Tools & Wizards About Us
ricorock.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 69

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    80% of other websites

  • 83

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 54% of websites

  • 92

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    80% of websites

  • 93

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    83% of websites

ricorock.com

Swimming Pool Waterfalls by RicoRock®, Inc. - A new way to build custom swimming pool waterfalls.

Page Load Speed

2.5 sec in total

First Response

200 ms

Resources Loaded

2 sec

Page Rendered

269 ms

ricorock.com screenshot

About Website

Visit ricorock.com now to see the best up-to-date Rico Rock content for United States and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about ricorock.com

Swimming Pool Waterfalls by RicoRock, Inc., the industry leader in structural waterfalls for the pool industry.

Visit ricorock.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Ricorock.com page load time and found that the first response time was 200 ms and then it took 2.3 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 45% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

ricorock.com performance score

69

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value2.2 s

77/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value5.3 s

22/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value2.8 s

95/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value60 ms

100/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.226

55/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value4.7 s

80/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

ricorock.com

200 ms

ricorock.com

1516 ms

style.css

36 ms

lazyload-shared.css

33 ms

css

55 ms

Our browser made a total of 51 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 71% of them (36 requests) were addressed to the original Ricorock.com, 27% (14 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 2% (1 request) were made to Fonts.googleapis.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.5 sec) belongs to the original domain Ricorock.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 280.2 kB (39%)

Content Size

715.7 kB

After Optimization

435.5 kB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Ricorock.com main page is 715.7 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 75% of websites need less resources to load and that’s why Accessify’s recommendations for optimization and resource minification can be helpful for this project. HTML takes 309.5 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-85%

Potential reduce by 262.3 kB

  • Original 309.5 kB
  • After minification 309.4 kB
  • After compression 47.3 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 262.3 kB or 85% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 0 B

  • Original 209.2 kB
  • After minification 209.2 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Rico Rock images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-10%

Potential reduce by 17.5 kB

  • Original 180.6 kB
  • After minification 180.6 kB
  • After compression 163.1 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

CSS Optimization

-3%

Potential reduce by 436 B

  • Original 16.5 kB
  • After minification 16.5 kB
  • After compression 16.1 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Ricorock.com has all CSS files already compressed.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 20 (59%)

Requests Now

34

After Optimization

14

  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 34 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Rico Rock. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 16 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 6 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

ricorock.com

ricorock.com

200 ms

ricorock.com

ricorock.com

1516 ms

style.css

style.css

36 ms

lazyload-shared.css

lazyload-shared.css

33 ms

css

css

55 ms

style.min.css

style.min.css

23 ms

jquery.min.js

jquery.min.js

45 ms

Rico-Logo-White.svg

Rico-Logo-White.svg

41 ms

mediaelementplayer-legacy.min.css

mediaelementplayer-legacy.min.css

44 ms

wp-mediaelement.min.css

wp-mediaelement.min.css

46 ms

idle-timer.min.js

idle-timer.min.js

62 ms

custom.js

custom.js

62 ms

lazyload-shared.js

lazyload-shared.js

63 ms

lazyload-youtube.js

lazyload-youtube.js

64 ms

lazyload-vimeo.js

lazyload-vimeo.js

110 ms

scripts.min.js

scripts.min.js

123 ms

smoothscroll.js

smoothscroll.js

122 ms

jquery.fitvids.js

jquery.fitvids.js

146 ms

salvattore.js

salvattore.js

145 ms

frontend-bundle.min.js

frontend-bundle.min.js

156 ms

common.js

common.js

157 ms

mediaelement-and-player.min.js

mediaelement-and-player.min.js

159 ms

mediaelement-migrate.min.js

mediaelement-migrate.min.js

158 ms

wp-mediaelement.min.js

wp-mediaelement.min.js

158 ms

lazyload.min.js

lazyload.min.js

191 ms

RicoRock_Hero5-2.jpg

RicoRock_Hero5-2.jpg

132 ms

pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLCz7V1s.ttf

pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLCz7V1s.ttf

24 ms

pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLDD4V1s.ttf

pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLDD4V1s.ttf

37 ms

pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLBT5V1s.ttf

pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLBT5V1s.ttf

51 ms

pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLEj6V1s.ttf

pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLEj6V1s.ttf

56 ms

pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLGT9V1s.ttf

pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLGT9V1s.ttf

66 ms

pxiEyp8kv8JHgFVrFJA.ttf

pxiEyp8kv8JHgFVrFJA.ttf

66 ms

pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLDz8V1s.ttf

pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLDz8V1s.ttf

66 ms

pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLFj_V1s.ttf

pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLFj_V1s.ttf

66 ms

pxiGyp8kv8JHgFVrLPTedw.ttf

pxiGyp8kv8JHgFVrLPTedw.ttf

66 ms

modules.woff

modules.woff

19 ms

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsjZ0C4n.ttf

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsjZ0C4n.ttf

67 ms

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsiH0C4n.ttf

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsiH0C4n.ttf

89 ms

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsgH1y4n.ttf

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsgH1y4n.ttf

88 ms

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsg-1y4n.ttf

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsg-1y4n.ttf

88 ms

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgshZ1y4n.ttf

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgshZ1y4n.ttf

89 ms

ricorock4ftdouble.webp

ricorock4ftdouble.webp

20 ms

minicave.webp

minicave.webp

21 ms

theming.webp

theming.webp

35 ms

contemporary-waterfalls.webp

contemporary-waterfalls.webp

35 ms

IMG-20240418-WA0004-400x250.jpg

IMG-20240418-WA0004-400x250.jpg

33 ms

IMG_6933-400x250.jpg

IMG_6933-400x250.jpg

33 ms

Cannon2-4-400x250.webp

Cannon2-4-400x250.webp

52 ms

IMG-6434-400x250.webp

IMG-6434-400x250.webp

35 ms

apsp.webp

apsp.webp

77 ms

fspa.webp

fspa.webp

77 ms

Accessibility Review

ricorock.com accessibility score

83

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Best practices

These items highlight common accessibility best practices.

Impact

Issue

High

[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.

Best Practices

ricorock.com best practices score

92

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

SEO Factors

ricorock.com SEO score

93

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have descriptive text

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Ricorock.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Ricorock.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

ricorock.com

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Rico Rock. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: