Report Summary

  • 23

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    41% of other websites

  • 84

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 56% of websites

  • 83

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    55% of websites

  • 91

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    70% of websites

rfxsecure.com

Proxmark3 RFID Pentesting Shop | RfxSecure | Proxmark3 RFID/NFC Pentesting Shop

Page Load Speed

27.8 sec in total

First Response

5.9 sec

Resources Loaded

20 sec

Page Rendered

1.8 sec

rfxsecure.com screenshot

About Website

Welcome to rfxsecure.com homepage info - get ready to check Rfx Secure best content right away, or after learning these important things about rfxsecure.com

We sell mainly high-security products and sophisticated tools. CCTV, Access Control, Black Hat Tools, RFID Tools, UHF Tools, Remote/ Wholesale pricing.

Visit rfxsecure.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Rfxsecure.com page load time and found that the first response time was 5.9 sec and then it took 21.8 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 95% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

rfxsecure.com performance score

23

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value10.2 s

0/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value17.5 s

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value36.9 s

0/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value980 ms

28/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.001

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value43.4 s

0/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

www.rfxsecure.com

5943 ms

css

27 ms

gtranslate-style24.css

715 ms

style.min.css

954 ms

frontend.css

753 ms

Our browser made a total of 177 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 93% of them (164 requests) were addressed to the original Rfxsecure.com, 2% (4 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 1% (2 requests) were made to Connect.facebook.net. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (5.9 sec) belongs to the original domain Rfxsecure.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 1.4 MB (21%)

Content Size

6.6 MB

After Optimization

5.2 MB

In fact, the total size of Rfxsecure.com main page is 6.6 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 75% of websites need less resources to load and that’s why Accessify’s recommendations for optimization and resource minification can be helpful for this project. Images take 5.3 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-89%

Potential reduce by 373.3 kB

  • Original 419.9 kB
  • After minification 417.4 kB
  • After compression 46.6 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 373.3 kB or 89% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-12%

Potential reduce by 650.2 kB

  • Original 5.3 MB
  • After minification 4.6 MB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Rfx Secure needs image optimization as it can save up to 650.2 kB or 12% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.

JavaScript Optimization

-31%

Potential reduce by 184.8 kB

  • Original 593.9 kB
  • After minification 593.9 kB
  • After compression 409.2 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 184.8 kB or 31% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-53%

Potential reduce by 163.8 kB

  • Original 308.6 kB
  • After minification 307.1 kB
  • After compression 144.7 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Rfxsecure.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 163.8 kB or 53% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 75 (44%)

Requests Now

169

After Optimization

94

The browser has sent 169 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Rfx Secure. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 61 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 16 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Accessibility Review

rfxsecure.com accessibility score

84

Accessibility Issues

ARIA

These are opportunities to improve the usage of ARIA in your application which may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

[role]s are not contained by their required parent element

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Tables and lists

These are opportunities to improve the experience of reading tabular or list data using assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Lists do not contain only <li> elements and script supporting elements (<script> and <template>).

High

List items (<li>) are not contained within <ul> or <ol> parent elements.

Best Practices

rfxsecure.com best practices score

83

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

SEO Factors

rfxsecure.com SEO score

91

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Rfxsecure.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Rfxsecure.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Rfx Secure. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: