Tools & Wizards About Us
puretuning.net screenshot

Report Summary

  • 38

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    57% of other websites

  • 69

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 34% of websites

  • 67

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    24% of websites

  • 71

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    30% of websites

puretuning.net

Puretuning | Supplier for ECU remapping software files

Page Load Speed

3 sec in total

First Response

239 ms

Resources Loaded

2.2 sec

Page Rendered

537 ms

puretuning.net screenshot

About Website

Click here to check amazing Puretuning content. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about puretuning.net

We supply custom-made ECU remapping files to optimise petrol and diesel engines. Download our remapping files in just four simple steps.

Visit puretuning.net

Key Findings

We analyzed Puretuning.net page load time and found that the first response time was 239 ms and then it took 2.7 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 50% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

puretuning.net performance score

38

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value3.4 s

38/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value8.6 s

1/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value6.1 s

45/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value330 ms

76/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.459

19/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value8.4 s

39/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

puretuning.net

239 ms

puretuning.net

367 ms

478 ms

home.js

29 ms

extraStyle.min.css

532 ms

Our browser made a total of 37 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 65% of them (24 requests) were addressed to the original Puretuning.net, 24% (9 requests) were made to Tuning-file-storage.fra1.digitaloceanspaces.com and 5% (2 requests) were made to Google-analytics.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (938 ms) relates to the external source Tuning-file-storage.fra1.digitaloceanspaces.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 1.1 MB (35%)

Content Size

3.3 MB

After Optimization

2.1 MB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Puretuning.net main page is 3.3 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 40% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 2.8 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-92%

Potential reduce by 302.3 kB

  • Original 326.9 kB
  • After minification 297.9 kB
  • After compression 24.7 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 302.3 kB or 92% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-30%

Potential reduce by 840.8 kB

  • Original 2.8 MB
  • After minification 1.9 MB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Puretuning needs image optimization as it can save up to 840.8 kB or 30% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.

JavaScript Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 72 B

  • Original 101.5 kB
  • After minification 101.5 kB
  • After compression 101.4 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

CSS Optimization

-2%

Potential reduce by 791 B

  • Original 46.9 kB
  • After minification 46.9 kB
  • After compression 46.1 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Puretuning.net has all CSS files already compressed.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 4 (12%)

Requests Now

33

After Optimization

29

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 33 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Puretuning. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 5 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

puretuning.net

puretuning.net

239 ms

puretuning.net

puretuning.net

367 ms

478 ms

home.js

home.js

29 ms

extraStyle.min.css

extraStyle.min.css

532 ms

email-decode.min.js

email-decode.min.js

16 ms

js

js

73 ms

analytics.js

analytics.js

23 ms

logo-with.png

logo-with.png

17 ms

collect

collect

22 ms

thumb_2.jpg

thumb_2.jpg

36 ms

Xs99Y1pPOUKVaxIB9TtGcHfvUKPw0KjAxv5fSI0z.png

Xs99Y1pPOUKVaxIB9TtGcHfvUKPw0KjAxv5fSI0z.png

938 ms

paymentmethods_new.png

paymentmethods_new.png

14 ms

logo-black.png

logo-black.png

18 ms

why-car.png

why-car.png

351 ms

why-chiptuning.png

why-chiptuning.png

357 ms

why-testbank.png

why-testbank.png

341 ms

PvPoaPN2CdqErObAImsGgv90iaddV45I5XmFH1Hs.png

PvPoaPN2CdqErObAImsGgv90iaddV45I5XmFH1Hs.png

667 ms

20180115182418_bmw_logo.png

20180115182418_bmw_logo.png

681 ms

0LOe6wNX0IUHni6SMOKVeHSX2QaTiNTfse2fVSA9.png

0LOe6wNX0IUHni6SMOKVeHSX2QaTiNTfse2fVSA9.png

674 ms

oQaGEz9yj1TYHZmnUppX18Ysen86y68Di7xlW1hO.png

oQaGEz9yj1TYHZmnUppX18Ysen86y68Di7xlW1hO.png

589 ms

6KjYm8OW2ZCU66bz5wAnI1csoSnpIr8UPgVVN1H9.png

6KjYm8OW2ZCU66bz5wAnI1csoSnpIr8UPgVVN1H9.png

508 ms

zHQZw8xJ7SU4gY4D2Odu5u9mR1p27jlDQK1XimwA.png

zHQZw8xJ7SU4gY4D2Odu5u9mR1p27jlDQK1XimwA.png

886 ms

QMuvrtL6hU0W1umLuZCFz8jKD6RJJB3pwDCUqUK1.png

QMuvrtL6hU0W1umLuZCFz8jKD6RJJB3pwDCUqUK1.png

785 ms

CKTIyQmRZFRBsFfc1az8vXn7LDBTOVPJ193GRoCL.png

CKTIyQmRZFRBsFfc1az8vXn7LDBTOVPJ193GRoCL.png

762 ms

js

js

58 ms

en.png

en.png

49 ms

show_more_repeat.png

show_more_repeat.png

50 ms

selectArrow.png

selectArrow.png

51 ms

show_more.png

show_more.png

321 ms

show_more_button.png

show_more_button.png

335 ms

fontawesome-webfont.woff

fontawesome-webfont.woff

636 ms

vehicle.png

vehicle.png

331 ms

contact.png

contact.png

328 ms

car-recent-left.png

car-recent-left.png

44 ms

car-recent-right.png

car-recent-right.png

55 ms

home_slider

home_slider

363 ms

Accessibility Review

puretuning.net accessibility score

69

Accessibility Issues

ARIA

These are opportunities to improve the usage of ARIA in your application which may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

[aria-*] attributes do not match their roles

High

ARIA IDs are not unique

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Best Practices

puretuning.net best practices score

67

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Displays images with incorrect aspect ratio

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

High

Missing source maps for large first-party JavaScript

SEO Factors

puretuning.net SEO score

71

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have descriptive text

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Links are not crawlable

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Puretuning.net can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Puretuning.net main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

puretuning.net

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Puretuning. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: