3.8 sec in total
759 ms
2.8 sec
236 ms
Click here to check amazing Ramsdenfieldstonewalls content. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about ramsdenfieldstonewalls.net
Read More STONE MASONRY WORK WATERPROOFING SERVICES Read More
Visit ramsdenfieldstonewalls.netWe analyzed Ramsdenfieldstonewalls.net page load time and found that the first response time was 759 ms and then it took 3 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 55% of websites can load faster.
ramsdenfieldstonewalls.net performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value5.0 s
9/100
10%
Value18.0 s
0/100
25%
Value9.1 s
13/100
10%
Value790 ms
37/100
30%
Value0.002
100/100
15%
Value13.1 s
12/100
10%
759 ms
47 ms
72 ms
74 ms
79 ms
Our browser made a total of 74 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 86% of them (64 requests) were addressed to the original Ramsdenfieldstonewalls.net, 8% (6 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 3% (2 requests) were made to Pro.fontawesome.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (759 ms) belongs to the original domain Ramsdenfieldstonewalls.net.
Page size can be reduced by 321.5 kB (12%)
2.6 MB
2.3 MB
In fact, the total size of Ramsdenfieldstonewalls.net main page is 2.6 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 65% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 2.0 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 41.8 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 41.8 kB or 79% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 120.0 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Ramsdenfieldstonewalls images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 52.0 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 52.0 kB or 22% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 107.6 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Ramsdenfieldstonewalls.net needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 107.6 kB or 29% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 56 (89%)
63
7
The browser has sent 63 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Ramsdenfieldstonewalls. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 32 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 26 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
ramsdenfieldstonewalls.net
759 ms
header-footer-elementor.css
47 ms
elementor-icons.min.css
72 ms
frontend-lite.min.css
74 ms
swiper.min.css
79 ms
post-22.css
72 ms
frontend-lite.min.css
77 ms
materialdesignicons.css
120 ms
owl.carousel.css
96 ms
frontend.css
97 ms
uael-frontend.min.css
146 ms
global.css
136 ms
post-27.css
100 ms
frontend.css
141 ms
post-48.css
139 ms
post-57.css
143 ms
style.css
170 ms
style.css
179 ms
style.css
182 ms
css
31 ms
fontawesome.min.css
174 ms
solid.min.css
178 ms
regular.min.css
186 ms
brands.min.css
187 ms
jquery.min.js
187 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
188 ms
all.css
48 ms
js
75 ms
primary-navigation.js
185 ms
responsive-embeds.js
190 ms
uael-nav-menu.min.js
192 ms
jquery_resize.min.js
194 ms
js_cookie.min.js
194 ms
webpack-pro.runtime.min.js
198 ms
webpack.runtime.min.js
200 ms
frontend-modules.min.js
214 ms
wp-polyfill-inert.min.js
216 ms
regenerator-runtime.min.js
217 ms
wp-polyfill.min.js
244 ms
hooks.min.js
209 ms
i18n.min.js
184 ms
frontend.min.js
172 ms
waypoints.min.js
173 ms
core.min.js
171 ms
frontend.min.js
175 ms
elements-handlers.min.js
176 ms
jquery.sticky.min.js
172 ms
owl.carousel.js
172 ms
nivo-lightbox.js
172 ms
odometer.js
142 ms
waypoint.js
136 ms
imagesloaded.min.js
136 ms
isotope.pkgd.js
150 ms
ResizeSensor.js
151 ms
theia-sticky-sidebar.js
127 ms
frontend.js
229 ms
style.css
122 ms
logo_landing_page-pm00mxsdwkrbu8rwfaz2xykcchnd3syxix4d7lolxc.png
52 ms
RamsdenLogoHeader3.png
53 ms
Rectangle-103.png
191 ms
Rectangle-102.png
190 ms
Footer_logo.png
51 ms
polyfills.js
41 ms
KFOmCnqEu92Fr1Mu4mxM.woff
63 ms
KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmEU9fBBc-.woff
68 ms
KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmSU5fBBc-.woff
80 ms
KFOkCnqEu92Fr1MmgVxIIzQ.woff
96 ms
KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmWUlfBBc-.woff
96 ms
KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmYUtfBBc-.woff
96 ms
fa-solid-900.woff
85 ms
fa-regular-400.woff
60 ms
fa-brands-400.woff
46 ms
fa-brands-400.woff
60 ms
print.css
26 ms
ramsdenfieldstonewalls.net accessibility score
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have a discernible name
ramsdenfieldstonewalls.net best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
ramsdenfieldstonewalls.net SEO score
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have descriptive text
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Ramsdenfieldstonewalls.net can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Ramsdenfieldstonewalls.net main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
ramsdenfieldstonewalls.net
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Ramsdenfieldstonewalls. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: