2.1 sec in total
105 ms
1.6 sec
378 ms
Visit reviewinc.com now to see the best up-to-date Review Inc content for United States and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about reviewinc.com
We offer comprehensive review management solutions to help businesses gather, monitor, and leverage customer feedback to enhance their online reputation.
Visit reviewinc.comWe analyzed Reviewinc.com page load time and found that the first response time was 105 ms and then it took 2 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 40% of websites can load faster.
reviewinc.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value3.0 s
49/100
10%
Value12.7 s
0/100
25%
Value11.8 s
4/100
10%
Value2,900 ms
3/100
30%
Value0.093
91/100
15%
Value23.5 s
1/100
10%
105 ms
187 ms
105 ms
55 ms
124 ms
Our browser made a total of 75 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 17% of them (13 requests) were addressed to the original Reviewinc.com, 33% (25 requests) were made to 32a135e33d64f7686c30-b656124ffd935887cc092375604d5803.r47.cf1.rackcdn.com and 17% (13 requests) were made to 2965aabc3c848087c2a8-4a5c0bcf58232d2b50d2d7c1686f6a37.r39.cf1.rackcdn.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (536 ms) relates to the external source 2965aabc3c848087c2a8-4a5c0bcf58232d2b50d2d7c1686f6a37.r39.cf1.rackcdn.com.
Page size can be reduced by 944.5 kB (46%)
2.0 MB
1.1 MB
In fact, the total size of Reviewinc.com main page is 2.0 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 65% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 838.1 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 34.3 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 7.4 kB, which is 17% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 34.3 kB or 81% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 29.4 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Review Inc images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 277.4 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 277.4 kB or 62% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 603.4 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Reviewinc.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 603.4 kB or 85% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 40 (60%)
67
27
The browser has sent 67 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Review Inc. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 18 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 24 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
reviewinc.com
105 ms
www.reviewinc.com
187 ms
bootstrap.min.css
105 ms
style.css
55 ms
line-icons.css
124 ms
font-awesome.min.css
96 ms
flexslider.css
122 ms
layerslider.css
134 ms
custom-sky-forms.css
150 ms
page_pricing.css
253 ms
default.css
148 ms
blue.css
153 ms
conversion.js
20 ms
jquery.min.js
176 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
180 ms
bootstrap.min.js
180 ms
custom.js
417 ms
jquery.flexslider-min.js
180 ms
greensock.js
210 ms
layerslider.transitions.js
211 ms
layerslider.kreaturamedia.jquery.js
208 ms
app.js
221 ms
layer-slider.js
479 ms
app.css
61 ms
custom.css
88 ms
ie8.css
87 ms
blocks.css
89 ms
plugins.css
92 ms
animate.css
202 ms
box-shadows.css
201 ms
header-default.css
248 ms
footer-default.css
237 ms
footer-v1.css
318 ms
css
28 ms
sky-forms.css
162 ms
analytics.js
40 ms
87 ms
ReviewIncBanner227x60.png
88 ms
banner_SkyScape.jpg
416 ms
iPad_with_reviews_orange_border372.png
447 ms
iphone-RI1x152.png
352 ms
banner_go_everywhere.jpg
373 ms
ReviewSiteLogos2x400.png
428 ms
banner_business_people_blurry.jpg
333 ms
monitorwithdashboard400x355.png
536 ms
banner_chart_with_sunburst.jpg
395 ms
business_success.png
527 ms
reviewinc_smallbusiness.png
432 ms
reviewinc_enterprise.png
451 ms
reviewinc_agency.png
439 ms
fbds.js
58 ms
loader0.js
105 ms
collect
12 ms
collect
278 ms
277 ms
fontawesome-webfont.woff
321 ms
325 ms
tIAMBKijOFI
310 ms
tv2.aspx
301 ms
map-img.png
144 ms
skin.css
116 ms
6581-117-10-6030.js
56 ms
cJZKeOuBrn4kERxqtaUH3aCWcynf_cDxXwCLxiixG1c.ttf
38 ms
DXI1ORHCpsQm3Vp6mXoaTYnF5uFdDttMLvmWuJdhhgs.ttf
55 ms
c
148 ms
www-embed-player-vflfNyN_r.css
39 ms
www-embed-lightweight.js
67 ms
hqdefault.jpg
230 ms
zN7GBFwfMP4uA6AR0HCoLQ.ttf
212 ms
RxZJdnzeo3R5zSexge8UUaCWcynf_cDxXwCLxiixG1c.ttf
212 ms
blank.gif
84 ms
skin.png
50 ms
sddefault.jpg
16 ms
application2.js
104 ms
23 ms
reviewinc.com accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have a discernible name
Best practices
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
Impact
Issue
[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.
reviewinc.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Missing source maps for large first-party JavaScript
reviewinc.com SEO score
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Reviewinc.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Reviewinc.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
reviewinc.com
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Review Inc. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: