Report Summary

  • 98

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    95% of other websites

  • 90

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 74% of websites

  • 92

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    80% of websites

  • 75

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    32% of websites

razorproxy.com

Razorproxy - Maintenance

Page Load Speed

266 ms in total

First Response

49 ms

Resources Loaded

155 ms

Page Rendered

62 ms

razorproxy.com screenshot

About Website

Welcome to razorproxy.com homepage info - get ready to check Razorproxy best content right away, or after learning these important things about razorproxy.com

Visit razorproxy.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Razorproxy.com page load time and found that the first response time was 49 ms and then it took 217 ms to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is an excellent result, as only a small number of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

razorproxy.com performance score

98

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value1.9 s

88/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value1.9 s

98/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value1.9 s

100/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value0 ms

100/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.004

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value1.9 s

100/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

razorproxy.com

49 ms

css2

29 ms

1Ptxg8zYS_SKggPN4iEgvnHyvveLxVvoooCP.ttf

20 ms

1Ptxg8zYS_SKggPN4iEgvnHyvveLxVs9pYCP.ttf

25 ms

Our browser made a total of 4 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 25% of them (1 request) were addressed to the original Razorproxy.com, 50% (2 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 25% (1 request) were made to Fonts.googleapis.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (49 ms) belongs to the original domain Razorproxy.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 17.4 kB (3%)

Content Size

647.2 kB

After Optimization

629.8 kB

In fact, the total size of Razorproxy.com main page is 647.2 kB. This result falls within a big category (top 100 000) of medium weight web pages. Only a small number of websites need less resources to load. Images take 342.9 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-68%

Potential reduce by 5.2 kB

  • Original 7.7 kB
  • After minification 7.1 kB
  • After compression 2.4 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 5.2 kB or 68% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-2%

Potential reduce by 6.5 kB

  • Original 342.9 kB
  • After minification 336.4 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Razorproxy images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-2%

Potential reduce by 3.7 kB

  • Original 170.7 kB
  • After minification 170.6 kB
  • After compression 167.0 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

CSS Optimization

-2%

Potential reduce by 2.0 kB

  • Original 126.0 kB
  • After minification 126.0 kB
  • After compression 124.0 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Razorproxy.com has all CSS files already compressed.

Requests Breakdown

We found no issues to fix!

Requests Now

1

After Optimization

1

The browser has sent 1 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Razorproxy. According to our analytics all requests are already optimized.

Accessibility Review

razorproxy.com accessibility score

90

Accessibility Issues

Internationalization and localization

These are opportunities to improve the interpretation of your content by users in different locales.

Impact

Issue

High

<html> element does not have a [lang] attribute

Best Practices

razorproxy.com best practices score

92

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

SEO Factors

razorproxy.com SEO score

75

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Page is blocked from indexing

High

robots.txt is not valid

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    N/A

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Razorproxy.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and neither this language nor any other was claimed in <html> or <meta> tags. Our system also found out that Razorproxy.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Razorproxy. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: