Report Summary

  • 41

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    60% of other websites

  • 93

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 80% of websites

  • 75

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    35% of websites

  • 98

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    92% of websites

rejuvecosmetic.com

Rejuve Cosmetic & Wellness Center

Page Load Speed

2.7 sec in total

First Response

120 ms

Resources Loaded

2.5 sec

Page Rendered

59 ms

rejuvecosmetic.com screenshot

About Website

Click here to check amazing Rejuve Cosmetic content. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about rejuvecosmetic.com

Rejuve is a Cosmetic and Wellness Center Spa with a Medical Doctor offering a wide variety of services and products to serve our client’s needs; Cosmetic Enhancement, Botox, Dermafillers, Medical Serv...

Visit rejuvecosmetic.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Rejuvecosmetic.com page load time and found that the first response time was 120 ms and then it took 2.6 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 50% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

rejuvecosmetic.com performance score

41

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value4.2 s

20/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value7.3 s

4/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value6.5 s

39/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value430 ms

65/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.055

98/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value17.9 s

3/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

www.rejuvecosmetic.com

120 ms

minified.js

41 ms

focus-within-polyfill.js

39 ms

polyfill.min.js

37 ms

REJUVE%20Aesthetic%20Surgery%2C%20Med%20Spa%20and%20Wellness%20Center%2FREJUVE%20Aesthetic%20Surgery%2C%20Med%20Spa%20and%20Wellness%20Center%20-%20Bret%20Bruder%2Fcode.js

218 ms

Our browser made a total of 83 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 1% of them (1 request) were addressed to the original Rejuvecosmetic.com, 49% (41 requests) were made to Static.wixstatic.com and 22% (18 requests) were made to Static.parastorage.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.6 sec) relates to the external source Static.wixstatic.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 834.3 kB (56%)

Content Size

1.5 MB

After Optimization

658.7 kB

In fact, the total size of Rejuvecosmetic.com main page is 1.5 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 50% of websites need less resources to load. HTML takes 947.0 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-81%

Potential reduce by 766.2 kB

  • Original 947.0 kB
  • After minification 945.1 kB
  • After compression 180.8 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 766.2 kB or 81% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-24%

Potential reduce by 62.1 kB

  • Original 258.4 kB
  • After minification 196.3 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Rejuve Cosmetic needs image optimization as it can save up to 62.1 kB or 24% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.

JavaScript Optimization

-2%

Potential reduce by 6.1 kB

  • Original 287.7 kB
  • After minification 287.6 kB
  • After compression 281.7 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 21 (33%)

Requests Now

63

After Optimization

42

The browser has sent 63 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Rejuve Cosmetic. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 17 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.

Accessibility Review

rejuvecosmetic.com accessibility score

93

Accessibility Issues

ARIA

These are opportunities to improve the usage of ARIA in your application which may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

button, link, and menuitem elements do not have accessible names.

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Best Practices

rejuvecosmetic.com best practices score

75

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Displays images with incorrect aspect ratio

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

High

Page has valid source maps

SEO Factors

rejuvecosmetic.com SEO score

98

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Rejuvecosmetic.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Rejuvecosmetic.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Rejuve Cosmetic. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: