Tools & Wizards About Us
review.li screenshot

Report Summary

  • 67

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    79% of other websites

  • 95

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 86% of websites

  • 75

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    35% of websites

  • 92

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    74% of websites

review.li

Manhattan Review GMAT GRE SAT TOEFL Test Prep in Liechtenstein

Page Load Speed

249 ms in total

First Response

38 ms

Resources Loaded

211 ms

Page Rendered

0 ms

review.li screenshot

About Website

Visit review.li now to see the best up-to-date Review content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about review.li

Manhattan Review offers GMAT, GRE, LSAT, SAT and TOEFL preparation (in-person + online) in Liechtenstein. Study with dedicated and experienced test prep tutors!

Visit review.li

Key Findings

We analyzed Review.li page load time and found that the first response time was 38 ms and then it took 211 ms to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is an excellent result, as only a small number of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

review.li performance score

67

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value2.6 s

64/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value6.1 s

12/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value3.2 s

92/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value210 ms

89/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.019

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value6.1 s

63/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

review.li

38 ms

review.li

23 ms

www.review.li

25 ms

tx_frontend.css

23 ms

layout.css

39 ms

Our browser made a total of 19 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 95% of them (18 requests) were addressed to the original Review.li, 5% (1 request) were made to Googletagmanager.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (61 ms) relates to the external source Googletagmanager.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 19.4 kB (5%)

Content Size

357.2 kB

After Optimization

337.8 kB

  • HTML
  • Images

In fact, the total size of Review.li main page is 357.2 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 30% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 335.7 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-80%

Potential reduce by 17.3 kB

  • Original 21.5 kB
  • After minification 19.4 kB
  • After compression 4.2 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 17.3 kB or 80% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-1%

Potential reduce by 2.1 kB

  • Original 335.7 kB
  • After minification 333.6 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Review images are well optimized though.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 3 (19%)

Requests Now

16

After Optimization

13

  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 16 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Review. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 4 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

review.li

review.li

38 ms

review.li

review.li

23 ms

www.review.li

www.review.li

25 ms

tx_frontend.css

tx_frontend.css

23 ms

layout.css

layout.css

39 ms

wfv12.css

wfv12.css

20 ms

default_frontend.js

default_frontend.js

49 ms

main.js

main.js

16 ms

wfv12.js

wfv12.js

14 ms

gtm.js

gtm.js

61 ms

mr-header-logo-image.svg

mr-header-logo-image.svg

17 ms

mr-grid-header-info-image-chat.svg

mr-grid-header-info-image-chat.svg

12 ms

Manhattan-Review-LI.jpg

Manhattan-Review-LI.jpg

19 ms

mr-block-text-list-ul-bullet-highlight.svg

mr-block-text-list-ul-bullet-highlight.svg

18 ms

mr-grid-footer-info-image-chat.svg

mr-grid-footer-info-image-chat.svg

15 ms

mr-footer-intro-social-icon-twitter.svg

mr-footer-intro-social-icon-twitter.svg

7 ms

mr-footer-intro-social-icon-facebook.svg

mr-footer-intro-social-icon-facebook.svg

14 ms

mr-footer-intro-social-icon-instagram.svg

mr-footer-intro-social-icon-instagram.svg

20 ms

mr-footer-intro-social-icon-youtube.svg

mr-footer-intro-social-icon-youtube.svg

19 ms

Accessibility Review

review.li accessibility score

95

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Best Practices

review.li best practices score

75

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

High

Issues were logged in the Issues panel in Chrome Devtools

SEO Factors

review.li SEO score

92

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Links are not crawlable

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Review.li can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Review.li main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

review.li

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Review. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: