Tools & Wizards About Us
rbt.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 25

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    44% of other websites

  • 97

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 92% of websites

  • 83

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    55% of websites

  • 100

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    94% of websites

rbt.com

Armstrong Bank | Serving Oklahoma & Arkansas Since 1909

Page Load Speed

2.4 sec in total

First Response

32 ms

Resources Loaded

2 sec

Page Rendered

355 ms

rbt.com screenshot

About Website

Visit rbt.com now to see the best up-to-date Rbt content for United States and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about rbt.com

Armstrong Bank is committed to serving the needs of individuals and businesses in northeast Oklahoma and west Arkansas. Learn more about partnering with Armstrong Bank.

Visit rbt.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Rbt.com page load time and found that the first response time was 32 ms and then it took 2.4 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 45% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

rbt.com performance score

25

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value3.7 s

28/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value19.9 s

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value8.4 s

18/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value1,040 ms

26/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.133

81/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value18.0 s

3/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

rbt.com

32 ms

rbt.com

219 ms

www.armstrong.bank

439 ms

analytics.js

27 ms

lri4kel.css

63 ms

Our browser made a total of 41 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 5% of them (2 requests) were addressed to the original Rbt.com, 63% (26 requests) were made to Armstrong.bank and 7% (3 requests) were made to Googletagmanager.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (929 ms) relates to the external source Armstrong.bank.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 453.9 kB (11%)

Content Size

4.2 MB

After Optimization

3.8 MB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Rbt.com main page is 4.2 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 20% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 4.1 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-83%

Potential reduce by 54.5 kB

  • Original 66.1 kB
  • After minification 63.6 kB
  • After compression 11.6 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 54.5 kB or 83% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-10%

Potential reduce by 396.0 kB

  • Original 4.1 MB
  • After minification 3.7 MB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Rbt images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-6%

Potential reduce by 3.4 kB

  • Original 59.4 kB
  • After minification 59.4 kB
  • After compression 55.9 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

CSS Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 5 B

  • Original 47.2 kB
  • After minification 47.2 kB
  • After compression 47.2 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Rbt.com has all CSS files already compressed.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 13 (35%)

Requests Now

37

After Optimization

24

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 37 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Rbt. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 11 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 4 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

rbt.com

rbt.com

32 ms

rbt.com

rbt.com

219 ms

www.armstrong.bank

www.armstrong.bank

439 ms

analytics.js

analytics.js

27 ms

lri4kel.css

lri4kel.css

63 ms

main.min.css

main.min.css

302 ms

js

js

93 ms

6a535a0f-0d73-4343-9f92-a8b8d0b7120d

6a535a0f-0d73-4343-9f92-a8b8d0b7120d

47 ms

badge.min.js

badge.min.js

129 ms

jquery.min.js

jquery.min.js

297 ms

script.min.js

script.min.js

406 ms

disclaimers.js

disclaimers.js

52 ms

collect

collect

18 ms

js

js

92 ms

p.css

p.css

31 ms

css2

css2

33 ms

gtm.js

gtm.js

101 ms

siteanalyze_6060299.js

siteanalyze_6060299.js

100 ms

logo-armstrong-bank-2021.svg

logo-armstrong-bank-2021.svg

188 ms

logo-armstrong-bank-abbrev.svg

logo-armstrong-bank-abbrev.svg

206 ms

Homepage%20Website%20Header%20(1).png

Homepage%20Website%20Header%20(1).png

483 ms

2022%20Digital%20Banking.png

2022%20Digital%20Banking.png

602 ms

icon-wallet-2x.png

icon-wallet-2x.png

296 ms

icon-trophy-2x.png

icon-trophy-2x.png

258 ms

icon-team-2x.png

icon-team-2x.png

434 ms

icon-storefront-2x.png

icon-storefront-2x.png

388 ms

icon-secureCard-2x.png

icon-secureCard-2x.png

457 ms

icon-piggyBank-2x.png

icon-piggyBank-2x.png

516 ms

icon-moneyHand-2x.png

icon-moneyHand-2x.png

568 ms

icon-mobile-2x.png

icon-mobile-2x.png

629 ms

icon-mapPin-2x.png

icon-mapPin-2x.png

660 ms

icon-checking-2x.png

icon-checking-2x.png

674 ms

icon-cards-2x.png

icon-cards-2x.png

700 ms

Mobile%20App%20Dashboard%20Screenshot-UPDATED-050520.png

Mobile%20App%20Dashboard%20Screenshot-UPDATED-050520.png

826 ms

subHead_map.jpg

subHead_map.jpg

879 ms

icon-phone.png

icon-phone.png

890 ms

icon-rocket.png

icon-rocket.png

929 ms

kernel.js

kernel.js

145 ms

Icons.woff

Icons.woff

810 ms

disclaimer

disclaimer

764 ms

image.aspx

image.aspx

17 ms

Accessibility Review

rbt.com accessibility score

97

Accessibility Issues

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Best Practices

rbt.com best practices score

83

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Missing source maps for large first-party JavaScript

SEO Factors

rbt.com SEO score

100

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Rbt.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Rbt.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

rbt.com

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Rbt. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: