810 ms in total
87 ms
466 ms
257 ms
Visit qj.net now to see the best up-to-date Qj content for Russia and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about qj.net
qj.net
Visit qj.netWe analyzed Qj.net page load time and found that the first response time was 87 ms and then it took 723 ms to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 10% of websites can load faster.
qj.net performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value1.8 s
89/100
10%
Value4.0 s
49/100
25%
Value1.8 s
100/100
10%
Value70 ms
99/100
30%
Value0.016
100/100
15%
Value4.3 s
84/100
10%
87 ms
31 ms
47 ms
48 ms
38 ms
Our browser made a total of 31 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 94% of them (29 requests) were addressed to the original Qj.net, 3% (1 request) were made to Google.com and 3% (1 request) were made to Gstatic.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (200 ms) belongs to the original domain Qj.net.
Page size can be reduced by 87.3 kB (6%)
1.6 MB
1.5 MB
In fact, the total size of Qj.net main page is 1.6 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 85% of websites need less resources to load and that’s why Accessify’s recommendations for optimization and resource minification can be helpful for this project. Images take 1.2 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 49.9 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 49.9 kB or 79% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 36.0 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Qj images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 1.3 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.
Potential reduce by 70 B
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Qj.net has all CSS files already compressed.
Number of requests can be reduced by 11 (52%)
21
10
The browser has sent 21 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Qj. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 7 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 6 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
qj.net
87 ms
style.min.css
31 ms
patterns.min.css
47 ms
enhancements.min.css
48 ms
data-table.css
38 ms
style.css
42 ms
style.css
31 ms
script.js
40 ms
jquery.min.js
47 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
63 ms
api.js
98 ms
ta.js
98 ms
customscripts.js
100 ms
cropped-cropped-logo.png
154 ms
53661541289_6eca95af47_h-7vDnPF.jpeg
82 ms
3053cd8ff0aacefc9b6cd2e85235800b0d204c30-B4tn73.jpeg
83 ms
giphy-UHofVC.gif
153 ms
53658137826_e896e959ab_4k-TggBcD-scaled.jpeg
85 ms
53671487842_811c9793ae_h-oLRZKD.jpeg
84 ms
giphy-4b8JZ4.gif
200 ms
53664316352_cb1a521e63_h-aLQRsQ.jpeg
154 ms
memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsgH1x4gaVc.ttf
43 ms
memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsjr0B4gaVc.ttf
55 ms
memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsjZ0B4gaVc.ttf
27 ms
recaptcha__en.js
70 ms
KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmWUlfBBc9.ttf
23 ms
KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmYUtfBBc9.ttf
62 ms
KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmEU9fBBc9.ttf
36 ms
KFOmCnqEu92Fr1Mu4mxP.ttf
36 ms
feather-magazine.woff
36 ms
feather-magazine.woff
33 ms
qj.net accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
[id] attributes on active, focusable elements are not unique
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Form elements do not have associated labels
Links do not have a discernible name
qj.net best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
qj.net SEO score
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Qj.net can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Qj.net main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
qj.net
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Qj. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: