1.6 sec in total
502 ms
919 ms
138 ms
Welcome to rfq.in homepage info - get ready to check Rfq best content for India right away, or after learning these important things about rfq.in
Visit rfq.inWe analyzed Rfq.in page load time and found that the first response time was 502 ms and then it took 1.1 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 20% of websites can load faster.
rfq.in performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value2.8 s
58/100
10%
Value3.9 s
53/100
25%
Value3.5 s
89/100
10%
Value60 ms
100/100
30%
Value0
100/100
15%
Value3.7 s
90/100
10%
502 ms
74 ms
127 ms
128 ms
129 ms
Our browser made a total of 16 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 81% of them (13 requests) were addressed to the original Rfq.in, 19% (3 requests) were made to Themes.googleusercontent.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (502 ms) belongs to the original domain Rfq.in.
Page size can be reduced by 162.1 kB (72%)
224.2 kB
62.1 kB
In fact, the total size of Rfq.in main page is 224.2 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 20% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 132.5 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 6.2 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 6.2 kB or 69% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 91.1 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 91.1 kB or 69% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 64.8 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Rfq.in needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 64.8 kB or 78% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 10 (83%)
12
2
The browser has sent 12 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Rfq. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 4 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 8 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
rfq.in
502 ms
css_xE-rWrJf-fncB6ztZfd2huxqgxu4WO-qwma6Xer30m4.css
74 ms
css__VglKL3ZyT3DrRUgvNhJyCDLgRuVoc8qRRs9Er43968.css
127 ms
css_6rLrWepPN8bTYy3O-mHAacmBK1tsZx_qAmbmRisKSLc.css
128 ms
css_Wvx69yhFdFBmmlrnemSBfnf7QPBiSNR1Z8wpWOmbFpY.css
129 ms
css_OFrDobfNr05qTJ3aq4x5U3E8o1fEwbVeb8BhAG8F14c.css
130 ms
icons-config.css
137 ms
js_oCVMDTeSNt-_QxknevWyf6yO5OzmME3AhRz3ggZgNtg.js
199 ms
js_cbBUytEuFqMMxho6VtjVfV_laPP-jUy4Txj5SqhZXho.js
188 ms
js_jp3i5yEmgGzC97PmZNdjcpox2tB9HEpALcxRmL5wtVA.js
188 ms
js_woMxQ49vmqUdkiKawg0K8DZVyCEgh1Hw0bjdcOe5Qkw.js
190 ms
DXI1ORHCpsQm3Vp6mXoaTRsxEYwM7FgeyaSgU71cLG0.woff
47 ms
uYKcPVoh6c5R0NpdEY5A-Q.woff
56 ms
MTP_ySUJH_bn48VBG8sNShsxEYwM7FgeyaSgU71cLG0.woff
63 ms
css_W5MsmaOpBzQ1g4sxePLxq8B9iWthLkRY9UwmGFfdg1U.css
69 ms
css_DyvGQZL8LOKGrV-yI-0bSTVj10Sx1MiE2v8gtQS4mP8.css
66 ms
rfq.in accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Internationalization and localization
These are opportunities to improve the interpretation of your content by users in different locales.
Impact
Issue
<html> element does not have a [lang] attribute
Best practices
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
Impact
Issue
[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.
rfq.in best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
rfq.in SEO score
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Impact
Issue
Links are not crawlable
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document doesn't use legible font sizes
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Rfq.in can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Rfq.in main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
rfq.in
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Rfq. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: