1.8 sec in total
257 ms
1.4 sec
152 ms
Visit qualitydetectors.com now to see the best up-to-date Qualitydetectors content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about qualitydetectors.com
Buy a domain and see how a premium domain can be the best investment. Your business starts here. Buy a domain today.
Visit qualitydetectors.comWe analyzed Qualitydetectors.com page load time and found that the first response time was 257 ms and then it took 1.5 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 30% of websites can load faster.
qualitydetectors.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value7.7 s
0/100
10%
Value8.7 s
1/100
25%
Value9.4 s
12/100
10%
Value2,910 ms
3/100
30%
Value0.156
74/100
15%
Value22.1 s
1/100
10%
257 ms
217 ms
56 ms
45 ms
62 ms
Our browser made a total of 118 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 0% of them (0 request) were addressed to the original Qualitydetectors.com, 10% (12 requests) were made to D.adroll.com and 5% (6 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (260 ms) relates to the external source Facebook.com.
Page size can be reduced by 709.9 kB (67%)
1.1 MB
342.8 kB
In fact, the total size of Qualitydetectors.com main page is 1.1 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 65% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 815.5 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 35.6 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 35.6 kB or 75% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 3.5 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Qualitydetectors needs image optimization as it can save up to 3.5 kB or 11% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.
Potential reduce by 540.5 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 540.5 kB or 66% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 130.3 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Qualitydetectors.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 130.3 kB or 82% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 71 (74%)
96
25
The browser has sent 96 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Qualitydetectors. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 45 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 10 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
qualitydetectors.com
257 ms
monetate.js
217 ms
application.css
56 ms
ng-modal.css
45 ms
angular.min.js
62 ms
ng-modal.js
43 ms
google_analytics.js
41 ms
google_oauth.js
41 ms
bold_chat.js
43 ms
eloqua.js
48 ms
hotjar.js
51 ms
adroll.js
47 ms
impactRadius.js
51 ms
in.js
61 ms
api.js
72 ms
api:client.js
87 ms
app.js
53 ms
cookies.js
53 ms
socialMedia.js
59 ms
countryDropdown.js
56 ms
monetate.js
55 ms
index.js
57 ms
lander.js
57 ms
seoPages.js
58 ms
sitePages.js
59 ms
search.js
58 ms
modal.js
59 ms
forms.js
58 ms
tldSelector.js
58 ms
setFixedTop.js
59 ms
searchBar.js
62 ms
currency.js
59 ms
trust.js
59 ms
conversion.js
49 ms
tdfs-inner.css
61 ms
tdfs-temp.css
61 ms
thankyou.css
61 ms
entry.js
8 ms
css
25 ms
fontawesome.min.css
10 ms
bd-icons.min.css
11 ms
ga.js
15 ms
foundation-A136666-2811-40ba-bff2-3df3af8bc2ae1.min.js
191 ms
userspace
207 ms
cb=gapi.loaded_0
89 ms
recaptcha__en.js
216 ms
all.js
84 ms
logo-header-2x.png
194 ms
cb=gapi.loaded_1
156 ms
242 ms
hotjar-10205.js
138 ms
elqCfg.min.js
113 ms
bg-main-hilight-fade.jpg
100 ms
bg-select.png
100 ms
bg-target-bd-icon.png
100 ms
__utm.gif
107 ms
postmessageRelay
105 ms
__utm.gif
80 ms
__utm.gif
97 ms
DXI1ORHCpsQm3Vp6mXoaTYnF5uFdDttMLvmWuJdhhgs.ttf
55 ms
cJZKeOuBrn4kERxqtaUH3aCWcynf_cDxXwCLxiixG1c.ttf
77 ms
MTP_ySUJH_bn48VBG8sNSonF5uFdDttMLvmWuJdhhgs.ttf
78 ms
k3k702ZOKiLJc3WVjuplzInF5uFdDttMLvmWuJdhhgs.ttf
90 ms
fontawesome-webfont.woff
54 ms
260 ms
foundation-tags-SD780-3f5b-4f28-957f-6e6dc25a7fc41.min.js
23 ms
svrGP
166 ms
xd_arbiter.php
50 ms
xd_arbiter.php
105 ms
framework
37 ms
iframe
103 ms
modules-043c1e6abe660c48857202e419ff9d8a.js
101 ms
46 ms
fallback
114 ms
collect
109 ms
3193398744-postmessagerelay.js
48 ms
rpc:shindig_random.js
46 ms
1233565733-idpiframe.js
27 ms
cb=gapi.loaded_0
9 ms
fallback__ltr.css
12 ms
payload
32 ms
iframerpc
31 ms
svrGP.aspx
51 ms
css
57 ms
logo_48.png
5 ms
refresh.png
3 ms
audio.png
5 ms
zN7GBFwfMP4uA6AR0HCoLQ.ttf
40 ms
RxZJdnzeo3R5zSexge8UUaCWcynf_cDxXwCLxiixG1c.ttf
41 ms
vms.js
87 ms
roundtrip.js
23 ms
542IK7HHBBFJJFENPFA7WX.js
37 ms
bc.pv
98 ms
fbevents.hashing.js
15 ms
out
17 ms
50 ms
10 ms
23 ms
out
16 ms
out
17 ms
out
23 ms
out
26 ms
out
26 ms
out
27 ms
out
29 ms
out
31 ms
70 ms
65 ms
u.php
186 ms
adsct
109 ms
pixel
44 ms
25 ms
sync
8 ms
377928.gif
9 ms
sd
8 ms
tap.php
18 ms
xd_arbiter.php
11 ms
in
6 ms
qualitydetectors.com accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
[id] attributes on active, focusable elements are not unique
ARIA
These are opportunities to improve the usage of ARIA in your application which may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
ARIA IDs are not unique
qualitydetectors.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Page has valid source maps
qualitydetectors.com SEO score
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Impact
Issue
Links are not crawlable
Page is blocked from indexing
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
EN
N/A
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Qualitydetectors.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and neither this language nor any other was claimed in <html> or <meta> tags. Our system also found out that Qualitydetectors.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
qualitydetectors.com
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Qualitydetectors. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: