Tools & Wizards About Us
antworten.rundfunkbeitrag.de screenshot

Report Summary

  • 43

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    62% of other websites

  • 89

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 71% of websites

  • 75

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    35% of websites

  • 92

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    74% of websites

antworten.rundfunkbeitrag.de

Der Rundfunkbeitrag - Anfrage zur Beitragspflicht beantworten

Page Load Speed

5.2 sec in total

First Response

410 ms

Resources Loaded

4.7 sec

Page Rendered

135 ms

antworten.rundfunkbeitrag.de screenshot

About Website

Visit antworten.rundfunkbeitrag.de now to see the best up-to-date Antworten Rundfunkbeitrag content for Germany and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about antworten.rundfunkbeitrag.de

Mithilfe dieses Online-Formulars können Sie auf Schreiben des Beitragsservice von ARD, ZDF und Deutschlandradio antworten.

Visit antworten.rundfunkbeitrag.de

Key Findings

We analyzed Antworten.rundfunkbeitrag.de page load time and found that the first response time was 410 ms and then it took 4.8 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 70% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

antworten.rundfunkbeitrag.de performance score

43

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value8.5 s

0/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value10.7 s

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value11.2 s

5/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value180 ms

92/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.077

95/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value14.2 s

9/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

antworten.rundfunkbeitrag.de

410 ms

index_ger.html

409 ms

all.css

471 ms

additional.css

664 ms

jquery.fluidContentScroller.css

290 ms

Our browser made a total of 52 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 2% of them (1 request) were addressed to the original Antworten.rundfunkbeitrag.de, 60% (31 requests) were made to Rundfunkbeitrag.de and 38% (20 requests) were made to Online-services.rundfunkbeitrag.de. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.1 sec) relates to the external source Rundfunkbeitrag.de.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 1.4 MB (74%)

Content Size

1.9 MB

After Optimization

502.9 kB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Antworten.rundfunkbeitrag.de main page is 1.9 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 45% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 1.4 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-73%

Potential reduce by 13.0 kB

  • Original 17.8 kB
  • After minification 15.4 kB
  • After compression 4.7 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 2.4 kB, which is 13% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 13.0 kB or 73% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-2%

Potential reduce by 1.5 kB

  • Original 85.3 kB
  • After minification 83.8 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Antworten Rundfunkbeitrag images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-74%

Potential reduce by 1.0 MB

  • Original 1.4 MB
  • After minification 1.3 MB
  • After compression 347.2 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 1.0 MB or 74% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-85%

Potential reduce by 395.1 kB

  • Original 462.3 kB
  • After minification 396.9 kB
  • After compression 67.2 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Antworten.rundfunkbeitrag.de needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 395.1 kB or 85% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 31 (74%)

Requests Now

42

After Optimization

11

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 42 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Antworten Rundfunkbeitrag. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 23 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 10 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

antworten.rundfunkbeitrag.de

antworten.rundfunkbeitrag.de

410 ms

index_ger.html

index_ger.html

409 ms

all.css

all.css

471 ms

additional.css

additional.css

664 ms

jquery.fluidContentScroller.css

jquery.fluidContentScroller.css

290 ms

jquery-ui.structure.min.css

jquery-ui.structure.min.css

289 ms

rundfunkbeitrag.css

rundfunkbeitrag.css

383 ms

tooltipster.css

tooltipster.css

290 ms

jquery-3.6.0.js

jquery-3.6.0.js

1081 ms

jquery-migrate-3.3.2.js

jquery-migrate-3.3.2.js

480 ms

jquery-ui.min-1.12.1.js

jquery-ui.min-1.12.1.js

946 ms

jquery.placeholder.js

jquery.placeholder.js

477 ms

jquery.tooltipster.js

jquery.tooltipster.js

568 ms

webcodes.js

webcodes.js

759 ms

smarttag.js

smarttag.js

762 ms

analyse.js

analyse.js

671 ms

jquery.ba-postmessage.js

jquery.ba-postmessage.js

758 ms

bootstrap.js

bootstrap.js

946 ms

rundfunkbeitrag.js

rundfunkbeitrag.js

854 ms

glossar.js

glossar.js

854 ms

rand.bg.js

rand.bg.js

857 ms

jquery.fluidContentScroller.js

jquery.fluidContentScroller.js

949 ms

jquery_circleProgress.js

jquery_circleProgress.js

951 ms

senderlogos-1.png

senderlogos-1.png

108 ms

einfach-haus-gruen.svg

einfach-haus-gruen.svg

102 ms

ardzdfdradiobs2020.png

ardzdfdradiobs2020.png

104 ms

einfach-lupe.svg

einfach-lupe.svg

105 ms

bodybg.jpg

bodybg.jpg

101 ms

titillium-semibold.woff

titillium-semibold.woff

98 ms

titillium-regular.woff

titillium-regular.woff

173 ms

mailingAntwortAllgemein.xhtml

mailingAntwortAllgemein.xhtml

892 ms

glyphicons-halflings-regular.woff

glyphicons-halflings-regular.woff

115 ms

print.css

print.css

98 ms

theme.css

theme.css

242 ms

primeicons.css

primeicons.css

440 ms

all.min.css

all.min.css

870 ms

additional.min.css

additional.min.css

659 ms

jquery.js

jquery.js

882 ms

bootstrap.bundle.min.js

bootstrap.bundle.min.js

789 ms

jquery.ba-postmessage.min.js

jquery.ba-postmessage.min.js

356 ms

jquery-ui.min.js

jquery-ui.min.js

588 ms

smarttag.js

smarttag.js

775 ms

webanalyseTool.min.js

webanalyseTool.min.js

700 ms

jsf.js

jsf.js

920 ms

additional.min.js

additional.min.js

813 ms

titillium-regular.svg

titillium-regular.svg

335 ms

titillium-regular.woff

titillium-regular.woff

122 ms

titillium-semibold.svg

titillium-semibold.svg

361 ms

titillium-semibold.woff

titillium-semibold.woff

121 ms

glyphicons-halflings-regular.woff

glyphicons-halflings-regular.woff

139 ms

iconfont.svg

iconfont.svg

122 ms

iconfont.woff

iconfont.woff

230 ms

Accessibility Review

antworten.rundfunkbeitrag.de accessibility score

89

Accessibility Issues

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Best practices

These items highlight common accessibility best practices.

Impact

Issue

High

[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.

Best Practices

antworten.rundfunkbeitrag.de best practices score

75

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

High

Page has valid source maps

SEO Factors

antworten.rundfunkbeitrag.de SEO score

92

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    DE

  • Language Claimed

    DE

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Antworten.rundfunkbeitrag.de can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that German is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Antworten.rundfunkbeitrag.de main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

antworten.rundfunkbeitrag.de

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Antworten Rundfunkbeitrag. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: