4.1 sec in total
14 ms
3.1 sec
944 ms
Visit retrip.jp now to see the best up-to-date RETRIP content for Japan and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about retrip.jp
RETRIP(リトリップ)は旅行・おでかけメディアです!インターネット上で見つけた、あらゆる旅行・おでかけ情報を自由に組み合わせ、保存、紹介することが出来ます。
Visit retrip.jpWe analyzed Retrip.jp page load time and found that the first response time was 14 ms and then it took 4.1 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 65% of websites can load faster.
retrip.jp performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value2.9 s
52/100
10%
Value9.9 s
0/100
25%
Value5.3 s
57/100
10%
Value4,090 ms
1/100
30%
Value0.094
91/100
15%
Value14.2 s
9/100
10%
14 ms
970 ms
82 ms
51 ms
49 ms
Our browser made a total of 73 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 4% of them (3 requests) were addressed to the original Retrip.jp, 49% (36 requests) were made to Static.rtrp.jp and 11% (8 requests) were made to Static.retrip.jp. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.4 sec) relates to the external source Static.rtrp.jp.
Page size can be reduced by 739.0 kB (20%)
3.7 MB
3.0 MB
In fact, the total size of Retrip.jp main page is 3.7 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 80% of websites need less resources to load and that’s why Accessify’s recommendations for optimization and resource minification can be helpful for this project. Images take 2.0 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 705.3 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 705.3 kB or 82% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 32.8 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. RETRIP images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 548 B
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.
Potential reduce by 395 B
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Retrip.jp has all CSS files already compressed.
Number of requests can be reduced by 25 (38%)
66
41
The browser has sent 66 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of RETRIP. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 21 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 6 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
retrip.jp
14 ms
retrip.jp
970 ms
js
82 ms
retrip-vendor-pc.a0f323f633ab.css
51 ms
utilities.9f2aa8663ee7.css
49 ms
base.23d1e8a6bba8.css
52 ms
css
67 ms
home.4fc34bcda77d.css
56 ms
googletagmanager.3d592257cfba.js
50 ms
gtm.js
52 ms
logo.ee8b53951642.svg
26 ms
sprite.png
7 ms
icon_header_menu.6bb07f12da5b.svg
5 ms
icon_new.png
16 ms
131999dd533e8b-dc79-44de-af94-2d47593bc31a_thumb.jpg
115 ms
fa3863ed-94a3-4075-9d28-df5b33be7721_thumb.jpg
139 ms
retrip-adspace-pc.2398d832e4c5.js
111 ms
retrip-vendor-pc.29240288372b.js
117 ms
retrip-common-pc.1ab8d0a4674c.js
110 ms
Nonea3740d55-6ba6-48c1-9e45-0b3180c9ae61_l.jpg
132 ms
None9b3637e3-129c-4cf3-a62c-c5c0df1d25b0_l.jpg
224 ms
Nonec879c93d-6f29-4bb5-8e10-ec078c6e984d_l.jpg
134 ms
None808b3ada-4fb0-479c-bbaf-e7b2a4144eac_l.jpg
135 ms
None542ddf2d-1557-4729-bf44-d34495110e15_l.jpg
135 ms
None9f7db92d-2172-4b66-b61d-b55fd74a5dad_l.jpg
136 ms
0e632415-fbc7-46a6-ab78-6b6f10c6d4ee_thumb.jpg
112 ms
f09ec20f-2fc8-44ad-9b3d-bfc405143ca9_thumb.jpg
112 ms
1350350b202a30-0eab-4605-b446-5630c52740e9_thumb.jpg
111 ms
109520af95ee07-3d1c-4371-bf16-e3d07e9bb9fc_thumb.jpg
111 ms
3a9552b7-6f10-406e-ab46-4ba8a57855ce_thumb.jpg
116 ms
cee7b3b8-6696-430a-92b2-422d5c968bd6_thumb.jpg
131 ms
logo_instagram.548f21d3a3ce.png
127 ms
Montserrat-Regular.woff
115 ms
Montserrat-Bold.woff
114 ms
icomoon_v20.ttf
128 ms
450 ms
Yq6R-LCAWCX3-6Ky7FAFrOF6lA.woff
117 ms
flux_retrip_TM_AR.min.js
942 ms
gpt.js
458 ms
apstag.js
316 ms
1321737304f108-bc40-4da5-9f3a-b56f4cb9fb1f_m.jpg
1361 ms
side-advertisement-list.0c661076c3f2.html
38 ms
footer-induction.417a76274b8d.html
46 ms
631 ms
1319150319fb72-fd33-4d6d-9e66-664714e07648_m.jpg
32 ms
144235f7646bda-343c-41fa-8463-316c115055c7_m.jpg
775 ms
btn_appstore.png
21 ms
footer_induction_bg.jpg
18 ms
footer_induction_img.png
22 ms
pubads_impl.js
11 ms
9350216624e1f-9876-4962-b088-a5ecd660e2f0_s.jpg
796 ms
924955ea0ca2-22ff-4275-95cd-6c03368ff686_s.jpg
796 ms
87493389
71 ms
144367a037f144-9935-484d-8f1b-698bab35c749_s.jpg
4 ms
ads
427 ms
container.html
22 ms
pubads_impl_page_level_ads.js
15 ms
1416287c38f8c2-8ed9-4c30-88a3-d77670935365_thumb.jpg
7 ms
1445002ae65c28-2c1a-4303-85b1-8ee0736241ee_thumb.jpg
6 ms
143410adf8da9c-cc83-4163-b172-44519e384c24_thumb.jpg
28 ms
13016777296440780916
217 ms
load_preloaded_resource.js
49 ms
icon.png
26 ms
abg_lite.js
45 ms
window_focus.js
45 ms
qs_click_protection.js
44 ms
ufs_web_display.js
66 ms
5f7468413707c3abfd197d65a482477f.js
60 ms
fullscreen_api_adapter.js
54 ms
interstitial_ad_frame.js
173 ms
feedback_grey600_24dp.png
33 ms
settings_grey600_24dp.png
51 ms
css
34 ms
retrip.jp accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Links do not have a discernible name
Best practices
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
Impact
Issue
[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.
retrip.jp best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Browser errors were logged to the console
Page has valid source maps
retrip.jp SEO score
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Impact
Issue
Links are not crawlable
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
JA
JA
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Retrip.jp can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that Japanese is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Retrip.jp main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
retrip.jp
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of RETRIP. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: