Report Summary

  • 26

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    45% of other websites

  • 61

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 27% of websites

  • 75

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    35% of websites

  • 85

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    55% of websites

retrip.jp

RETRIP[リトリップ] - 旅行・おでかけメディア

Page Load Speed

4.1 sec in total

First Response

14 ms

Resources Loaded

3.1 sec

Page Rendered

944 ms

retrip.jp screenshot

About Website

Visit retrip.jp now to see the best up-to-date RETRIP content for Japan and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about retrip.jp

RETRIP(リトリップ)は旅行・おでかけメディアです!インターネット上で見つけた、あらゆる旅行・おでかけ情報を自由に組み合わせ、保存、紹介することが出来ます。

Visit retrip.jp

Key Findings

We analyzed Retrip.jp page load time and found that the first response time was 14 ms and then it took 4.1 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 65% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

retrip.jp performance score

26

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value2.9 s

52/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value9.9 s

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value5.3 s

57/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value4,090 ms

1/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.094

91/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value14.2 s

9/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

retrip.jp

14 ms

retrip.jp

970 ms

js

82 ms

retrip-vendor-pc.a0f323f633ab.css

51 ms

utilities.9f2aa8663ee7.css

49 ms

Our browser made a total of 73 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 4% of them (3 requests) were addressed to the original Retrip.jp, 49% (36 requests) were made to Static.rtrp.jp and 11% (8 requests) were made to Static.retrip.jp. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.4 sec) relates to the external source Static.rtrp.jp.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 739.0 kB (20%)

Content Size

3.7 MB

After Optimization

3.0 MB

In fact, the total size of Retrip.jp main page is 3.7 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 80% of websites need less resources to load and that’s why Accessify’s recommendations for optimization and resource minification can be helpful for this project. Images take 2.0 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-82%

Potential reduce by 705.3 kB

  • Original 861.0 kB
  • After minification 856.8 kB
  • After compression 155.7 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 705.3 kB or 82% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-2%

Potential reduce by 32.8 kB

  • Original 2.0 MB
  • After minification 1.9 MB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. RETRIP images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 548 B

  • Original 843.9 kB
  • After minification 843.9 kB
  • After compression 843.3 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

CSS Optimization

-2%

Potential reduce by 395 B

  • Original 16.2 kB
  • After minification 16.2 kB
  • After compression 15.8 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Retrip.jp has all CSS files already compressed.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 25 (38%)

Requests Now

66

After Optimization

41

The browser has sent 66 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of RETRIP. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 21 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 6 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Accessibility Review

retrip.jp accessibility score

61

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Best practices

These items highlight common accessibility best practices.

Impact

Issue

High

[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.

Best Practices

retrip.jp best practices score

75

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

High

Page has valid source maps

SEO Factors

retrip.jp SEO score

85

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Links are not crawlable

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    JA

  • Language Claimed

    JA

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Retrip.jp can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that Japanese is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Retrip.jp main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of RETRIP. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: