5 sec in total
477 ms
3.9 sec
652 ms
Visit profepil.ru now to see the best up-to-date Profepil content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about profepil.ru
Врачебная и эстетическая косметология- наш сильный козырь. Наши специалисты готовы всегда оказать самые передовые и действенные процедуры по коррекции любых эстетических проблем.
Visit profepil.ruWe analyzed Profepil.ru page load time and found that the first response time was 477 ms and then it took 4.5 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 70% of websites can load faster.
profepil.ru performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value2.9 s
53/100
10%
Value2.9 s
81/100
25%
Value9.0 s
14/100
10%
Value1,620 ms
12/100
30%
Value0.195
64/100
15%
Value11.7 s
18/100
10%
477 ms
887 ms
125 ms
246 ms
26 ms
Our browser made a total of 72 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 1% of them (1 request) were addressed to the original Profepil.ru, 83% (60 requests) were made to Epiklinik.ru and 4% (3 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1 sec) relates to the external source Epiklinik.ru.
Page size can be reduced by 860.4 kB (52%)
1.7 MB
794.2 kB
In fact, the total size of Profepil.ru main page is 1.7 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 60% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 603.6 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 38.5 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 38.5 kB or 79% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 24.5 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Profepil images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 412.4 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 412.4 kB or 68% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 385.0 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Profepil.ru needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 385.0 kB or 84% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 46 (69%)
67
21
The browser has sent 67 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Profepil. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 28 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 15 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
profepil.ru
477 ms
epiklinik.ru
887 ms
wp-emoji-release.min.js
125 ms
q-a-plus.css
246 ms
css
26 ms
css
38 ms
reset.css
251 ms
superfish.css
248 ms
jquery.fancybox.css
248 ms
jquery.qtip.css
283 ms
jquery-ui-1.9.2.custom.css
284 ms
style.css
368 ms
responsive.css
375 ms
custom.css
374 ms
tablepress-combined.min.css
378 ms
jquery.js
564 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
423 ms
js
28 ms
fsml-base.css
489 ms
js_composer_front.css
488 ms
q-a-plus.js
489 ms
core.min.js
489 ms
widget.min.js
669 ms
accordion.min.js
670 ms
tabs.min.js
673 ms
datepicker.min.js
675 ms
jquery.ba-bbq.min.js
679 ms
jquery.history.js
700 ms
jquery.easing.1.3.js
710 ms
jquery.carouFredSel-5.6.4-packed.js
746 ms
jquery.sliderControl.js
753 ms
jquery.timeago.js
754 ms
jquery.hint.js
755 ms
jquery.isotope.min.js
929 ms
jquery.isotope.masonry.js
960 ms
jquery.fancybox-1.3.4.pack.js
961 ms
jquery.qtip.min.js
989 ms
jquery.blockUI.js
990 ms
main.js
990 ms
js_composer_front.js
1003 ms
fsml-hideshow.js
1005 ms
bg_xv.jpg
386 ms
top_hint_bg_red.png
384 ms
logo_epiclinik2.png
546 ms
slide9.jpg
974 ms
slide_cosmetologia.jpg
785 ms
slide_body_proc.jpg
827 ms
icon_arrow_margin_right_white.png
545 ms
icon_arrow_left_black.png
545 ms
icon_arrow_right_black.png
665 ms
slide_epileatsia-1024x469-kopiya-225x150.jpg
682 ms
b69b78a470d3ff45226d3444dc829072-kopiya-225x150.jpg
663 ms
114-225x150.jpg
907 ms
20120520212813_14051-225x150.jpg
787 ms
B05AE6293D5F564288307A6Cr-225x150.jpg
823 ms
laser-225x150.jpg
905 ms
icon_arrow_right_white.png
909 ms
icon_arrow_left_white.png
927 ms
icon_arrow_top_white.png
921 ms
facebook.png
983 ms
youtube.png
979 ms
twitter.png
981 ms
sZNgXJcCxH0
103 ms
pkYDSlCHbDnBWPT5PPFFTA.ttf
34 ms
social_vk.png
1048 ms
social_od.png
1027 ms
www-embed-player-vfl8xM8me.css
37 ms
www-embed-player.js
73 ms
Lrq7Jibxdtv2QOPyDSqncpDfQFNs3PE6SoUrUNh2GTU.js
248 ms
ad_status.js
262 ms
zN7GBFwfMP4uA6AR0HCoLQ.ttf
180 ms
RxZJdnzeo3R5zSexge8UUaCWcynf_cDxXwCLxiixG1c.ttf
189 ms
profepil.ru accessibility score
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Buttons do not have an accessible name
Links do not have a discernible name
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
[id] attributes on active, focusable elements are not unique
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
profepil.ru best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Issues were logged in the Issues panel in Chrome Devtools
profepil.ru SEO score
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
RU
RU
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Profepil.ru can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that Russian is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Profepil.ru main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
profepil.ru
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Profepil. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: