943 ms in total
46 ms
542 ms
355 ms
Visit rankingco.com now to see the best up-to-date Ranking Co content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about rankingco.com
We're a team of digital creatives dedicated to helping businesses succeed. We craft digital marketing campaigns that actually work. Get in touch with us today. Let's get you found on Google!
Visit rankingco.comWe analyzed Rankingco.com page load time and found that the first response time was 46 ms and then it took 897 ms to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 20% of websites can load faster.
rankingco.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value1.8 s
89/100
10%
Value3.8 s
54/100
25%
Value3.6 s
87/100
10%
Value1,400 ms
16/100
30%
Value0.329
35/100
15%
Value10.9 s
21/100
10%
46 ms
139 ms
120 ms
203 ms
235 ms
Our browser made a total of 22 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 9% of them (2 requests) were addressed to the original Rankingco.com, 32% (7 requests) were made to Lirp.cdn-website.com and 18% (4 requests) were made to Irp.cdn-website.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (257 ms) relates to the external source Lirp.cdn-website.com.
Page size can be reduced by 154.4 kB (38%)
407.7 kB
253.3 kB
In fact, the total size of Rankingco.com main page is 407.7 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 60% of websites need less resources to load. HTML takes 225.7 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 153.9 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 153.9 kB or 68% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 343 B
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Ranking Co images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 158 B
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.
Number of requests can be reduced by 7 (37%)
19
12
The browser has sent 19 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Ranking Co. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 8 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.
rankingco.com
46 ms
www.rankingco.com
139 ms
gtm.js
120 ms
1-4cc5f8ab-1920w.png
203 ms
rankingco-logo-yellow.svg
235 ms
jquery-3.7.0.min.js
140 ms
d-js-one-runtime-unified-desktop.min.js
155 ms
d-js-jquery-migrate.min.js
156 ms
js
163 ms
Amber-Porter---CEO---RankingCo-1500w.webp
187 ms
Kerry-Anderson_Co-Founder_RankingCo-1500w.webp
153 ms
rankingco-logo-white.svg
184 ms
BS-8-1920w.jpg
257 ms
arrow-42w.png
254 ms
Stephann-Lorde-458w.jpg
254 ms
logos-716w.png
182 ms
transparent_background-973w.png
255 ms
Untitled+design+%283%29-973w.png
254 ms
analytics.js
125 ms
fbevents.js
133 ms
xfbml.customerchat.js
111 ms
fontawesome-webfont.woff
70 ms
rankingco.com accessibility score
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
<frame> or <iframe> elements do not have a title
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Links do not have a discernible name
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
Tables and lists
These are opportunities to improve the experience of reading tabular or list data using assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
List items (<li>) are not contained within <ul> or <ol> parent elements.
rankingco.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Displays images with incorrect aspect ratio
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Browser errors were logged to the console
rankingco.com SEO score
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have descriptive text
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Impact
Issue
Links are not crawlable
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Rankingco.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Rankingco.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
rankingco.com
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Ranking Co. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: