Tools & Wizards About Us
protectthevote.net screenshot

Report Summary

  • 33

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    53% of other websites

  • 76

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 42% of websites

  • 83

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    55% of websites

  • 93

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    83% of websites

protectthevote.net

Home 2024 - Election Protection

Page Load Speed

1.3 sec in total

First Response

56 ms

Resources Loaded

619 ms

Page Rendered

590 ms

protectthevote.net screenshot

About Website

Welcome to protectthevote.net homepage info - get ready to check Protectthevote best content right away, or after learning these important things about protectthevote.net

If you agree that every eligible voter deserves to have their voice count, you can take action from home or in person by serving as a nonpartisan Election Protection volunteer.

Visit protectthevote.net

Key Findings

We analyzed Protectthevote.net page load time and found that the first response time was 56 ms and then it took 1.2 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 25% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

protectthevote.net performance score

33

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value4.8 s

12/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value8.1 s

2/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value6.7 s

36/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value730 ms

40/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.081

94/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value11.8 s

17/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

protectthevote.net

56 ms

protectthevote.net

114 ms

js

88 ms

style.css

37 ms

animate.css

32 ms

Our browser made a total of 48 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 52% of them (25 requests) were addressed to the original Protectthevote.net, 17% (8 requests) were made to Cdnjs.cloudflare.com and 8% (4 requests) were made to App.protectthevote.net. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (187 ms) belongs to the original domain Protectthevote.net.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 455.8 kB (28%)

Content Size

1.7 MB

After Optimization

1.2 MB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Protectthevote.net main page is 1.7 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 65% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 1.3 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-78%

Potential reduce by 60.7 kB

  • Original 77.6 kB
  • After minification 76.7 kB
  • After compression 17.0 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 60.7 kB or 78% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-29%

Potential reduce by 381.7 kB

  • Original 1.3 MB
  • After minification 919.5 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Protectthevote needs image optimization as it can save up to 381.7 kB or 29% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.

JavaScript Optimization

-3%

Potential reduce by 4.8 kB

  • Original 141.3 kB
  • After minification 141.3 kB
  • After compression 136.6 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

CSS Optimization

-6%

Potential reduce by 8.7 kB

  • Original 135.1 kB
  • After minification 135.1 kB
  • After compression 126.4 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Protectthevote.net has all CSS files already compressed.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 32 (80%)

Requests Now

40

After Optimization

8

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 40 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Protectthevote. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 22 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 12 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

protectthevote.net

protectthevote.net

56 ms

protectthevote.net

protectthevote.net

114 ms

js

js

88 ms

style.css

style.css

37 ms

animate.css

animate.css

32 ms

css

css

53 ms

all.min.css

all.min.css

47 ms

wow.min.js

wow.min.js

62 ms

featherlight.css

featherlight.css

124 ms

formidableforms.css

formidableforms.css

128 ms

style.min.css

style.min.css

46 ms

wpautoterms.css

wpautoterms.css

187 ms

pagenavi-css.css

pagenavi-css.css

44 ms

jquery.min.js

jquery.min.js

54 ms

jquery-migrate.min.js

jquery-migrate.min.js

58 ms

wp-polyfill-inert.min.js

wp-polyfill-inert.min.js

65 ms

regenerator-runtime.min.js

regenerator-runtime.min.js

64 ms

wp-polyfill.min.js

wp-polyfill.min.js

69 ms

dom-ready.min.js

dom-ready.min.js

71 ms

base.js

base.js

76 ms

smooth-scroll.min.js

smooth-scroll.min.js

62 ms

widgets.js

widgets.js

42 ms

tippy.all.min.js

tippy.all.min.js

52 ms

jquery.mmenu.all.js

jquery.mmenu.all.js

62 ms

jquery.mmenu.all.css

jquery.mmenu.all.css

68 ms

jquery.mhead.js

jquery.mhead.js

79 ms

jquery-1.12.4.min.js

jquery-1.12.4.min.js

39 ms

email-decode.min.js

email-decode.min.js

72 ms

hero.css

hero.css

82 ms

featherlight.js

featherlight.js

102 ms

js

js

49 ms

analytics.js

analytics.js

15 ms

collect

collect

12 ms

sdk.js

sdk.js

102 ms

join

join

56 ms

logo-edit-2.jpg

logo-edit-2.jpg

104 ms

154734646_m-1024x683.jpg

154734646_m-1024x683.jpg

79 ms

ephome-950x1024.jpg

ephome-950x1024.jpg

165 ms

join

join

93 ms

fa-solid-900.ttf

fa-solid-900.ttf

40 ms

fa-regular-400.ttf

fa-regular-400.ttf

36 ms

HalyardText-Bd.woff

HalyardText-Bd.woff

103 ms

HalyardDis-Bd.woff

HalyardDis-Bd.woff

90 ms

fa-brands-400.ttf

fa-brands-400.ttf

35 ms

sdk.js

sdk.js

4 ms

60 ms

app-5c6eedf6e28bc27c86e1da6d679f060f.css

app-5c6eedf6e28bc27c86e1da6d679f060f.css

10 ms

app-d77bac995938b6993321fc47e6a1e400.js

app-d77bac995938b6993321fc47e6a1e400.js

30 ms

Accessibility Review

protectthevote.net accessibility score

76

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

<frame> or <iframe> elements do not have a title

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Internationalization and localization

These are opportunities to improve the interpretation of your content by users in different locales.

Impact

Issue

High

<html> element does not have a [lang] attribute

Best Practices

protectthevote.net best practices score

83

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

SEO Factors

protectthevote.net SEO score

93

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Links are not crawlable

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    N/A

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Protectthevote.net can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and neither this language nor any other was claimed in <html> or <meta> tags. Our system also found out that Protectthevote.net main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

protectthevote.net

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Protectthevote. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: