1.1 sec in total
161 ms
830 ms
73 ms
Visit xfront.com now to see the best up-to-date XFront content for India and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about xfront.com
A collection of XML and web service articles and tutorials
Visit xfront.comWe analyzed Xfront.com page load time and found that the first response time was 161 ms and then it took 903 ms to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 20% of websites can load faster.
xfront.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value1.2 s
99/100
10%
Value1.2 s
100/100
25%
Value1.3 s
100/100
10%
Value0 ms
100/100
30%
Value0
100/100
15%
Value1.2 s
100/100
10%
161 ms
261 ms
64 ms
64 ms
126 ms
Our browser made a total of 8 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that all of those requests were addressed to Xfront.com and no external sources were called. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (261 ms) belongs to the original domain Xfront.com.
Page size can be reduced by 2.6 kB (54%)
4.7 kB
2.2 kB
In fact, the total size of Xfront.com main page is 4.7 kB. This result falls within a vast category (top 1 000 000) of heavyweight, probably not optimized, and thus slow loading web pages. Only a small number of websites need less resources to load. HTML takes 3.1 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 2.3 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 1.1 kB, which is 36% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 2.3 kB or 74% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 283 B
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Xfront.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 283 B or 17% of the original size.
We found no issues to fix!
5
5
The browser has sent 5 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of XFront. According to our analytics all requests are already optimized.
xfront.com
161 ms
xfront.com
261 ms
basic.css
64 ms
navbar.css
64 ms
navlist.css
126 ms
banner_bouncing_globe.gif
77 ms
banner_text.gif
150 ms
print.css
64 ms
xfront.com accessibility score
xfront.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Browser errors were logged to the console
xfront.com SEO score
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Xfront.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Xfront.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
xfront.com
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of XFront. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: