Tools & Wizards About Us
rittal.es screenshot

Report Summary

  • 35

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    55% of other websites

  • 98

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 94% of websites

  • 83

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    55% of websites

  • 85

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    55% of websites

rittal.es

Rittal ES - Armarios de distribución, Distribución de corriente, Climatización, Infraestructuras TI, Automatización.

Page Load Speed

2.7 sec in total

First Response

305 ms

Resources Loaded

1.6 sec

Page Rendered

830 ms

rittal.es screenshot

About Website

Welcome to rittal.es homepage info - get ready to check Rittal best content right away, or after learning these important things about rittal.es

Cajas y armarios para la industria y las telecomunicaciones, soluciones para la distribución de corriente, componentes para la climatización de armarios eléctricos, infraestructura TI para Data Center...

Visit rittal.es

Key Findings

We analyzed Rittal.es page load time and found that the first response time was 305 ms and then it took 2.4 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 45% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

rittal.es performance score

35

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value2.4 s

71/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value8.0 s

3/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value6.8 s

34/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value1,790 ms

10/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.009

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value6.7 s

56/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

rittal.es

305 ms

669 ms

rittal~2024-05-21-11-05-52-000~cache.css

203 ms

rittal~2024-05-21-11-05-22-000~cache.js

602 ms

rics-min~2024-05-21-11-04-34-000~cache.js

330 ms

Our browser made a total of 8 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 13% of them (1 request) were addressed to the original Rittal.es, 75% (6 requests) were made to Rittal.com and 13% (1 request) were made to Browser-update.org. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (669 ms) relates to the external source Rittal.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 533.1 kB (59%)

Content Size

911.2 kB

After Optimization

378.1 kB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Rittal.es main page is 911.2 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. Only 10% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 422.3 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-82%

Potential reduce by 49.0 kB

  • Original 59.8 kB
  • After minification 59.8 kB
  • After compression 10.9 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 49.0 kB or 82% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-25%

Potential reduce by 72.7 kB

  • Original 286.9 kB
  • After minification 214.3 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Rittal needs image optimization as it can save up to 72.7 kB or 25% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.

JavaScript Optimization

-70%

Potential reduce by 293.6 kB

  • Original 422.3 kB
  • After minification 364.8 kB
  • After compression 128.8 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 293.6 kB or 70% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-83%

Potential reduce by 117.9 kB

  • Original 142.1 kB
  • After minification 114.3 kB
  • After compression 24.3 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Rittal.es needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 117.9 kB or 83% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 3 (60%)

Requests Now

5

After Optimization

2

  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 5 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Rittal. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 4 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

rittal.es

rittal.es

305 ms

669 ms

rittal~2024-05-21-11-05-52-000~cache.css

rittal~2024-05-21-11-05-52-000~cache.css

203 ms

rittal~2024-05-21-11-05-22-000~cache.js

rittal~2024-05-21-11-05-22-000~cache.js

602 ms

rics-min~2024-05-21-11-04-34-000~cache.js

rics-min~2024-05-21-11-04-34-000~cache.js

330 ms

sha1~2024-05-21-11-04-34-000~cache.js

sha1~2024-05-21-11-04-34-000~cache.js

331 ms

rittal-icons-83f2c010.ttf

rittal-icons-83f2c010.ttf

294 ms

update.min.js

update.min.js

36 ms

Accessibility Review

rittal.es accessibility score

98

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Best Practices

rittal.es best practices score

83

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Serves images with low resolution

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Missing source maps for large first-party JavaScript

SEO Factors

rittal.es SEO score

85

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have descriptive text

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Links are not crawlable

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    ES

  • Language Claimed

    ES

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Rittal.es can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that Spanish is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Rittal.es main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

rittal.es

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Rittal. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: