Tools & Wizards About Us
pureprocesstechnology.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 10

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    23% of other websites

  • 89

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 71% of websites

  • 67

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    24% of websites

  • 90

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    68% of websites

pureprocesstechnology.com

Home - Pure Process Technology

Page Load Speed

1.1 sec in total

First Response

212 ms

Resources Loaded

641 ms

Page Rendered

207 ms

pureprocesstechnology.com screenshot

About Website

Click here to check amazing Pure Process Technology content for India. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about pureprocesstechnology.com

Full service manufacturer and industry leader of high-quality purification systems engineered to meet your budget and space requirements.

Visit pureprocesstechnology.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Pureprocesstechnology.com page load time and found that the first response time was 212 ms and then it took 848 ms to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 15% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

pureprocesstechnology.com performance score

10

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value4.5 s

15/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value16.9 s

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value10.0 s

9/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value1,180 ms

21/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.948

3/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value17.5 s

4/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

pureprocesstechnology.com

212 ms

www.pureprocesstechnology.com

85 ms

styles.css

16 ms

font-awesome.min.css

36 ms

slick.css

38 ms

Our browser made a total of 71 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 90% of them (64 requests) were addressed to the original Pureprocesstechnology.com, 3% (2 requests) were made to Maxcdn.bootstrapcdn.com and 3% (2 requests) were made to Google.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (231 ms) relates to the external source Google.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 518.4 kB (22%)

Content Size

2.3 MB

After Optimization

1.8 MB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Pureprocesstechnology.com main page is 2.3 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 75% of websites need less resources to load and that’s why Accessify’s recommendations for optimization and resource minification can be helpful for this project. Images take 1.4 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-79%

Potential reduce by 66.5 kB

  • Original 84.0 kB
  • After minification 77.7 kB
  • After compression 17.6 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 66.5 kB or 79% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-12%

Potential reduce by 162.3 kB

  • Original 1.4 MB
  • After minification 1.2 MB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Pure Process Technology needs image optimization as it can save up to 162.3 kB or 12% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.

JavaScript Optimization

-39%

Potential reduce by 234.6 kB

  • Original 601.6 kB
  • After minification 596.4 kB
  • After compression 367.1 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 234.6 kB or 39% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-21%

Potential reduce by 55.0 kB

  • Original 265.2 kB
  • After minification 264.6 kB
  • After compression 210.2 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Pureprocesstechnology.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 55.0 kB or 21% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 47 (73%)

Requests Now

64

After Optimization

17

  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 64 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Pure Process Technology. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 25 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 24 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

pureprocesstechnology.com

pureprocesstechnology.com

212 ms

www.pureprocesstechnology.com

www.pureprocesstechnology.com

85 ms

styles.css

styles.css

16 ms

font-awesome.min.css

font-awesome.min.css

36 ms

slick.css

slick.css

38 ms

wtwp-public.css

wtwp-public.css

34 ms

wpt-style.css

wpt-style.css

38 ms

061311bbe3104f42ad098af969e3f129.css

061311bbe3104f42ad098af969e3f129.css

39 ms

block-frontend.css

block-frontend.css

32 ms

bootstrap.css

bootstrap.css

87 ms

style.css

style.css

94 ms

fontawesome-all.css

fontawesome-all.css

96 ms

block-style.css

block-style.css

95 ms

js_composer.min.css

js_composer.min.css

97 ms

video-js.min.css

video-js.min.css

93 ms

kg-video-js-skin.css

kg-video-js-skin.css

122 ms

videopack-styles.css

videopack-styles.css

123 ms

style.css

style.css

119 ms

jquery.min.js

jquery.min.js

122 ms

jquery-migrate.min.js

jquery-migrate.min.js

121 ms

jquery.cycle.all.lat.js

jquery.cycle.all.lat.js

121 ms

contact-form-7.js

contact-form-7.js

125 ms

bootstrap.js

bootstrap.js

125 ms

custom.js

custom.js

125 ms

bootstrap.css

bootstrap.css

125 ms

custom-style.css

custom-style.css

121 ms

owl.carousel.min.css

owl.carousel.min.css

124 ms

owl.theme.default.min.css

owl.theme.default.min.css

125 ms

font-awesome.min.css

font-awesome.min.css

110 ms

jquery-3.2.1.min.js

jquery-3.2.1.min.js

130 ms

bootstrap.min.js

bootstrap.min.js

129 ms

owl.carousel.min.js

owl.carousel.min.js

128 ms

custom.js

custom.js

125 ms

animate.min.css

animate.min.css

128 ms

hooks.min.js

hooks.min.js

124 ms

i18n.min.js

i18n.min.js

128 ms

index.js

index.js

128 ms

index.js

index.js

129 ms

api.js

api.js

135 ms

api.js

api.js

231 ms

99825.js

99825.js

132 ms

3176.css

3176.css

128 ms

jquery.superfish.js

jquery.superfish.js

126 ms

wp-polyfill.min.js

wp-polyfill.min.js

107 ms

index.js

index.js

107 ms

js_composer_front.min.js

js_composer_front.min.js

101 ms

video.min.js

video.min.js

199 ms

videopack.js

videopack.js

105 ms

akismet-frontend.js

akismet-frontend.js

73 ms

vc-waypoints.min.js

vc-waypoints.min.js

142 ms

style.css

style.css

51 ms

gtm.js

gtm.js

174 ms

banner-testimonail.jpg

banner-testimonail.jpg

74 ms

PPTWebsiteCollage.png

PPTWebsiteCollage.png

64 ms

PPTWebsiteCollage-2.png

PPTWebsiteCollage-2.png

66 ms

cropped-2Color_PPT_LogoNObckgrnd_ALLWhiteLettering.png

cropped-2Color_PPT_LogoNObckgrnd_ALLWhiteLettering.png

59 ms

20_yearsicon-e1635368561714.png

20_yearsicon-e1635368561714.png

59 ms

qualiity-icon-e1635368037101.png

qualiity-icon-e1635368037101.png

59 ms

cost-effective-icon-e1635368512195.png

cost-effective-icon-e1635368512195.png

57 ms

Experience-Knowledge-icon-e1635368174455.png

Experience-Knowledge-icon-e1635368174455.png

60 ms

Performance-icon-e1635368462640.png

Performance-icon-e1635368462640.png

61 ms

service-icon1-e1635368403581.png

service-icon1-e1635368403581.png

61 ms

quote.png

quote.png

60 ms

openquote1.gif

openquote1.gif

61 ms

closequote1.gif

closequote1.gif

61 ms

ROandYourWaterDIstributionPlan_WordPressImagew-150x150.jpg

ROandYourWaterDIstributionPlan_WordPressImagew-150x150.jpg

64 ms

ImageForPost-150x150.jpg

ImageForPost-150x150.jpg

64 ms

WDH-heading-150x113.png

WDH-heading-150x113.png

66 ms

Helvetica.ttf

Helvetica.ttf

66 ms

fontawesome-webfont.woff

fontawesome-webfont.woff

24 ms

fontawesome-webfont.woff

fontawesome-webfont.woff

16 ms

Accessibility Review

pureprocesstechnology.com accessibility score

89

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Best Practices

pureprocesstechnology.com best practices score

67

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Displays images with incorrect aspect ratio

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

High

Missing source maps for large first-party JavaScript

SEO Factors

pureprocesstechnology.com SEO score

90

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Pureprocesstechnology.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Pureprocesstechnology.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

pureprocesstechnology.com

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Pure Process Technology. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: