4.1 sec in total
555 ms
2.6 sec
924 ms
Welcome to reply.eu homepage info - get ready to check Reply best content for Italy right away, or after learning these important things about reply.eu
Reply is a company specialized in designing and implementing innovative solutions in the Digital Services, Technology and Consulting fields.
Visit reply.euWe analyzed Reply.eu page load time and found that the first response time was 555 ms and then it took 3.5 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 60% of websites can load faster.
reply.eu performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value4.8 s
11/100
10%
Value14.7 s
0/100
25%
Value15.0 s
1/100
10%
Value5,220 ms
0/100
30%
Value0.149
76/100
15%
Value34.2 s
0/100
10%
555 ms
505 ms
444 ms
194 ms
25 ms
Our browser made a total of 73 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 16% of them (12 requests) were addressed to the original Reply.eu, 49% (36 requests) were made to D11wkw82a69pyn.cloudfront.net and 11% (8 requests) were made to F.fontdeck.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (639 ms) relates to the external source Connect.facebook.net.
Page size can be reduced by 1.4 MB (41%)
3.4 MB
2.0 MB
In fact, the total size of Reply.eu main page is 3.4 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 65% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 1.9 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 155.4 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 155.4 kB or 81% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 227.7 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Reply needs image optimization as it can save up to 227.7 kB or 12% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.
Potential reduce by 472.3 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 472.3 kB or 65% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 536.4 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Reply.eu needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 536.4 kB or 86% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 30 (50%)
60
30
The browser has sent 60 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Reply. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 18 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 6 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
reply.eu
555 ms
www.reply.eu
505 ms
444 ms
iconfont.min.css
194 ms
screen.min.css
25 ms
styleadj.css
15 ms
jquery-ui.css
19 ms
reyeu.head.min.js
23 ms
cluster.head.min.js
20 ms
b64.js
16 ms
js
277 ms
conversion_async.js
238 ms
reyeu.jwplayer.js
209 ms
reyeu.footer.min.js
210 ms
investors_docs_async.min.js
207 ms
cluster.min.js
208 ms
widgets_async.min.js
205 ms
webfont.js
203 ms
WhvE1O8fd1g
360 ms
rGdtcDxm4zM
428 ms
logo-replya-2x.png
145 ms
arrow-select.png
88 ms
sep-action-bar.jpg
94 ms
event.svg
90 ms
news.svg
89 ms
financial.svg
92 ms
filler.gif
94 ms
slideshow.png
103 ms
gears_anv4.gif
104 ms
icomoon.woff
237 ms
footeropenclose.png
23 ms
45803.js
199 ms
print.min.css
159 ms
analytics.js
161 ms
userhandler.ashx
246 ms
getwidgetsasync.ashx
552 ms
userhandler.ashx
186 ms
menuhandler.ashx
233 ms
menuhandler.ashx
226 ms
userhandler.ashx
286 ms
widgets.js
228 ms
all.js
639 ms
cookiebannerhandler.ashx
419 ms
dtlab_1440x600_canvas.jpg
210 ms
logo_r20_newest.jpg
150 ms
logo_click.png
149 ms
logo_side.png
151 ms
click_1408x704_mod3.jpg
203 ms
icon_blockchain.jpg
151 ms
xchange2015_1408x704-mod1.jpg
208 ms
bnp_1408x704_mod3.jpg
203 ms
chicco_1408x704_mod3.jpg
208 ms
white_beacon_new.jpg
152 ms
puffi_grey.jpg
204 ms
breed-site_1408x704_mod3.jpg
241 ms
napapijiri-logo-1408x704-mod3.jpg
317 ms
frm.jpg
208 ms
www-embed-player-vflZsBgOl.css
241 ms
www-embed-player.js
265 ms
collect
61 ms
collect
120 ms
hfh5dOkZIbwQrQIsQAU8Uok1JWhkmc4F7cEv8Xqq9OeTlS9rY52FBz2n9bxuy84g.woff
99 ms
5kGd9pyp1MDDpS8eyyIdULQF+xiLZTLBUqOH9SxyXT5pz0DWvmhhIjG+ziMgdrAg6DyFBXsf5oQVXz2xixSUj8ROx6ubI407LTMezyMIOvF7FntQ42FHIAVLWjBsuMasbE+xLmJO2+dhsjq5A.woff
141 ms
JGg.woff
179 ms
MEIU7zqI6bbvr9sDOMowU34903oLvyHuASuFbJqrBvOixDtHL9TkFPHtSEkOpD3PoAINa0wLHxO2FrxvcREQmZOXiZsTWIHSWLDreiwQ.woff
178 ms
hyCbhKtP3XqJyAWDiRmFSdrVAXWrgO5PQXuw.woff
179 ms
FkIT5BMdbL84jCvREzAVMpOwx3dHNicNiHeMKet4emXvytUL3N76Y1YrY7WgDbyD+ZTiJLMn0xw.woff
178 ms
TBjAg2lRg.woff
238 ms
yrK4EqpSRdoujKQmsJoZ5WaLgeULvcWnibQMQSxOOnM.js
161 ms
ad_status.js
217 ms
zN7GBFwfMP4uA6AR0HCoLQ.ttf
225 ms
RxZJdnzeo3R5zSexge8UUaCWcynf_cDxXwCLxiixG1c.ttf
283 ms
collect
68 ms
reply.eu accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
<frame> or <iframe> elements do not have a title
Links do not have a discernible name
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
Best practices
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
Impact
Issue
[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.
reply.eu best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Displays images with incorrect aspect ratio
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Missing source maps for large first-party JavaScript
reply.eu SEO score
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Impact
Issue
Links are not crawlable
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Reply.eu can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Reply.eu main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
reply.eu
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Reply. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: