9 sec in total
1.1 sec
5.7 sec
2.1 sec
Click here to check amazing Engage Rsec content for India. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about engage.rsec.co.in
Improve user experience via web banner, mobile push, email, web push, in-app notifications and predictive analytics.
Visit engage.rsec.co.inWe analyzed Engage.rsec.co.in page load time and found that the first response time was 1.1 sec and then it took 7.9 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 85% of websites can load faster.
engage.rsec.co.in performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value5.3 s
7/100
10%
Value12.4 s
0/100
25%
Value12.1 s
3/100
10%
Value5,130 ms
0/100
30%
Value0.197
62/100
15%
Value15.1 s
7/100
10%
1099 ms
97 ms
112 ms
552 ms
490 ms
Our browser made a total of 83 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 75% of them (62 requests) were addressed to the original Engage.rsec.co.in, 12% (10 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 4% (3 requests) were made to Google-analytics.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (2.6 sec) belongs to the original domain Engage.rsec.co.in.
Page size can be reduced by 93.9 kB (6%)
1.5 MB
1.4 MB
In fact, the total size of Engage.rsec.co.in main page is 1.5 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 70% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 1.2 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 28.9 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 7.1 kB, which is 21% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 28.9 kB or 85% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 39.9 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Engage Rsec images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 8.4 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.
Potential reduce by 16.8 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Engage.rsec.co.in needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 16.8 kB or 14% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 37 (54%)
69
32
The browser has sent 69 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Engage Rsec. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 26 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 13 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
engage.rsec.co.in
1099 ms
css
97 ms
css
112 ms
bootstrap.min.css
552 ms
font-awesome.css
490 ms
et-line.css
510 ms
jquery.mCustomScrollbar.css
511 ms
animate.css
638 ms
magnific-popup.css
627 ms
owl.carousel.css
734 ms
global.css
1259 ms
custom.css
790 ms
dark.css
796 ms
red.css
791 ms
jquery.min.js
1044 ms
jquery.migrate.min.js
974 ms
bootstrap.min.js
1043 ms
jquery.back-to-top.js
1043 ms
jquery.smooth-scroll.js
1044 ms
jquery.animsition.min.js
1216 ms
jquery.mCustomScrollbar.concat.min.js
2114 ms
waypoints.min.js
2122 ms
jquery.counterup.min.js
2120 ms
jquery.magnific-popup.min.js
2121 ms
jquery.wow.min.js
2062 ms
jquery.equal-height.js
2065 ms
owl.carousel.min.js
2068 ms
app.js
2070 ms
header-sticky.js
2071 ms
animsition.js
2073 ms
scrollbar.js
2074 ms
magnific-popup.js
2078 ms
wow.js
2079 ms
form-modal.js
2080 ms
equal-height.js
2080 ms
counters.js
2080 ms
owl-carousel.js
2169 ms
animated-headline.js
2170 ms
analytics.js
558 ms
gtm.js
650 ms
logo-default-white.svg
610 ms
logo-default.svg
612 ms
landing.jpg
1050 ms
features-1.jpg
1049 ms
features-2.jpg
874 ms
features-3.jpg
1081 ms
features-4.jpg
1386 ms
2.png
1852 ms
counter-bg.jpg
1386 ms
rb-black.png
1310 ms
rb.png
1309 ms
bb-black.png
1373 ms
bb.png
1565 ms
ib-black.png
1563 ms
ib.png
1565 ms
rel-black.png
1608 ms
rel.png
1627 ms
cb-black.png
1568 ms
cb.png
1562 ms
sl-black.png
1555 ms
sl.png
1599 ms
cl-black.png
1616 ms
cl.png
1820 ms
cta.jpg
2569 ms
KFOmCnqEu92Fr1Mu4mxP.ttf
283 ms
KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmEU9fBBc9.ttf
333 ms
KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmSU5fBBc9.ttf
333 ms
KFOkCnqEu92Fr1MmgVxIIzc.ttf
336 ms
KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmWUlfBBc9.ttf
333 ms
KFOjCnqEu92Fr1Mu51TjASc6CsE.ttf
334 ms
et-line.woff
1741 ms
tDbK2oqRg1oM3QBjjcaDkOr4nAfcGw.ttf
347 ms
tDbX2oqRg1oM3QBjjcaDkOr4lLz5CwOnTQ.ttf
346 ms
tDbI2oqRg1oM3QBjjcaDkOr9rAA.ttf
327 ms
tDbV2oqRg1oM3QBjjcaDkOJGiRD7OwQ.ttf
323 ms
fontawesome-webfont.woff
1800 ms
tac.min.js
923 ms
collect
115 ms
collect
211 ms
collect
101 ms
ga-audiences
91 ms
collect
20 ms
ga-audiences
69 ms
engage.rsec.co.in accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have a discernible name
Tables and lists
These are opportunities to improve the experience of reading tabular or list data using assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Lists do not contain only <li> elements and script supporting elements (<script> and <template>).
List items (<li>) are not contained within <ul> or <ol> parent elements.
Best practices
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
Impact
Issue
[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.
engage.rsec.co.in best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
engage.rsec.co.in SEO score
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Impact
Issue
Links are not crawlable
Page is blocked from indexing
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Engage.rsec.co.in can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Engage.rsec.co.in main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
engage.rsec.co.in
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Engage Rsec. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: