3.3 sec in total
294 ms
2.7 sec
268 ms
Visit rbh.co.uk now to see the best up-to-date RBH content for United Kingdom and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about rbh.co.uk
Hello, we're RBH. Feel free to take a look around and find out what it is that makes us stand out from the crowd.
Visit rbh.co.ukWe analyzed Rbh.co.uk page load time and found that the first response time was 294 ms and then it took 3 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 55% of websites can load faster.
rbh.co.uk performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value3.5 s
35/100
10%
Value4.4 s
39/100
25%
Value15.3 s
1/100
10%
Value2,970 ms
3/100
30%
Value0.902
3/100
15%
Value16.1 s
6/100
10%
294 ms
1094 ms
318 ms
162 ms
68 ms
Our browser made a total of 59 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 37% of them (22 requests) were addressed to the original Rbh.co.uk, 31% (18 requests) were made to Use.typekit.net and 12% (7 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.3 sec) belongs to the original domain Rbh.co.uk.
Page size can be reduced by 941.9 kB (37%)
2.5 MB
1.6 MB
In fact, the total size of Rbh.co.uk main page is 2.5 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 60% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 1.5 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 494.4 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 159.4 kB, which is 30% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 494.4 kB or 92% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 79.7 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. RBH images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 278.5 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 278.5 kB or 72% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 89.2 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Rbh.co.uk needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 89.2 kB or 86% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 15 (44%)
34
19
The browser has sent 34 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of RBH. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 10 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 7 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
rbh.co.uk
294 ms
www.rbh.co.uk
1094 ms
core.css
318 ms
autocomplete.css
162 ms
css
68 ms
css
80 ms
font-awesome.min.css
46 ms
jquery.min.js
85 ms
jquery.autocomplete.js
163 ms
zvp3dfr.js
193 ms
owl.carousel.css
166 ms
owl.carousel.min.js
282 ms
20313.js
124 ms
core.js
278 ms
ffff
184 ms
ga.js
89 ms
button_top.jpg
220 ms
logo.jpg
220 ms
13_tablet.jpg
636 ms
13_mobile.jpg
501 ms
button_close.jpg
333 ms
437_portrait_colour_thumb.jpg
711 ms
436_landscape_colour_thumb.jpg
815 ms
432_landscape_colour_thumb.jpg
691 ms
434_landscape_colour_thumb.jpg
845 ms
433_landscape_colour_thumb.jpg
953 ms
430_portrait_colour_thumb.jpg
1263 ms
435_landscape_colour_mini.jpg
935 ms
431_landscape_colour_mini.jpg
943 ms
428_landscape_colour_mini.jpg
1058 ms
zhcz-_WihjSQC0oHJ9TCYBsxEYwM7FgeyaSgU71cLG0.woff
183 ms
IQHow_FEYlDC4Gzy_m8fcgFhaRv2pGgT5Kf0An0s4MM.woff
240 ms
cJZKeOuBrn4kERxqtaUH3T8E0i7KZn-EPnyo3HZu7kw.woff
292 ms
DXI1ORHCpsQm3Vp6mXoaTXhCUOGz7vYGh680lGh-uXM.woff
294 ms
MTP_ySUJH_bn48VBG8sNSnhCUOGz7vYGh680lGh-uXM.woff
349 ms
k3k702ZOKiLJc3WVjuplzHhCUOGz7vYGh680lGh-uXM.woff
348 ms
EInbV5DfGHOiMmvb1Xr-hnhCUOGz7vYGh680lGh-uXM.woff
349 ms
__utm.gif
152 ms
WidgetScript
563 ms
4EiaVsucGuXq7W4ygwkNgqcu7Sg40A_eZBmmGJCqqttffHEUggMWeMI6MK6f5Mt.eot
127 ms
KQd6jrmKeRlCGuvpxo9_-9HNbuu2Q4qXVbv79mB94eCffOHUggMWeMI6MK6f5gI.eot
186 ms
abZFRmIHTVuqMPKTChMiNAgrHJAcMHMfTF5UsdwwzDbffHhUggMWeMI6MK6f5Mb.eot
187 ms
2e-t8CJULNm1PIRWBzlJlU13lYhzsYkZdpI8cgkKtfIffOeUggMWeMI6MK6f5MS.eot
249 ms
F6LyVJI-bqT1FI9EOXdNCWHSdfQUyV4AmL0fU_5dKhjff4AgggMWeMI6MK6f5Mt.eot
301 ms
aSEt_FJLp7M9nP-8KDNc2WFAGXSdf2QMIpsXfo1FcRbff4HgggMWeMI6MK6f5gI.eot
306 ms
ML06kq5Ass9gsC_JdibeHFqhhDUQcnOaTIwfg8ne8M6ff5WcggMWeMI6MK6f5Mb.eot
337 ms
twzgbLo2RhiMB1DkeyuXEDW7s4A5aCGuLvJIISP5Ow3ff4egggMWeMI6MK6f5MS.eot
333 ms
vprZn3hmkPFHWbVoNuYsKbCtXM-aiP0YPcYSoFl1dK3ffOnMggMWeMI6MK6f5Mt.eot
301 ms
EhJ7ypm3AoGuyokZYJVKt1v3xH9ZPj5Gu7JqzyZMueXffO_MggMWeMI6MK6f5gI.eot
299 ms
JksgzQ3bKDA9e7Dsnsa7BxEJcP24n5FF98zHXL-f-i6ffO1MggMWeMI6MK6f5Mb.eot
375 ms
a5-LEeWs7dbOgV-Zy0RIYMFIrFQDtcGbsc8zx9h3RZtffOaMggMWeMI6MK6f5MS.eot
373 ms
YKLOq5ayCr8N6Rl6d9mVv_53Piw8wB6GiCG9WQn_5bqffw0gggMWeMI6MK6f5Mt.eot
373 ms
HaxQ8jODWwrCQyv6BkG9IWpeMCS4a-DSp4C0yVcQVK6ffwhgggMWeMI6MK6f5gI.eot
372 ms
0w8rvPzTVQMoye8V89rwVuKGggykbo6dFiaDQoFNQP9ffw7gggMWeMI6MK6f5Mb.eot
374 ms
ysk2j9WWqPXxo4qoanSV9ReiFVvKadI_TlvebxDm3QjffwkgggMWeMI6MK6f5MS.eot
373 ms
_WidgetJPCB0
84 ms
_WidgetJPCB1.js
74 ms
jquery.min.js
32 ms
147285691458255940421.js
8 ms
rbh.co.uk accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have a discernible name
Best practices
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
Impact
Issue
[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.
rbh.co.uk best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Displays images with incorrect aspect ratio
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
rbh.co.uk SEO score
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Rbh.co.uk can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Rbh.co.uk main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
rbh.co.uk
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of RBH. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: