Report Summary

  • 96

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    94% of other websites

  • 94

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 85% of websites

  • 75

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    36% of websites

  • 62

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    22% of websites

rizon.net

Rizon Chat Network

Page Load Speed

1.5 sec in total

First Response

203 ms

Resources Loaded

1.2 sec

Page Rendered

102 ms

rizon.net screenshot

About Website

Visit rizon.net now to see the best up-to-date Rizon content for Colombia and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about rizon.net

Visit rizon.net

Key Findings

We analyzed Rizon.net page load time and found that the first response time was 203 ms and then it took 1.3 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 20% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

rizon.net performance score

96

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value1.6 s

94/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value2.5 s

89/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value1.6 s

100/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value70 ms

99/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value2.5 s

98/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

rizon.net

203 ms

www.rizon.net

482 ms

screen.css

75 ms

ga.js

57 ms

website_4chan.png

100 ms

Our browser made a total of 10 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 80% of them (8 requests) were addressed to the original Rizon.net, 20% (2 requests) were made to Ssl.google-analytics.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (482 ms) belongs to the original domain Rizon.net.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 10.5 kB (30%)

Content Size

35.6 kB

After Optimization

25.1 kB

In fact, the total size of Rizon.net main page is 35.6 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. Only 10% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 17.2 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-60%

Potential reduce by 2.3 kB

  • Original 3.9 kB
  • After minification 3.4 kB
  • After compression 1.6 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 485 B, which is 12% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 2.3 kB or 60% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 16 B

  • Original 4.5 kB
  • After minification 4.4 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Rizon images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 34 B

  • Original 17.2 kB
  • After minification 17.2 kB
  • After compression 17.1 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

CSS Optimization

-81%

Potential reduce by 8.1 kB

  • Original 10.0 kB
  • After minification 7.8 kB
  • After compression 1.9 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Rizon.net needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 8.1 kB or 81% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

We found no issues to fix!

Requests Now

5

After Optimization

5

The browser has sent 5 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Rizon. According to our analytics all requests are already optimized.

Accessibility Review

rizon.net accessibility score

94

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Best Practices

rizon.net best practices score

75

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Serves images with low resolution

SEO Factors

rizon.net SEO score

62

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Rizon.net can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Rizon.net main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Rizon. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: