Report Summary

  • 19

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    36% of other websites

  • 65

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 30% of websites

  • 67

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    24% of websites

  • 91

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    70% of websites

rgamtransportation.com

Best Shofer/Chauffeured Transportation Services in Phoenix, Arizona- RGAM Transportation

Page Load Speed

4.6 sec in total

First Response

156 ms

Resources Loaded

3.8 sec

Page Rendered

610 ms

rgamtransportation.com screenshot

About Website

Welcome to rgamtransportation.com homepage info - get ready to check RGAM Transportation best content right away, or after learning these important things about rgamtransportation.com

Premier Transportation Services in Phoenix, Arizona. We provide Executive, Corporate, and Chauffeured Transportation Services with over twenty years of experience. Book Ride with us to enjoy executive...

Visit rgamtransportation.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Rgamtransportation.com page load time and found that the first response time was 156 ms and then it took 4.4 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 70% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

rgamtransportation.com performance score

19

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value8.0 s

0/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value16.6 s

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value18.9 s

0/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value1,520 ms

13/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.01

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value18.9 s

3/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

rgamtransportation.com

156 ms

rgamtransportation.com

377 ms

js

73 ms

utilities.css

121 ms

frontend.css

180 ms

Our browser made a total of 127 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 52% of them (66 requests) were addressed to the original Rgamtransportation.com, 15% (19 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 13% (16 requests) were made to I0.wp.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.6 sec) relates to the external source I0.wp.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 185.1 kB (15%)

Content Size

1.2 MB

After Optimization

1.0 MB

In fact, the total size of Rgamtransportation.com main page is 1.2 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 80% of websites need less resources to load and that’s why Accessify’s recommendations for optimization and resource minification can be helpful for this project. Images take 707.5 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-82%

Potential reduce by 183.1 kB

  • Original 224.6 kB
  • After minification 221.3 kB
  • After compression 41.5 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 183.1 kB or 82% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 1.3 kB

  • Original 707.5 kB
  • After minification 706.2 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. RGAM Transportation images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 439 B

  • Original 275.4 kB
  • After minification 275.4 kB
  • After compression 275.0 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

CSS Optimization

-1%

Potential reduce by 216 B

  • Original 19.7 kB
  • After minification 19.7 kB
  • After compression 19.5 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Rgamtransportation.com has all CSS files already compressed.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 76 (78%)

Requests Now

98

After Optimization

22

The browser has sent 98 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of RGAM Transportation. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 37 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 41 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Accessibility Review

rgamtransportation.com accessibility score

65

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Best practices

These items highlight common accessibility best practices.

Impact

Issue

High

[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.

Best Practices

rgamtransportation.com best practices score

67

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Serves images with low resolution

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

High

Missing source maps for large first-party JavaScript

SEO Factors

rgamtransportation.com SEO score

91

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Rgamtransportation.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Rgamtransportation.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of RGAM Transportation. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: