Tools & Wizards About Us
preferredconcretepolishing.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 78

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    85% of other websites

  • 50

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 21% of websites

  • 75

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    35% of websites

  • 84

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    52% of websites

preferredconcretepolishing.com

Concrete Polishing Services | Concrete Finishing & ResurfacingPreferred Concrete Polishing

Page Load Speed

4.2 sec in total

First Response

152 ms

Resources Loaded

3.9 sec

Page Rendered

175 ms

preferredconcretepolishing.com screenshot

About Website

Visit preferredconcretepolishing.com now to see the best up-to-date Preferred Concrete Polishing content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about preferredconcretepolishing.com

Located in Kernersville NC, we provide concrete polishing and concrete floor finishing for both commercial and residential through out the United States.

Visit preferredconcretepolishing.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Preferredconcretepolishing.com page load time and found that the first response time was 152 ms and then it took 4.1 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 65% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

preferredconcretepolishing.com performance score

78

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value1.9 s

87/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value3.5 s

65/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value6.6 s

37/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value260 ms

83/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.001

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value3.0 s

96/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

preferredconcretepolishing.com

152 ms

preferredconcretepolishing.com

2847 ms

style.css

64 ms

layout.css

237 ms

style.min.css

237 ms

Our browser made a total of 47 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that all of those requests were addressed to Preferredconcretepolishing.com and no external sources were called. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (2.8 sec) belongs to the original domain Preferredconcretepolishing.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 43.6 kB (14%)

Content Size

319.3 kB

After Optimization

275.7 kB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Preferredconcretepolishing.com main page is 319.3 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 30% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 197.1 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-76%

Potential reduce by 25.6 kB

  • Original 33.5 kB
  • After minification 31.9 kB
  • After compression 7.9 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 25.6 kB or 76% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-5%

Potential reduce by 10.6 kB

  • Original 197.1 kB
  • After minification 186.5 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Preferred Concrete Polishing images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-2%

Potential reduce by 919 B

  • Original 54.7 kB
  • After minification 54.7 kB
  • After compression 53.8 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

CSS Optimization

-19%

Potential reduce by 6.5 kB

  • Original 34.0 kB
  • After minification 33.7 kB
  • After compression 27.4 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Preferredconcretepolishing.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 6.5 kB or 19% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 15 (48%)

Requests Now

31

After Optimization

16

  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 31 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Preferred Concrete Polishing. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 10 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 7 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

preferredconcretepolishing.com

preferredconcretepolishing.com

152 ms

preferredconcretepolishing.com

preferredconcretepolishing.com

2847 ms

style.css

style.css

64 ms

layout.css

layout.css

237 ms

style.min.css

style.min.css

237 ms

styles.css

styles.css

237 ms

jquery.min.js

jquery.min.js

292 ms

jquery-migrate.min.js

jquery-migrate.min.js

240 ms

third-party.js

third-party.js

123 ms

jquery.flexslider.min.js

jquery.flexslider.min.js

184 ms

feedback.js

feedback.js

248 ms

general.js

general.js

298 ms

shortcodes.css

shortcodes.css

298 ms

custom.css

custom.css

298 ms

generator.php

generator.php

569 ms

comment-reply.min.js

comment-reply.min.js

310 ms

index.js

index.js

352 ms

index.js

index.js

358 ms

style.css

style.css

300 ms

wp-emoji-release.min.js

wp-emoji-release.min.js

64 ms

facebook.jpg

facebook.jpg

124 ms

twitter.jpg

twitter.jpg

119 ms

linkedin.jpg

linkedin.jpg

123 ms

rss.jpg

rss.jpg

123 ms

motorcycle-showroom-polished-floor.jpg

motorcycle-showroom-polished-floor.jpg

123 ms

piano-room-polished-floor.jpg

piano-room-polished-floor.jpg

124 ms

polished-new-logo-white-1.png

polished-new-logo-white-1.png

3 ms

motorcycle-showroom-floor.jpg

motorcycle-showroom-floor.jpg

179 ms

woothemes.png

woothemes.png

3 ms

twitter.jpg

twitter.jpg

7 ms

linkedin.jpg

linkedin.jpg

5 ms

facebook.jpg

facebook.jpg

6 ms

rss.jpg

rss.jpg

6 ms

motorcycle-showroom-polished-floor.jpg

motorcycle-showroom-polished-floor.jpg

5 ms

piano-room-polished-floor.jpg

piano-room-polished-floor.jpg

5 ms

body-bg.jpg

body-bg.jpg

128 ms

banner-bg.png

banner-bg.png

123 ms

nav-up.jpg

nav-up.jpg

125 ms

header-bottom.jpg

header-bottom.jpg

124 ms

heading-stripe.jpg

heading-stripe.jpg

125 ms

motorcycle-showroom-floor.jpg

motorcycle-showroom-floor.jpg

2 ms

banner-bg.png

banner-bg.png

116 ms

nav-up.jpg

nav-up.jpg

63 ms

header-bottom.jpg

header-bottom.jpg

69 ms

heading-stripe.jpg

heading-stripe.jpg

61 ms

body-bg.jpg

body-bg.jpg

119 ms

websymbols-regular-webfont.woff

websymbols-regular-webfont.woff

63 ms

Accessibility Review

preferredconcretepolishing.com accessibility score

50

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Best practices

These items highlight common accessibility best practices.

Impact

Issue

High

[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.

Best Practices

preferredconcretepolishing.com best practices score

75

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Serves images with low resolution

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

SEO Factors

preferredconcretepolishing.com SEO score

84

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Links are not crawlable

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Preferredconcretepolishing.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Preferredconcretepolishing.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

preferredconcretepolishing.com

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Preferred Concrete Polishing. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: