1.1 sec in total
139 ms
890 ms
105 ms
Welcome to rivewatch.com homepage info - get ready to check Rive Watch best content right away, or after learning these important things about rivewatch.com
Rivewatch achat / vente montre neuf et d' occasion a Paris
Visit rivewatch.comWe analyzed Rivewatch.com page load time and found that the first response time was 139 ms and then it took 995 ms to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 20% of websites can load faster.
rivewatch.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value2.6 s
65/100
10%
Value8.0 s
2/100
25%
Value11.5 s
5/100
10%
Value13,560 ms
0/100
30%
Value0
100/100
15%
Value22.0 s
1/100
10%
139 ms
66 ms
77 ms
53 ms
58 ms
Our browser made a total of 41 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 7% of them (3 requests) were addressed to the original Rivewatch.com, 73% (30 requests) were made to Static.parastorage.com and 12% (5 requests) were made to Frog.wix.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (518 ms) relates to the external source Static.wixstatic.com.
Page size can be reduced by 2.2 MB (77%)
2.8 MB
654.5 kB
In fact, the total size of Rivewatch.com main page is 2.8 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 80% of websites need less resources to load and that’s why Accessify’s recommendations for optimization and resource minification can be helpful for this project. Javascripts take 2.7 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 19.0 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 19.0 kB or 75% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 2.1 MB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 2.1 MB or 77% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 44.1 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Rivewatch.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 44.1 kB or 84% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 28 (72%)
39
11
The browser has sent 39 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Rive Watch. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 29 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.
rivewatch.com
139 ms
www.rivewatch.com
66 ms
bt
77 ms
require.min.js
53 ms
main-r.min.js
58 ms
viewer.css
56 ms
dynamicmodel
10 ms
739773_95483e69a4a93ab1fab07c46b7ba8063_466.json.z
510 ms
739773_6ad0b6bdc46ed1b7b3e73cf97867fce5_442.json.z
518 ms
ugc-viewer
39 ms
bt
143 ms
skins.min.js
157 ms
components.min.js
140 ms
utils.min.js
131 ms
core.min.js
59 ms
react-with-addons.min.js
130 ms
lodash.min.js
35 ms
TweenMax.min.js
56 ms
layout.min.js
136 ms
tpa.min.js
135 ms
fonts.min.js
135 ms
animations.min.js
134 ms
swfobject.min.js
140 ms
mousetrap.min.js
137 ms
tweenEngine.min.js
139 ms
DrawSVGPlugin.min.js
135 ms
react-dom.min.js
133 ms
ScrollToPlugin.min.js
138 ms
widgets.min.js
139 ms
experiment.js
139 ms
render.min.js
138 ms
wixappsCore.min.js
142 ms
wixappsClassics.min.js
142 ms
wixappsBuilder.min.js
140 ms
zepto.min.js
139 ms
color.min.js
137 ms
react-dom-server.min.js
215 ms
bt
204 ms
latin.css
32 ms
dc.js
79 ms
bt
67 ms
rivewatch.com accessibility score
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Buttons do not have an accessible name
Links do not have a discernible name
rivewatch.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Displays images with incorrect aspect ratio
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Page has valid source maps
rivewatch.com SEO score
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
FR
N/A
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Rivewatch.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that French is used on the page, and neither this language nor any other was claimed in <html> or <meta> tags. Our system also found out that Rivewatch.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
rivewatch.com
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of PARSED_DOMAIN, but there is no image specified in description. It would be a good idea for the website admin to select a nice image that can properly represent the website in Open Graph data, otherwise the first found image will be taken for this purpose and social media information block will look like this: