Tools & Wizards About Us
maintenance.rogers.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 22

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    40% of other websites

  • 84

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 56% of websites

  • 75

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    35% of websites

  • 86

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    60% of websites

maintenance.rogers.com

Wireless, Internet, TV, Home Monitoring, and Home phone - Rogers

Page Load Speed

1.7 sec in total

First Response

68 ms

Resources Loaded

1 sec

Page Rendered

587 ms

maintenance.rogers.com screenshot

About Website

Visit maintenance.rogers.com now to see the best up-to-date Maintenance Rogers content for Canada and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about maintenance.rogers.com

Choose from a Wireless Device or Plan that's right for you! At Rogers we offer various Internet, TV, Home Monitoring, and Home Phone options.

Visit maintenance.rogers.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Maintenance.rogers.com page load time and found that the first response time was 68 ms and then it took 1.6 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 35% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

maintenance.rogers.com performance score

22

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value2.6 s

63/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value12.6 s

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value9.8 s

10/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value21,520 ms

0/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value37.5 s

0/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

www.rogers.com

68 ms

runtime.da5a21f1bc15a72c.js

67 ms

main.b6279c7a0f58a369.js

446 ms

polyfills.fca47a383af6fa34.js

142 ms

scripts.a304dc9f60ef896b.js

67 ms

Our browser made a total of 20 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 0% of them (0 request) were addressed to the original Maintenance.rogers.com, 35% (7 requests) were made to Assets.rogers-assets.com and 15% (3 requests) were made to Images.ctfassets.net. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (446 ms) relates to the external source Rogers.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 139.6 kB (78%)

Content Size

179.5 kB

After Optimization

39.8 kB

  • HTML
  • Images

In fact, the total size of Maintenance.rogers.com main page is 179.5 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 45% of websites need less resources to load. HTML takes 168.7 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-81%

Potential reduce by 136.1 kB

  • Original 168.7 kB
  • After minification 165.1 kB
  • After compression 32.6 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 136.1 kB or 81% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-33%

Potential reduce by 3.6 kB

  • Original 10.8 kB
  • After minification 7.2 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Maintenance Rogers needs image optimization as it can save up to 3.6 kB or 33% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 5 (42%)

Requests Now

12

After Optimization

7

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 12 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Maintenance Rogers. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 6 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

www.rogers.com

www.rogers.com

68 ms

runtime.da5a21f1bc15a72c.js

runtime.da5a21f1bc15a72c.js

67 ms

main.b6279c7a0f58a369.js

main.b6279c7a0f58a369.js

446 ms

polyfills.fca47a383af6fa34.js

polyfills.fca47a383af6fa34.js

142 ms

scripts.a304dc9f60ef896b.js

scripts.a304dc9f60ef896b.js

67 ms

58MW6-74XQ7-7295K-C7VCE-JMLBW

58MW6-74XQ7-7295K-C7VCE-JMLBW

44 ms

rogers.svg

rogers.svg

42 ms

App_Store_200x48.png

App_Store_200x48.png

34 ms

Google_Play_200x48.png

Google_Play_200x48.png

34 ms

config.json

config.json

25 ms

TedNext-DemiBold.ttf

TedNext-DemiBold.ttf

280 ms

TedNext-Regular.ttf

TedNext-Regular.ttf

255 ms

TedNext-Medium.ttf

TedNext-Medium.ttf

281 ms

TedNext-Light.ttf

TedNext-Light.ttf

434 ms

TedNext-SemiBold.ttf

TedNext-SemiBold.ttf

307 ms

TedNext-Bold.ttf

TedNext-Bold.ttf

306 ms

rds-icon.woff

rds-icon.woff

269 ms

styles.990a1232cda96460.css

styles.990a1232cda96460.css

64 ms

styles.990a1232cda96460.css

styles.990a1232cda96460.css

74 ms

48 ms

Accessibility Review

maintenance.rogers.com accessibility score

84

Accessibility Issues

ARIA

These are opportunities to improve the usage of ARIA in your application which may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

[role]s do not have all required [aria-*] attributes

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Buttons do not have an accessible name

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

[id] attributes on active, focusable elements are not unique

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Best Practices

maintenance.rogers.com best practices score

75

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Displays images with incorrect aspect ratio

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

High

Missing source maps for large first-party JavaScript

SEO Factors

maintenance.rogers.com SEO score

86

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have descriptive text

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Links are not crawlable

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Maintenance.rogers.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Maintenance.rogers.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

maintenance.rogers.com

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Maintenance Rogers. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: