Tools & Wizards About Us
ripplemind.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 29

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    49% of other websites

  • 86

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 61% of websites

  • 67

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    24% of websites

  • 99

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    93% of websites

ripplemind.com

Ripple Mind - Web Design and Development Company | Digital Marketing Company

Page Load Speed

5.6 sec in total

First Response

524 ms

Resources Loaded

4.7 sec

Page Rendered

380 ms

ripplemind.com screenshot

About Website

Visit ripplemind.com now to see the best up-to-date Ripple Mind content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about ripplemind.com

RippleMind is one of the unique digital marketing providers in Bangalore which unify creativeness with viability. We offer services like SEO, SEM, SMM, Website Design and Development, Domain Registrat...

Visit ripplemind.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Ripplemind.com page load time and found that the first response time was 524 ms and then it took 5.1 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 75% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

ripplemind.com performance score

29

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value3.6 s

33/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value11.0 s

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value15.6 s

0/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value360 ms

71/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.497

16/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value11.5 s

18/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

ripplemind.com

524 ms

font-awesome.css

238 ms

bootstrap.css

472 ms

slick.css

468 ms

jquery.fancybox.css

483 ms

Our browser made a total of 52 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 83% of them (43 requests) were addressed to the original Ripplemind.com, 4% (2 requests) were made to Fonts.googleapis.com and 4% (2 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (3.5 sec) belongs to the original domain Ripplemind.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 149.1 kB (7%)

Content Size

2.2 MB

After Optimization

2.0 MB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Ripplemind.com main page is 2.2 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 60% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 2.0 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-83%

Potential reduce by 34.6 kB

  • Original 41.6 kB
  • After minification 28.8 kB
  • After compression 6.9 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 12.8 kB, which is 31% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 34.6 kB or 83% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-5%

Potential reduce by 98.0 kB

  • Original 2.0 MB
  • After minification 1.9 MB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Ripple Mind images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-10%

Potential reduce by 11.6 kB

  • Original 112.7 kB
  • After minification 112.7 kB
  • After compression 101.1 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

CSS Optimization

-11%

Potential reduce by 4.9 kB

  • Original 44.4 kB
  • After minification 44.4 kB
  • After compression 39.5 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Ripplemind.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 4.9 kB or 11% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 21 (47%)

Requests Now

45

After Optimization

24

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 45 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Ripple Mind. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 13 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 10 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

ripplemind.com

ripplemind.com

524 ms

font-awesome.css

font-awesome.css

238 ms

bootstrap.css

bootstrap.css

472 ms

slick.css

slick.css

468 ms

jquery.fancybox.css

jquery.fancybox.css

483 ms

animate.css

animate.css

484 ms

bootstrap-progressbar-3.3.4.css

bootstrap-progressbar-3.3.4.css

488 ms

default-theme.css

default-theme.css

489 ms

style.css

style.css

701 ms

css

css

48 ms

css

css

61 ms

Logo_color.png

Logo_color.png

809 ms

2.jpg

2.jpg

938 ms

3.jpg

3.jpg

941 ms

4.jpg

4.jpg

1181 ms

banner5.jpg

banner5.jpg

953 ms

6.jpg

6.jpg

1855 ms

banner7.jpg

banner7.jpg

1857 ms

banner8.jpg

banner8.jpg

1871 ms

banner9.jpg

banner9.jpg

1881 ms

banner10.jpg

banner10.jpg

2462 ms

banner11.jpg

banner11.jpg

1889 ms

jquery.min.js

jquery.min.js

43 ms

bootstrap.min.js

bootstrap.min.js

43 ms

bootstrap.js

bootstrap.js

2088 ms

slick.js

slick.js

2092 ms

jquery.mixitup.js

jquery.mixitup.js

2105 ms

jquery.fancybox.pack.js

jquery.fancybox.pack.js

2114 ms

waypoints.js

waypoints.js

2126 ms

jquery.counterup.js

jquery.counterup.js

2320 ms

wow.js

wow.js

2323 ms

bootstrap-progressbar.js

bootstrap-progressbar.js

2340 ms

custom.js

custom.js

2350 ms

marudhararts.png

marudhararts.png

2451 ms

5.png

5.png

2552 ms

4.png

4.png

2555 ms

web.jpg

web.jpg

2807 ms

app.jpg

app.jpg

2818 ms

seo.jpg

seo.jpg

3070 ms

loader.gif

loader.gif

1977 ms

counter-bg.jpg

counter-bg.jpg

3455 ms

subscribe-bg.jpg

subscribe-bg.jpg

3227 ms

font

font

19 ms

fontawesome-webfont.woff

fontawesome-webfont.woff

2839 ms

font

font

23 ms

analytics.js

analytics.js

108 ms

ajax-loader.gif

ajax-loader.gif

593 ms

slick.woff

slick.woff

607 ms

collect

collect

13 ms

js

js

95 ms

slick.ttf

slick.ttf

236 ms

slick.svg

slick.svg

237 ms

Accessibility Review

ripplemind.com accessibility score

86

Accessibility Issues

ARIA

These are opportunities to improve the usage of ARIA in your application which may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

[aria-*] attributes do not match their roles

High

[aria-hidden="true"] elements contain focusable descendents

High

ARIA input fields do not have accessible names

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Tables and lists

These are opportunities to improve the experience of reading tabular or list data using assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Lists do not contain only <li> elements and script supporting elements (<script> and <template>).

Best Practices

ripplemind.com best practices score

67

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Displays images with incorrect aspect ratio

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

High

Page has valid source maps

SEO Factors

ripplemind.com SEO score

99

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    ISO-8859-1

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Ripplemind.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Ripplemind.com main page’s claimed encoding is iso-8859-1. Changing it to UTF-8 can be a good choice, as this format is commonly used for encoding all over the web and thus their visitors won’t have any troubles with symbol transcription or reading.

Social Sharing Optimization

ripplemind.com

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Ripple Mind. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: