1.min.js
67 ms
casper.js
57 ms
pmfinal.png
15 ms
idk2.png
128 ms
image.jpeg
96 ms
watch-worth-it.jpg
94 ms
levels-cgm-review.jpg
130 ms
is-eight-sleep-worth-it.jpg
127 ms
eight-sleep-review-2.jpg
155 ms
ultra-vs-series-9.jpg
158 ms
v12-vs-v15.jpg
166 ms
eufyvsroomba.jpg
246 ms
best-smart-button.jpg
305 ms
the-home.jpg
156 ms
encode-vs-level.jpg
158 ms
yale-vs-level-1.jpg
271 ms
eero-6--vs-pro-6e-1.jpg
250 ms
2023-apple-watch-bands.jpg
254 ms
apple-watch-series-8-vs-se-2.jpg
274 ms
is-peloton-worth-it.jpg
251 ms
2023.jpg
364 ms
google-wifi-vs-eero.jpg
411 ms
nest-vs-eero.jpg
407 ms
ecobee-vs-nest.jpg
389 ms
apple-vs-whoop-4.jpg
305 ms
oura-vs-whoop.jpg
420 ms
bike-vs-bikeplus.jpg
338 ms
whoop-4-review.jpg
466 ms
eight-sleep-review.jpg
386 ms
js
61 ms
analytics.js
22 ms
collect
48 ms
powermoves.blog accessibility score
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Buttons do not have an accessible name
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
powermoves.blog best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Page has valid source maps
powermoves.blog SEO score
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Powermoves.blog can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Powermoves.blog main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
powermoves.blog
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Power Moves. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: