Tools & Wizards About Us
dev.rocketium.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 10

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    23% of other websites

  • 84

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 56% of websites

  • 67

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    24% of websites

  • 79

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    40% of websites

dev.rocketium.com

Rocketium | Agile CreativeOps Platform

Page Load Speed

1.5 sec in total

First Response

12 ms

Resources Loaded

1.1 sec

Page Rendered

374 ms

dev.rocketium.com screenshot

About Website

Welcome to dev.rocketium.com homepage info - get ready to check Dev Rocketium best content for India right away, or after learning these important things about dev.rocketium.com

Rocketium is an agile CreativeOps platform that helps you go to market faster, at lower costs. Do more with your existing teams, processes and tools.

Visit dev.rocketium.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Dev.rocketium.com page load time and found that the first response time was 12 ms and then it took 1.5 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 30% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

dev.rocketium.com performance score

10

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value3.1 s

46/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value7.4 s

4/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value8.4 s

18/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value3,140 ms

2/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.583

11/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value21.8 s

1/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

dev.rocketium.com

12 ms

dev.rocketium.com

96 ms

api.js

53 ms

js

93 ms

ney6xii.js

116 ms

Our browser made a total of 59 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 71% of them (42 requests) were addressed to the original Dev.rocketium.com, 8% (5 requests) were made to Unpkg.com and 3% (2 requests) were made to Google-analytics.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (871 ms) belongs to the original domain Dev.rocketium.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 533.7 kB (35%)

Content Size

1.5 MB

After Optimization

1.0 MB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Dev.rocketium.com main page is 1.5 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 60% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 910.1 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-80%

Potential reduce by 51.8 kB

  • Original 64.4 kB
  • After minification 56.2 kB
  • After compression 12.6 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 8.2 kB, which is 13% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 51.8 kB or 80% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-9%

Potential reduce by 79.3 kB

  • Original 910.1 kB
  • After minification 830.7 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Dev Rocketium images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-69%

Potential reduce by 307.5 kB

  • Original 447.3 kB
  • After minification 447.3 kB
  • After compression 139.8 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 307.5 kB or 69% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-84%

Potential reduce by 95.0 kB

  • Original 112.6 kB
  • After minification 81.8 kB
  • After compression 17.6 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Dev.rocketium.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 95.0 kB or 84% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 23 (41%)

Requests Now

56

After Optimization

33

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 56 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Dev Rocketium. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 15 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 10 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

dev.rocketium.com

dev.rocketium.com

12 ms

dev.rocketium.com

dev.rocketium.com

96 ms

api.js

api.js

53 ms

js

js

93 ms

ney6xii.js

ney6xii.js

116 ms

bootstrap.min.css

bootstrap.min.css

51 ms

owl.carousel.min.css

owl.carousel.min.css

73 ms

owl.theme.default.min.css

owl.theme.default.min.css

106 ms

animate.min.css

animate.min.css

68 ms

cookieconsent.min.css

cookieconsent.min.css

105 ms

header.css

header.css

117 ms

home.css

home.css

168 ms

aos.css

aos.css

84 ms

styles.css

styles.css

103 ms

text-image-module.css

text-image-module.css

135 ms

v2.js

v2.js

134 ms

player.js

player.js

71 ms

lazysizes.min.js

lazysizes.min.js

157 ms

home-bundle.min.js

home-bundle.min.js

264 ms

bootstrap.bundle.min.js

bootstrap.bundle.min.js

68 ms

owl.carousel.min.js

owl.carousel.min.js

157 ms

api.js

api.js

68 ms

aos.js

aos.js

86 ms

gtm.js

gtm.js

67 ms

a.js

a.js

24 ms

marketing-ribon.png

marketing-ribon.png

127 ms

production.webp

production.webp

425 ms

Compliance.webp

Compliance.webp

261 ms

Analytics.webp

Analytics.webp

215 ms

home-logo-01.png

home-logo-01.png

155 ms

home-logo-02.png

home-logo-02.png

201 ms

home-logo-08.png

home-logo-08.png

231 ms

home-logo-09.png

home-logo-09.png

254 ms

home-logo-05.png

home-logo-05.png

303 ms

home-logo-10.png

home-logo-10.png

285 ms

home-slider-image1.webp

home-slider-image1.webp

364 ms

home-slider-image2.webp

home-slider-image2.webp

401 ms

home-slider-image1-mobile.webp

home-slider-image1-mobile.webp

318 ms

home-slider-image2-mobile.webp

home-slider-image2-mobile.webp

387 ms

comparison-tablet-v1.png

comparison-tablet-v1.png

491 ms

comparison-tablet-v2.png

comparison-tablet-v2.png

414 ms

text-image-01.webp

text-image-01.webp

475 ms

text-image-02.webp

text-image-02.webp

518 ms

text-image-03.webp

text-image-03.webp

593 ms

case-study-1.webp

case-study-1.webp

477 ms

case-study-2.webp

case-study-2.webp

485 ms

case-study-3.webp

case-study-3.webp

585 ms

drive.png

drive.png

611 ms

dropbox.png

dropbox.png

546 ms

ps.png

ps.png

546 ms

slack.png

slack.png

617 ms

tool1.png

tool1.png

612 ms

index.js

index.js

21 ms

tool2.png

tool2.png

601 ms

styles.css

styles.css

16 ms

tool3.png

tool3.png

612 ms

home-last-section.png

home-last-section.png

871 ms

horizontal-footer-banner.png

horizontal-footer-banner.png

665 ms

fprom.js

fprom.js

17 ms

Accessibility Review

dev.rocketium.com accessibility score

84

Accessibility Issues

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Buttons do not have an accessible name

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Best practices

These items highlight common accessibility best practices.

Impact

Issue

High

[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.

Best Practices

dev.rocketium.com best practices score

67

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

High

Page has valid source maps

SEO Factors

dev.rocketium.com SEO score

79

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have descriptive text

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Links are not crawlable

High

robots.txt is not valid

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Dev.rocketium.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Dev.rocketium.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

dev.rocketium.com

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Dev Rocketium. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: