Tools & Wizards About Us
preesoft.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 30

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    50% of other websites

  • 86

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 61% of websites

  • 83

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    55% of websites

  • 90

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    68% of websites

preesoft.com

Preesoft | Custom Software Development Solutions Provider

Page Load Speed

5 sec in total

First Response

465 ms

Resources Loaded

3.3 sec

Page Rendered

1.2 sec

preesoft.com screenshot

About Website

Visit preesoft.com now to see the best up-to-date Preesoft content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about preesoft.com

Preesoft truly believes in customer satisfaction. Share your burden with us, we will provide you quality services.

Visit preesoft.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Preesoft.com page load time and found that the first response time was 465 ms and then it took 4.5 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 70% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

preesoft.com performance score

30

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value4.9 s

11/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value10.5 s

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value7.0 s

32/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value710 ms

42/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.167

71/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value10.7 s

23/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

preesoft.com

465 ms

e53wo.css

144 ms

css

27 ms

e53wo.css

283 ms

a0i3x.css

219 ms

Our browser made a total of 76 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 54% of them (41 requests) were addressed to the original Preesoft.com, 36% (27 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 7% (5 requests) were made to Use.fontawesome.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (701 ms) belongs to the original domain Preesoft.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 291.8 kB (22%)

Content Size

1.3 MB

After Optimization

1.0 MB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Preesoft.com main page is 1.3 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 65% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 687.8 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-87%

Potential reduce by 281.0 kB

  • Original 321.9 kB
  • After minification 317.5 kB
  • After compression 40.9 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 281.0 kB or 87% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-1%

Potential reduce by 6.8 kB

  • Original 687.8 kB
  • After minification 681.0 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Preesoft images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-2%

Potential reduce by 3.0 kB

  • Original 174.2 kB
  • After minification 174.2 kB
  • After compression 171.3 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

CSS Optimization

-1%

Potential reduce by 1.1 kB

  • Original 143.8 kB
  • After minification 143.8 kB
  • After compression 142.8 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Preesoft.com has all CSS files already compressed.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 36 (84%)

Requests Now

43

After Optimization

7

  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 43 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Preesoft. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 24 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 14 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

preesoft.com

preesoft.com

465 ms

e53wo.css

e53wo.css

144 ms

css

css

27 ms

e53wo.css

e53wo.css

283 ms

a0i3x.css

a0i3x.css

219 ms

e53wo.css

e53wo.css

287 ms

post-27.css

post-27.css

220 ms

e53wo.css

e53wo.css

391 ms

post-7.css

post-7.css

250 ms

post-2185.css

post-2185.css

293 ms

all.css

all.css

160 ms

v4-shims.css

v4-shims.css

200 ms

css

css

23 ms

e53wo.css

e53wo.css

237 ms

e53wo.js

e53wo.js

413 ms

e53wo.js

e53wo.js

303 ms

particles.min.js

particles.min.js

26 ms

e53wo.css

e53wo.css

301 ms

frontend.min.js

frontend.min.js

302 ms

typed.js

typed.js

302 ms

typed.fe.js

typed.fe.js

371 ms

astra-addon-65e5b3c1b81a05-05744485.js

astra-addon-65e5b3c1b81a05-05744485.js

374 ms

smush-lazy-load-native.min.js

smush-lazy-load-native.min.js

378 ms

make-column-clickable.js

make-column-clickable.js

377 ms

imagesloaded.min.js

imagesloaded.min.js

401 ms

webpack-pro.runtime.min.js

webpack-pro.runtime.min.js

513 ms

webpack.runtime.min.js

webpack.runtime.min.js

513 ms

frontend-modules.min.js

frontend-modules.min.js

599 ms

wp-polyfill-inert.min.js

wp-polyfill-inert.min.js

514 ms

regenerator-runtime.min.js

regenerator-runtime.min.js

515 ms

wp-polyfill.min.js

wp-polyfill.min.js

601 ms

hooks.min.js

hooks.min.js

599 ms

i18n.min.js

i18n.min.js

599 ms

frontend.min.js

frontend.min.js

599 ms

waypoints.min.js

waypoints.min.js

600 ms

core.min.js

core.min.js

680 ms

frontend.min.js

frontend.min.js

683 ms

elements-handlers.min.js

elements-handlers.min.js

681 ms

plugin.min.js

plugin.min.js

683 ms

extendmauptechmapp.png

extendmauptechmapp.png

264 ms

mFTvWacfw6zH4dthXcyms1lPpC8I_b0juU0566fVKp5L0g.ttf

mFTvWacfw6zH4dthXcyms1lPpC8I_b0juU0566fVKp5L0g.ttf

195 ms

mFTiWacfw6zH4dthXcyms1lPpC8I_b0juU0xGITFB7xD-GNxkg.ttf

mFTiWacfw6zH4dthXcyms1lPpC8I_b0juU0xGITFB7xD-GNxkg.ttf

195 ms

mFTiWacfw6zH4dthXcyms1lPpC8I_b0juU0xQIXFB7xD-GNxkg.ttf

mFTiWacfw6zH4dthXcyms1lPpC8I_b0juU0xQIXFB7xD-GNxkg.ttf

279 ms

mFTiWacfw6zH4dthXcyms1lPpC8I_b0juU0xJIbFB7xD-GNxkg.ttf

mFTiWacfw6zH4dthXcyms1lPpC8I_b0juU0xJIbFB7xD-GNxkg.ttf

433 ms

mFThWacfw6zH4dthXcyms1lPpC8I_b0juU0xiJfSIJxp0Gl5.ttf

mFThWacfw6zH4dthXcyms1lPpC8I_b0juU0xiJfSIJxp0Gl5.ttf

433 ms

mFTiWacfw6zH4dthXcyms1lPpC8I_b0juU0xNIPFB7xD-GNxkg.ttf

mFTiWacfw6zH4dthXcyms1lPpC8I_b0juU0xNIPFB7xD-GNxkg.ttf

434 ms

mFTiWacfw6zH4dthXcyms1lPpC8I_b0juU0xUILFB7xD-GNxkg.ttf

mFTiWacfw6zH4dthXcyms1lPpC8I_b0juU0xUILFB7xD-GNxkg.ttf

312 ms

mFTiWacfw6zH4dthXcyms1lPpC8I_b0juU0xTIHFB7xD-GNxkg.ttf

mFTiWacfw6zH4dthXcyms1lPpC8I_b0juU0xTIHFB7xD-GNxkg.ttf

432 ms

mFTiWacfw6zH4dthXcyms1lPpC8I_b0juU0xaIDFB7xD-GNxkg.ttf

mFTiWacfw6zH4dthXcyms1lPpC8I_b0juU0xaIDFB7xD-GNxkg.ttf

361 ms

mFTkWacfw6zH4dthXcyms1lPpC8I_b0juU057p9pBYxE8mFTkGNc.ttf

mFTkWacfw6zH4dthXcyms1lPpC8I_b0juU057p9pBYxE8mFTkGNc.ttf

433 ms

mFTkWacfw6zH4dthXcyms1lPpC8I_b0juU057p91BoxE8mFTkGNc.ttf

mFTkWacfw6zH4dthXcyms1lPpC8I_b0juU057p91BoxE8mFTkGNc.ttf

434 ms

mFTkWacfw6zH4dthXcyms1lPpC8I_b0juU057p9RB4xE8mFTkGNc.ttf

mFTkWacfw6zH4dthXcyms1lPpC8I_b0juU057p9RB4xE8mFTkGNc.ttf

494 ms

mFTkWacfw6zH4dthXcyms1lPpC8I_b0juU057p8NBIxE8mFTkGNc.ttf

mFTkWacfw6zH4dthXcyms1lPpC8I_b0juU057p8NBIxE8mFTkGNc.ttf

496 ms

mFTkWacfw6zH4dthXcyms1lPpC8I_b0juU057p8hA4xE8mFTkGNc.ttf

mFTkWacfw6zH4dthXcyms1lPpC8I_b0juU057p8hA4xE8mFTkGNc.ttf

498 ms

mFThWacfw6zH4dthXcyms1lPpC8I_b0juU057pfSIJxp0Gl5.ttf

mFThWacfw6zH4dthXcyms1lPpC8I_b0juU057pfSIJxp0Gl5.ttf

497 ms

mFTkWacfw6zH4dthXcyms1lPpC8I_b0juU057p95AoxE8mFTkGNc.ttf

mFTkWacfw6zH4dthXcyms1lPpC8I_b0juU057p95AoxE8mFTkGNc.ttf

496 ms

mFTkWacfw6zH4dthXcyms1lPpC8I_b0juU057p8dAYxE8mFTkGNc.ttf

mFTkWacfw6zH4dthXcyms1lPpC8I_b0juU057p8dAYxE8mFTkGNc.ttf

497 ms

mFTjWacfw6zH4dthXcyms1lPpC8I_b0juU057p-xEJtj0kt7mms.ttf

mFTjWacfw6zH4dthXcyms1lPpC8I_b0juU057p-xEJtj0kt7mms.ttf

554 ms

Group-1.png

Group-1.png

113 ms

preesoft-logo-new-160x61.png

preesoft-logo-new-160x61.png

268 ms

smush-lazyloader-1.gif

smush-lazyloader-1.gif

417 ms

fa-solid-900.woff

fa-solid-900.woff

443 ms

fa-solid-900.woff

fa-solid-900.woff

205 ms

fa-regular-400.woff

fa-regular-400.woff

206 ms

pxiEyp8kv8JHgFVrJJfed3FHGPc.ttf

pxiEyp8kv8JHgFVrJJfed3FHGPc.ttf

272 ms

pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLGT9Z1xlEN2JQEk.ttf

pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLGT9Z1xlEN2JQEk.ttf

272 ms

pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLDz8Z1xlEN2JQEk.ttf

pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLDz8Z1xlEN2JQEk.ttf

273 ms

pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLFj_Z1xlEN2JQEk.ttf

pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLFj_Z1xlEN2JQEk.ttf

274 ms

pxiGyp8kv8JHgFVrLPTucHtFOvWDSA.ttf

pxiGyp8kv8JHgFVrLPTucHtFOvWDSA.ttf

273 ms

pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLEj6Z1xlEN2JQEk.ttf

pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLEj6Z1xlEN2JQEk.ttf

327 ms

pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLCz7Z1xlEN2JQEk.ttf

pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLCz7Z1xlEN2JQEk.ttf

325 ms

pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLDD4Z1xlEN2JQEk.ttf

pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLDD4Z1xlEN2JQEk.ttf

326 ms

pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLBT5Z1xlEN2JQEk.ttf

pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLBT5Z1xlEN2JQEk.ttf

325 ms

fa-brands-400.woff

fa-brands-400.woff

404 ms

fa-brands-400.woff

fa-brands-400.woff

324 ms

Main-banner-1024x738.png

Main-banner-1024x738.png

701 ms

Accessibility Review

preesoft.com accessibility score

86

Accessibility Issues

ARIA

These are opportunities to improve the usage of ARIA in your application which may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

[aria-*] attributes do not match their roles

High

[aria-hidden="true"] elements contain focusable descendents

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Best Practices

preesoft.com best practices score

83

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

High

Page has valid source maps

SEO Factors

preesoft.com SEO score

90

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Links are not crawlable

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Preesoft.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Preesoft.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

preesoft.com

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Preesoft. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: