Tools & Wizards About Us
probar.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 47

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    65% of other websites

  • 72

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 37% of websites

  • 0

    Best Practices

  • 86

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    60% of websites

probar.com

ProBar Inventory Managment | Commercial, Government & K-12 Inventory

Page Load Speed

3.2 sec in total

First Response

491 ms

Resources Loaded

2.1 sec

Page Rendered

533 ms

probar.com screenshot

About Website

Visit probar.com now to see the best up-to-date Pro Bar content for United States and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about probar.com

ProBar provides management for Commercial, Government & K-12 inventory, from physical inventory and consulting services to warehouse services and valuation.

Visit probar.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Probar.com page load time and found that the first response time was 491 ms and then it took 2.7 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 50% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

probar.com performance score

47

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value4.8 s

11/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value6.7 s

7/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value5.5 s

55/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value230 ms

86/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.175

69/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value9.7 s

28/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

probar.com

491 ms

wp-emoji-release.min.js

58 ms

styles.css

112 ms

style.css

158 ms

js_composer.min.css

285 ms

Our browser made a total of 51 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 80% of them (41 requests) were addressed to the original Probar.com, 12% (6 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 4% (2 requests) were made to Fonts.googleapis.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (816 ms) belongs to the original domain Probar.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 223.6 kB (7%)

Content Size

3.1 MB

After Optimization

2.9 MB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Probar.com main page is 3.1 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 65% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 2.3 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-71%

Potential reduce by 55.8 kB

  • Original 78.8 kB
  • After minification 77.7 kB
  • After compression 22.9 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 55.8 kB or 71% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-7%

Potential reduce by 153.8 kB

  • Original 2.3 MB
  • After minification 2.1 MB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Pro Bar images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-1%

Potential reduce by 2.9 kB

  • Original 452.5 kB
  • After minification 452.5 kB
  • After compression 449.6 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

CSS Optimization

-4%

Potential reduce by 11.1 kB

  • Original 253.7 kB
  • After minification 252.8 kB
  • After compression 242.5 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Probar.com has all CSS files already compressed.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 33 (79%)

Requests Now

42

After Optimization

9

  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 42 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Pro Bar. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 20 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 15 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

probar.com

probar.com

491 ms

wp-emoji-release.min.js

wp-emoji-release.min.js

58 ms

styles.css

styles.css

112 ms

style.css

style.css

158 ms

js_composer.min.css

js_composer.min.css

285 ms

css

css

37 ms

main.min.css

main.min.css

270 ms

font-awesome.min.css

font-awesome.min.css

161 ms

fontello.min.css

fontello.min.css

160 ms

style.css

style.css

162 ms

jquery-ui.min.css

jquery-ui.min.css

218 ms

custom-ef47e89274.css

custom-ef47e89274.css

326 ms

media-072ce30ec5.css

media-072ce30ec5.css

219 ms

Defaults.css

Defaults.css

223 ms

css

css

51 ms

ultimate.min.css

ultimate.min.css

383 ms

jquery.js

jquery.js

338 ms

jquery-migrate.min.js

jquery-migrate.min.js

306 ms

above-the-fold.min.js

above-the-fold.min.js

322 ms

core.min.js

core.min.js

337 ms

ultimate.min.js

ultimate.min.js

466 ms

api.js

api.js

36 ms

font-awesome.min.css

font-awesome.min.css

380 ms

main.min.js

main.min.js

507 ms

scripts.js

scripts.js

380 ms

datepicker.min.js

datepicker.min.js

464 ms

widget.min.js

widget.min.js

505 ms

button.min.js

button.min.js

507 ms

spinner.min.js

spinner.min.js

505 ms

wp-embed.min.js

wp-embed.min.js

507 ms

js_composer_front.min.js

js_composer_front.min.js

505 ms

waypoints.min.js

waypoints.min.js

816 ms

jquery.validationEngine.js

jquery.validationEngine.js

816 ms

jquery.validationEngine-en.js

jquery.validationEngine-en.js

816 ms

dt-contact-form.js

dt-contact-form.js

815 ms

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsjZ0B4gaVc.ttf

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsjZ0B4gaVc.ttf

355 ms

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsgH1x4gaVc.ttf

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsgH1x4gaVc.ttf

566 ms

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsg-1x4gaVc.ttf

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsg-1x4gaVc.ttf

596 ms

recaptcha__en.js

recaptcha__en.js

587 ms

PB_UpdateLogo.png

PB_UpdateLogo.png

547 ms

PB_UpdateLogo_200.png

PB_UpdateLogo_200.png

547 ms

dreamstime_s_11785459-531x531.jpg

dreamstime_s_11785459-531x531.jpg

546 ms

books-404x404.jpg

books-404x404.jpg

545 ms

lW-swjwOK3Ps5GSJlNNkMalNpiZe_ldbOR4W776rR349Lw.ttf

lW-swjwOK3Ps5GSJlNNkMalNpiZe_ldbOR4W776rR349Lw.ttf

244 ms

lW-swjwOK3Ps5GSJlNNkMalNpiZe_ldbOR4W74erR349Lw.ttf

lW-swjwOK3Ps5GSJlNNkMalNpiZe_ldbOR4W74erR349Lw.ttf

243 ms

lW-swjwOK3Ps5GSJlNNkMalNpiZe_ldbOR4W71msR349Lw.ttf

lW-swjwOK3Ps5GSJlNNkMalNpiZe_ldbOR4W71msR349Lw.ttf

244 ms

fontawesome-webfont.woff

fontawesome-webfont.woff

315 ms

fontawesome-webfont.woff

fontawesome-webfont.woff

325 ms

hero2.jpg

hero2.jpg

162 ms

blueconcrete.jpg

blueconcrete.jpg

310 ms

barcodescanner.jpg

barcodescanner.jpg

261 ms

Accessibility Review

probar.com accessibility score

72

Accessibility Issues

ARIA

These are opportunities to improve the usage of ARIA in your application which may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Elements with an ARIA [role] that require children to contain a specific [role] are missing some or all of those required children.

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Tables and lists

These are opportunities to improve the experience of reading tabular or list data using assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

List items (<li>) are not contained within <ul> or <ol> parent elements.

Best practices

These items highlight common accessibility best practices.

Impact

Issue

High

[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.

SEO Factors

probar.com SEO score

86

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Page is blocked from indexing

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Probar.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Probar.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

probar.com

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Pro Bar. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: